Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.11 for squeeze

2011-04-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:39 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:24:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Assuming that the package has been tested in a Squeeze environment, > > please go ahead; thanks. > > Yes it had been tested on squeeze, but just to make sure, I manua

Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.11 for squeeze

2011-04-26 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:24:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 07:38 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > [ Guillem Jover ] > > * Do not segfault on “dpkg -i --no-act”. > > * Add missing semicolon to the vsnprintf() compat declaration. > > Thanks to Robert Millan. Cl

Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.11 for squeeze

2011-04-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 07:38 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > [ Guillem Jover ] > * Do not segfault on “dpkg -i --no-act”. > * Add missing semicolon to the vsnprintf() compat declaration. > Thanks to Robert Millan. Closes: #612203 > * Fix typo in «dpkg-name --overwrite» argument parsin

Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.11 for squeeze

2011-04-18 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 07:38:44 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > We've fixed several regressions on the 1.15.x series, and I'd like to > upload a new 1.15.8.11 release targetting squeeze. Forgot to mention, that for these two there's functional test cases: > [ Guillem Jover ] > * Do not segf