Re: [DDEB] Status on automatic debug packages (2015-08-24)

2015-08-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > * ddebs are Debian packages with the extension .deb that > contain debugging symbols and are built implicitly. > - A package foo_1.23.deb will receive a corresponding > foo_1.23-dbgsym.ddeb package. Are they named .deb or .dd

Re: [DDEB] Status on automatic debug packages (2015-08-24)

2015-08-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 02:28:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I wonder how this list was arrived at. Offhand, I see the libc6-dbg and > python3.5-dbg packages are both in section 'debug', both of which are part > of the build-dependency closure of main; I'm pretty sure we don't want them > shu

Re: [DDEB] Status on automatic debug packages (2015-08-24)

2015-08-25 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-08-25 11:29, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08/24/2015 11:12 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> * debhelper will be including debug-ids in the control file to make it >>easier to find the necessary debug symbols for a given file. >>- Thanks to paultag for this idea. >>- This is merged int

Re: [DDEB] Status on automatic debug packages (2015-08-24)

2015-08-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08/24/2015 11:12 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > * debhelper will be including debug-ids in the control file to make it >easier to find the necessary debug symbols for a given file. >- Thanks to paultag for this idea. >- This is merged into git and will be included in the next upload. a

Re: [DDEB] Status on automatic debug packages (2015-08-24)

2015-08-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Niels, On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > * Up to 5 packages need to change section (see "Implementation- >details" below) >- See #796834, #796836, #796839, #796840, and #796842. > Implementation-details > == > > There are some deta