Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It looks great, I made a few typo fixes, added a sentence wrt > Jonathan's concern and sent it. Thanks! (Just for the record, it was not really the maintainers that are unsure that I was worried about. ;-) And such a Pre-Depends is basically always safe, as long as the

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > I reworded some things, and added the new stuff since 1.15.7 that I > mentioned on my other mail. Hope to not have missed anything else > important/user visible. Please take a look, and feel free to send. Thanks! It looks great, I made a few typo fi

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Guillem Jover wrote: > Ok! Release tagged, pushed and uploaded. > > I reworded some things, and added the new stuff since 1.15.7 that I > mentioned on my other mail. Hope to not have missed anything else > important/user visible. Please take a look, and feel free to send. Re the new triggers: |

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 15:23:10 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Given the number of disruptive changes, it's important to accompany > the upload with a d-d-a mail. I have thus prepared a draft here: > http://titanpad.com/wHeHZd9yrs Ok! Release tagged, pushed and uploaded. I reworded some things, a

Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > It's been some time now since last upload (a busy summer for me with > guests over during most of it!), and quite some changes have > accumulated, so let's set as tentative target this next sunday for > 1.16.1. Given the number of disruptive changes, it'