All Debian + -ports supported GNU triplets

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/65215384/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.gcc-4.5-armel-cross_1.46_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [3] http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-January/002022.html -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Bug#594179: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?

I am not sure how we can ensure that we've mapped to the right tuple though. Neither am I sure that the multiarch tuples are frozen already, so it might be too early for that either. Bye -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110217112730.ga19...@bee.dooz.org

Re: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?

ut, would break a current way of > cross-compiling which has been around for a long time. Should perhaps use "dpkg --print-architecture" instead? or is it for cross-compiling dpkg itself on systems without dpkg? -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@list

Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant

ev-ing the ABI too frequently (Linaro intends to work on this later this year [1]) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/binutils-linaro/+spec/stt-gnu-ifunc and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/binutils-linaro/+spec/gold-stt-gnu-ifunc -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant

here were proposals to diverge the x86 ISA. These didn't happen though, and I agree that the end result wasn't worth the pain. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l

Re: (not) simplifying dpkg-shlibdeps with readelf

and dpkg-gensymbols rely on the same underlying tool. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100426115011.ga14...@bee.dooz.org

Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance)

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Mike Bird wrote: > May I suggest then that if no dpkg maintainer objects here > within 48 hours that Ian should proceed with his update? May you stop in the next hour giving executive advice when you're not representing anybody whatsoever? -- Loïc Mini

Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??

stating the obvious, but this could be fixed at the debdiff level.) -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]