proposed text for the freeze policy can be found in
> the following merge request on salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release.debian.org/-/merge_requests/27
My favorite course of action is *not* changing anything regarding d-i
(except the fingerpointing I received afterwards,
than waiting for things to break when an implicitly
> loaded module is no longer loaded.
I'm not sure what the problem with use-ing Dpkg::Compression::Process
unconditionally would be?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Guillem Jover (2016-07-06):
> I'd like consider switching dpkg-deb --uniform-compression by default,
> so that both control.tar and data.tar members use the same
> compression, which currently would be xz (or gzip with -Zgzip).
(AFAICT 'none' is still supported, contrary to 'bzip2' and 'lzma
Ian Jackson (2016-07-13):
> Certainly it is very annoying that building src:linux takes a very
> long time even if only a small subset of its outputs are wanted. This
> is not relevant only for debugging, but can also be relevant for tasks
> like security response: if I want to locally apply an e
Jeffrey Walton (2016-06-21):
> Thanks.
>
> Changing Jessie to sid results in other problems. Something about
> sysvinit-utils:amd64. I don't know if its syscall.x32=y or the
> Cinnamon desktop, but its making my life hell because I am a Debian an
> admin.
>
> Does Debian have a first class, X32
Cyril Brulebois (2015-04-27):
> I think you may want to additional patch scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm and
> possibly scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm; you may otherwise get a sorted
> list under Files, but not under Checksums-*?
The attached patch seems to work OK with tasksel and its kinda
Guillem Jover (2015-04-27):
> Yes! Parallel builds, which I confirmed you are using from the logs,
> and I guess I assumed you where not using.
>
> In any case, given this, your initial change does make sense, but I
> think it's in the wrong place. I've instead modified Dpkg::Dist::Files
> to alw
reproducible fashion:
scripts/dpkg-distaddfile.pl has indeed:
# Obtain a lock on debian/control to avoid simultaneous updates
# of debian/files when parallel building is in use
I'd therefore suggest adding a “sort” on the above mentioned line, see
attached, untested patch.
You may wa
Hello Dominyk!
Dominyk Tiller (2014-11-11):
> Hey all,
>
> Hopefully this email reaches the group, the Debian spam filter can be a
> little overzealous at the best of times.
>
> I'm trying to compile the latest dpkg, 1.17.21 on OS X, but keep running
> into this persistent error. It could be ex
Santiago Vila (2014-11-07):
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> > To stick with Santiago's earlier wording, we are now shooting the next
> > messenger (this time dpkg, after first working hard against base-files).
>
> Indeed. I would not like to see dpkg as the next "victim" of t
Control: tag -1 -patch
Control: reassign -1 dpkg 1.17.21
Control: affects -1 debootstrap
[ Context: debootstrap/wheezy is now unable to debootstrap either jessie
or sid. ]
Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-05):
> > I'm not calling Adam's proposal insane. His proposal is just wrong
Christian Hofstaedtler (2014-10-21):
> I too see dpkg hang in the configure phase and consuming all the
> memory it can get.
>
> strace didn't yield anything useful apart from repeated brk() calls.
In these situations, something like gdb would probably more helpful than
strace. (At least to lear
Hi,
Agustin Henze (2014-07-28):
> Hi all,
>In my work we are using debian obviously... But the most
> important part is that is an embedded system very particular. We are
> using ARM architecture and the constraint harder that we have is the
> bandwidth. It's really important to us reduce
Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49)
> > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols
> > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols 2013-0
I personally don't think it's a good idea to get such patches into
stable. Anyway if someone wants to proceed anyway, here are a few
things I spotted:
Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28):
> apt (0.9.7.9+deb7u2) wheezy-security; urgency=high
>
>* SECURITY UPDATE: apt-get source validation (closes
Raphaël Hertzog (12/07/2012):
> Additionnaly it also solves a problem that we have with multi-arch
> same packages and bin-nmu. Such a bin-nmu means that the changelog
> on the bin-nmued architecture will be different from the other
> arches and the package is thus no longer co-installable.
When
Philipp Kern (03/11/2012):
> are there plans on the dpkg side to support other compression
> methods for the control.tar in .deb files? Some of the d-i udebs
> have large debconf templates which are only compressed with gzip,
> while xz would yield smaller udebs.
That would be lovely to have, at
Hello,
directing this mail to -dpkg@, which hopefully makes sense.
Steve McIntyre (21/07/2012):
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:01:21PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:19:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> CD sizing problems
> >> ==
> >
> >> Ther
Martin-Éric Racine (13/07/2012):
> This seems to be caused by either 'tar' or 'gzip' using /tmp to build
> the package. Since recent Debian systems default to using tmpfs for
> /tmp, systems with insufficient memory or with another process using
> all available memory resources will make the build
Hello,
Michael Gissing (13/07/2012):
> I'm not sure whether that's the suitable mailing list, so if theres
> a better one I would really appreciate a hint.
I think you want debian-user@ or debian-mentors@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell (10/04/2012):
> dpkg auto-rebuild ??
Read. That's “dpkg auto-build”.
> I don't see dpkg(1) documenting that. apt(1) maybe ?
If you would have read the first mail, you would know it's related to
dpkg auto-building within jenkins, as set up by mika.
> [ rand
-By: Cyril Brulebois
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules
Closes: 192619 367608 427945
-By: Cyril Brulebois
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect- Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules
Closes: 192619 367608 427945
Cyril Brulebois (30/01/2012):
> I can make that NMU, point taken.
I've updated the changelog accordingly.
> Guillem Jover (30/01/2012):
> > Thanks, I had pushed your build patch to hadrons' master branch. I
> > see Raphaël has queued it too, although the changelog
Guillem Jover (30/01/2012):
> That it seems to work does not mean it's fine, I just fixed some days
> ago bogus arguments passed to maintainer scripts, for example.
Possible bugs can easily be found, and then fixed, by exposing packages to…
users. Experimental also means only people pulling it wi
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog (23/01/2012):
> just to let you know that I have updated my "test-build" branch (and
> hence the "dpkg-test" APT repository[1]). Guillem has merged all the
> remaining fixes I had in pu/multiarch/full so his pu/multiarch/master
> is currently passing the multi-arch test-suite
Russ Allbery (13/01/2012):
> Yes, but there was some discussion in the Policy bug asking why shlibs
> files were required when they're not used if a symbols file is present,
> and while I originally argued that keeping them both made sense, I came
> around to that position after reviewing the bug
Hi Guillem,
Raphael Hertzog (06/11/2011):
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > > I will also ensure that this second upload happens.
> > >
> > > so are we on track for the upload of dpkg to sid by the end of the week?
> >
> > Ping?
>
> Guillem, can you please share some tentative s
Cyril Brulebois (06/09/2011):
> Can we give dpkg more exposure than “build from git”? It's been 2+
> months already since that announcement and one cannot really test
> “Multiarch in Debian unstable” as written in the subject.
It's been even more time now, can we please ge
Steve Langasek (27/06/2011):
> But when can I use it?
> ==
>
> As noted above, support for the multiarch filesystem layout solves only one
> of the two problems preventing side-by-side installation of packages from
> multiple architectures. The other problem, package manager
Empty lines are quite useful as (visual) delimiters between sections in
symbols files, for example when libfoo0 contains libfoo-bar.so.0 and
libfoo-baz.so.0. Consider them like comments: ignore them. This gets us
rid of such warnings (which by the way are missing line numbers):
| dpkg-gensymbols: w
gt; While at it, catch unexpanded DPKG_ macros in the same way.
Checked with DPKG_FOO_DOES_NOT_EXIST, looks also right:
| configure.ac:47: error: possibly undefined macro: DPKG_FOO_DOES_NOT_EXIST
| If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
| See the Autoconf d
Hi,
and without gettext, building breaks in dselect/po (which I could have
skipped…) and in scripts/po:
,
| $ make -C scripts/po/
| make: Entering directory `/home/kibi/dpkg.git/scripts/po'
| test ! -f ./dpkg-dev.pot || \
| test -z "ca.gmo de.gmo es.gmo fr.gmo pl.gmo ru.gmo sv.gmo" ||
Hi,
again with a minimal chroot, configure bails out on missing curses,
which is fine, but finally returns successfully; however, building
fails, quite badly since the ylwrap wrapper doesn't say anything about
what goes wrong:
| $ make
| …
| LEXtrigdeferred.c
| make[4]: *** [trigdeferred.c]
Hi,
not sure how you want to solve it, but autoreconf'ing without
pkg-config installed leads to a bad configure-time error.
autoreconf:
,
| …
| autoreconf: running: aclocal --force -I m4
| configure.ac:50: warning: PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG is m4_require'd but not
m4_defun'd
| m4/dpkg-libs.m4:55:
Dmitry Katsubo (31/03/2011):
> So, how is it possible to preserve a variable and/or to (re-)define
> it? Looks to be a trivial problem, but I am completely stuck.
From the debuild manpage:
| debuild [debuild options] [dpkg-buildpackage options]
Watch the order.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descriptio
Phillip Susi (29/10/2010):
> Is this a known bug or misconfiguration in apt?
AFAICT, package managers do indeed call dpkg several times, meaning
the triggers effect isn't as much a big win as it could be. :(
You could check that by calling your package manager with:
strace -f -e execve $your_s
Cyril Brulebois (23/10/2010):
> I'll try and see whether I can come up with a fix.
I think the attached patch does what we want: make having ncurses
mandatory except if one passes --without-dselect.
Mraw,
KiBi.
From 36a6506836e11604d723f47518e8a68dcc8e12fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
Michael Schmidt (22/10/2010):
> Is the configure script provided by the package supposed to check if
> libncursesw is installed?? Because I tried to compile the deselect
> part, and in the configure fase it didn't complain. Then when I
> wnated to make (compile) it stoped with an error, I later f
Helge Kreutzmann (17/08/2010):
> Hello,
Hi,
> is there an ETA for string freeze for Squeeze? Some recent
> developments (including their strings) where only briefly visible in
> master before beeing uploaded to sid, leaving translators without
> much time to update their po files.
last times, f
Raphael Hertzog (22/07/2010):
> > Unless I'm missing something, the “increment” part is processed
> > before the condition is checked, meaning one can happily
> > dereference sl without checking for its being non-0.
>
> Except that if "sl" is NULL from the start, the loop is not executed.
(There
Cyril Brulebois (22/07/2010):
> | 1217for (sl = a->slaves; sl; sl_prev = sl, sl = sl->next) {
Unless I'm missing something, the “increment” part is processed before
the condition is checked, meaning one can happily dereference sl
without checking for its being n
Jonathan Nieder (21/07/2010):
> Trying to remove iceweasel causes update-alternatives to segfault
> for me. iceweasel prerm does
>
> update-alternatives --remove x-www-browser /usr/bin/iceweasel
> update-alternatives --remove gnome-www-browser /usr/bin/iceweasel
Reproduced with dpkg -P icew
Hi,
you want debian-user for such questions.
tangke (17/05/2010):
> How to avoid stoping/starting a service while installing a service
> package? How does debian installer take care of it?
You probably want to read /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz
(specifically the bits about policy
Xuan Ngo (12/04/2010):
> Where can I find the definitions of all sections in the Control file?
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections
(Keeping you in Cc, not sure you're subscribed since you didn't know
about that info's being documented in Policy.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
Gunnar Wolf (04/01/2010):
> It seems the problem is reproducible on all Lenny hosts - And it is
> quite likely to be a proper bug, as the file is for some reason
> recognized as a v2.0 source package.
>
> My previous (accepted) upload was done on 2009-11-25, and dpkg-dev
> dies the same way when
Patrick Schoenfeld (10/12/2009):
> I currently have some spare time and want to improve my C knowledge,
> therefore I wonder if anybody is already working on the roadmap
> point "Rewrite dpkg-divert in C". Otherwise I would like to work on
> it.
Read the archives. Many mails about that recently.
Yuri Vasilevski (17/11/2009):
> Hello,
Hi,
> For some more details please see:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293516
indeed, nothing to do with off_t…
From my reading the perlsub manpage, the underscore in prototypes
wasn't supported in perl 5.8, while it is in perl 5.10. Its
purpose
David Benjamin (29/08/2009):
> The current list-files are good for the query "given a package, what
> did it install". They also have fairly fast updates. However, they
> are extremely poorly suited for the query "given a file, what
> package(s) installed it" or if you need to read it all in at
>
Shomari Sharpe (24/06/2009):
> I've been having problems with dpkg for sometime now. These problems
> fall under "dependencies", where applications cannot be installed or
> configured due to this fact.
If you'd be using Debian that'd be a question for debian-u...@.
> My distribution is Ubuntu Ja
mirak mirak (14/05/2009):
> Hi,
o<,
> So if the source package is application-x.y.z.0.dsc , the binary
> package could just have an increment version, like is
> application-x.y.z.0^1.deb, or an ordered hash code, or the build date.
that's what happens in the archive already, using binNMUs. An e
Daniel Burrows (03/05/2009):
> I was wondering, is there a specific security reason that this
> information is hidden from non-root users? If there is, I should
> probably consider doing the same thing in aptitude. But it would
> really suck if users couldn't pull up this very useful informati
wojtekb82_23 (10/04/2009):
> I would like the presented below command to be extended in such way so
> that the package will be installed in $HOME/opt
>
> dpkg -i package.deb
dpkg -x might be a start. And better use debian-user@ for support.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Jaroslaw Tabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (23/11/2008):
> Hello!
Hi,
> Is there any way to obtain information when some package was
> installed/deinstalled ?
you want dpkg's log, /var/log/dpkg.log*
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/07/2008):
> I'll push there some "private" branches:
> - personal work in progress
> - patches from the BTS that I updated/rebased
>
> Beware, those branches can be rebased and as such you shouldn't use
> those for long-lived work. But feel free to fetch the
On 19/05/2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > By the way, do you have any idea what that error code 11 from
> > dpkg-shlibdeps really means (in the log I linked in the previous
> > mail)?
>
> No, sorry. All "normal" errors end up printing something on std
ncy-based initscripts?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpDhxO08zvRF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 25/02/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> What you want him to do is using:
>
> git rebase -i
Probably with -p.
--
Cyril Brulebois, who tried, w/o prior knowledge of the code.
pgpoAOtx3byAG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
58 matches
Mail list logo
