On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Luke,
allo steve.
> I think you are working from a buggy assumption here.
i'm pleased - and relieved - to see the word "think".
> The problem is not
> that infrastructure is lacking to let Konstantinos et al. get on with making
>
Hi Luke,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:06:27AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> sorry, markos - and again, apologies to all, but i am actually now
> getting deeply concerned.
> allow me to ask you this, markos. why, if someone says, "i have an
> idea that could help you, and could help
sorry, markos - and again, apologies to all, but i am actually now
getting deeply concerned.
allow me to ask you this, markos. why, if someone says, "i have an
idea that could help you, and could help the debian project in
general, it's complex, it's been misunderstood frequently in the past
(not
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> Luke,
>
> 1. My name is Konstantinos, or Kostas, or if you prefer, just call me
> markos. It's not konstantinos, and it's not konstantinous.
sorry! :) i have always spotted such auto-finger-typing errors in
the past: i apologise
+++ Steve Langasek [2011-02-17 12:03 -0800]:
> Loïc's latest post drew my attention back to this thread, where I see I had
> this message flagged for follow-up:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:35:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > > I realize this is ideal, but:
>
> > > - there's been
Luke,
1. My name is Konstantinos, or Kostas, or if you prefer, just call me
markos. It's not konstantinos, and it's not konstantinous.
2. My workload is big even without considering "crazy" solutions of
distro-wide bitbake-integrations. If you so strongly believe that this
method works so great, f
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I really would like to know the stance of the dpkg maintainers regarding the
> armhf dpkg patch. I have a ton of armhf patches that I'm waiting to file as
> bug reports, but without the dpkg patch, those patches would b
Loïc's latest post drew my attention back to this thread, where I see I had
this message flagged for follow-up:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:35:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > I realize this is ideal, but:
> > - there's been very strong upstream pushback on this, asserting that this
>
Vecmilgravja veikalinjaa sodien var iegadaties shaujamo Kahr Arms MK9
Nav vajadziga ne atlauju, ne atlauju no policista!
Neparproti, un mekle realaja rajonaa: http://www.bezatlaujas.info !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hey
Trying to kick the dust a bit as having the triplet "in the air" is
kind of an unhappy situation for armhf :-)
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> We currently need something like this in dpkg-dev because the mappings
> need to be bidirectional, as dpkg-dev needs to be ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
