Bug#1074346: Trixie and later on i386 will no longer support UEFI Secure Boot

2024-06-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Steve McIntyre dixit: >we no longer have a signed >shim. Signed GRUB and fwupd-efi packages will also be removed soon. Might want to note this on amd64 as well, for those 64-bit systems with 32-bit EFI. bye, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)

Re: looking for an upgrade path

2010-12-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Jonathan Nieder dixit: >What does > > dpkg-divert --listpackage /usr/share/man/man1/sh.1.gz Ah, it’s mksh (of course)… bye, //mirabilos -- you introduced a merge commit│ % g rebase -i HEAD^^ sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │ Segmentation should have cloned into a clean

Re: looking for an upgrade path

2010-12-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Jonathan Nieder dixit: >In this case you can probably remove the diversions with >"dpkg-reconfigure mksh" before installing dash again. Yeah. Afterwards I just changed the symlink manually… >Yes, this is a regression. If you have time to test or review, I'd be >glad to put up a rough dash .dsc

Re: Bug#540512: Bug#538822: dash and local diversions

2010-12-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: >I put together a proposed patch (attached) for the Release Notes, Looks good to me, thanks. (Indeed, I should have known the issue, but forgot that these were its symptoms.) bye, //mirabilos -- Support mksh as /bin/sh and RoQA dash NOW! ‣ src:bash (241 (259) bugs: 0 RC,

Bug#683838: release-notes: transition: pdksh → mksh

2012-08-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: release-notes Severity: normal Hi, Robert asked me to replace pdksh with its successor mksh in time for the wheezy release, and we’d like it to be gone in jessie. Right now, pdksh is a transitional package, and the upgrade might need some sysadmin and/or user effort: ① The sysadmin need

Bug#683838: ping mksh-related release items

2012-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, I’d like to do a ping for mksh unblocking and the release notes entry, just so they don’t accidentally forgotten. In case someone already has these on their radar, please sorry for the noise. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much*

Bug#683838: release-notes: transition: pdksh → mksh

2013-04-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Julien Cristau dixit: >That sounds appropriate for a pdksh NEWS.Debian file, not the release >notes? I don’t think so – the change should really be done before the new pdksh package is installed, since it’ll immediately begin affecting users. >We can add pdksh to the list of packages that are go

Bug#683838: release-notes: transition: pdksh → mksh

2013-04-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Julien Cristau dixit: >If mksh is not a drop-in replacement then I'm not sure it's a good idea >to have it provide a transitional package. Might as well leave the old >pdksh alone so there's no functionality loss... mksh contains an lksh binary which is a drop-in for scripts. The only thing it’s

Bug#683838: release-notes: transition: pdksh → mksh

2013-04-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Joost van Baal-Ilić dixit: >I propose this text instead: > >--- > > > Pdksh to mksh transition ^ I’d not capitalise here, as it’s a name/“trade”mark. If you really must, I guess PDksh would make more sense. > >The Public Domain Korn Shell ( role="package">pdksh) >pac

Bug#683838: release-notes: transition: pdksh → mksh

2013-04-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Vincent McIntyre dixit: >- pdksh is no longer maintained (it has last seen active >- development in 1999). >+ pdksh is no longer maintained (it has not been >+ actively developed since 1999). sure >- symlink. This compatibility binary behaves a bit more like the >traditiona

typo fix

2014-11-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
also don't like enabling JavaScript in > Because I use lynx as browser. +1 -- Octavio Alvarez, me and ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ (Mario Lang) on debian-develFix typo. Signed-off-by: Thorsten Glaser Index: manuals/trunk/release-

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I was surprised to know that gnu java which at one point was a > > high-priority project was deprecated within gcc > > When Sun released Java under the GPL and started the OpenJDK project it > lost its raison d'être. One of them. GCJ is more portabl

Bug#1074346: Trixie and later on i386 will no longer support UEFI Secure Boot

2025-06-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:16:06 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Might want to note this on amd64 as well, for those >> 64-bit systems with 32-bit EFI. > > I think this is the only thing that might possibly benefit from >

Bug#1107573: release-notes: Document dropped cronjobs for trixie

2025-06-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: release-notes Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-init-divers...@chiark.greenend.org.uk Several packages have dropped cronjobs in favour of systemd timers or somesuch, despite these not being covered by the GR about init scripts. The release notes should contain a complete list of a