release-notes, issues - using without role=...

2021-08-13 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
While translating the issues file I noticed that three occurences of fail2ban uses as tag instead of the more common role="package">. Looks like only these three lines in the entire repo does it like this. Might be an oversight. > Users of fail2ban in combination with > bsd-mailx who wish >

Release Notes: Unknown reference "newreleasename"

2023-06-07 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
Hi Noticed that &newreleasename; was added in the upgrading section of the release notes (looks to be introduced via #1035089) and I can parse that (or can I?) but make validate does not pass clean with it. brother@janmayen:~/git/other/debian/release-notes (master *)$ LC_ALL=C make validate

Bug#608945: release-notes: installing.po - platforms misspelled

2011-01-04 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
package: release-notes severity: wishlist when translating the release notes I found the following string: "The installation system now supports the following plataforms:" where the last word should be "platforms" -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu "Värt att notera här är att när Svartholm Warg

question regarding release-notes:old-stuff.po

2011-01-04 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
I found this message when doing translation updates for Swedish and need a hand in deciphering it. "To configure your system's locale you can run dpkg-reconfigure locales. Ensure you select an UTF-8 locale when you are presented with the question asking which locale to use as a default in the

release-notes: whats-new.po, dependency booting -> same information twice

2011-01-06 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
in the paragraphs about dependency based boot the fact that the feature is on by default is specified twice. "An important improvement in the &debian; boot system is the introduction of dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot. This feature is enabled by default in new installs and i

Re: Release Notes ready to *start* updating translations?

2011-01-08 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: Also it would be good to know if the .po files are being kept up to date automatically or we have to run some script/make invocation first. They are not up to date. So every session you have to do the following. 1. go to the subversion check out. 2.

Re: How do convert release notes sources from .dbk to .po format?

2011-01-31 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Marcelo Santana wrote: Please, does anyone can say me what is the correct way to convert release notes sources from .dbk to .po format? I'm trying to update Brazilian Portuguese translation of Squeeze release notes and I'm using po4a 0.34-2 (as recommended on Makefile) as

\n or not to \n in Release Notes

2011-02-01 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
Hi Have you decided on using \n in upgrading or not? We had to remove them some days ago but they popped up again now. Just checking. 37 fuzzy lines for almost just adding a leading \n. (I had some spelling errors to take care of too =)) -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Bruce Schneier once

Re: \n or not to \n in Release Notes

2011-02-01 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: On 1 February 2011 22:07, Julien Cristau wrote: 37 fuzzy lines for almost just adding a leading \n. (I had some spelling errors to take care of too =)) Care to explain what you're talking about?  upgrading.dbk has not changed recently. M

Release notes: upgrading.po misspelled

2011-03-15 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
Doing the Swedish update of the release notes and just found the following error in upgrading.po. "...to log the result of the actiosn described..." quick fix. -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Bruce Schneier's tears can burn holes through an OpenBSD firewall. Lucky for us, Bruce Schneier

Re:

2011-03-31 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-31 15:10, Kirubel Dereje wrote: > i am a computer science student in Mekelle university , Ethiopia now i > have a project on os so could you help me by sending me about debian > short history,vertions and ther feutures, and also general in

Things to check in release notes

2013-04-29 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
in upgrading.po I found "All OpenERP 5 packages have been removed and are obsolete. This includes openerp-client, role=\"package\">openerp-server, role=\"package\">openerp-web." Add a "and" instead of the last comma as this is a list? Would reach some consistency at least. Or maybe change othe

Release notes comments: whats-new.po

2013-04-29 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
in whats-new.po I saw that LXDE is noted as having a version number (0.5.0). This seems odd when LXDE is made out of individual components with different version numbers. I should know this as I am the upstream release manager =) My proposal would be to remove the version number from the sente

Proof reading and related updates to Release notes?

2017-05-30 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Did the Swedish translation of the Release notes over the last few days. One of the great things with this is that I also read most of the English strings during this process and I found a bunch of oddities that I think need to be adjusted. I am not