While translating the issues file I noticed that three occurences of
fail2ban uses as tag instead of the more common role="package">. Looks like only these three lines in the entire repo
does it like this. Might be an oversight.
> Users of fail2ban in combination with
> bsd-mailx who wish
>
Hi
Noticed that &newreleasename; was added in the upgrading section of the
release notes (looks to be introduced via #1035089) and I can parse that
(or can I?) but make validate does not pass clean with it.
brother@janmayen:~/git/other/debian/release-notes (master *)$ LC_ALL=C
make validate
package: release-notes
severity: wishlist
when translating the release notes I found the following string:
"The installation system now supports the following plataforms:"
where the last word should be "platforms"
--
/brother
http://martin.bagge.nu
"Värt att notera här är att när Svartholm Warg
I found this message when doing translation updates for Swedish and need a
hand in deciphering it.
"To configure your system's locale you can run dpkg-reconfigure
locales. Ensure you select an UTF-8 locale when you are
presented with the question asking which locale to use as a default in the
in the paragraphs about dependency based boot the fact that the feature is
on by default is specified twice.
"An important improvement in the &debian; boot system is the introduction
of dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot. This feature is
enabled by default in new installs and i
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Also it would be good to know if the .po files are being kept up to date
automatically or we have to run some script/make invocation first.
They are not up to date.
So every session you have to do the following.
1. go to the subversion check out.
2.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Marcelo Santana wrote:
Please, does anyone can say me what is the correct way to convert release notes
sources from .dbk to .po format?
I'm trying to update Brazilian Portuguese translation of Squeeze release notes
and I'm using po4a 0.34-2 (as recommended on Makefile) as
Hi
Have you decided on using \n in upgrading or not? We had to remove them
some days ago but they popped up again now.
Just checking.
37 fuzzy lines for almost just adding a leading \n. (I had some spelling
errors to take care of too =))
--
/brother
http://martin.bagge.nu
Bruce Schneier once
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
On 1 February 2011 22:07, Julien Cristau wrote:
37 fuzzy lines for almost just adding a leading \n. (I had some
spelling errors to take care of too =))
Care to explain what you're talking about? upgrading.dbk has not
changed recently.
M
Doing the Swedish update of the release notes and just found the following
error in upgrading.po.
"...to log the result of the actiosn described..."
quick fix.
--
/brother
http://martin.bagge.nu
Bruce Schneier's tears can burn holes through an OpenBSD firewall. Lucky for
us, Bruce Schneier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-31 15:10, Kirubel Dereje wrote:
> i am a computer science student in Mekelle university , Ethiopia now i
> have a project on os so could you help me by sending me about debian
> short history,vertions and ther feutures, and also general in
in upgrading.po I found
"All OpenERP 5 packages have been removed and are obsolete. This includes
openerp-client, role=\"package\">openerp-server, role=\"package\">openerp-web."
Add a "and" instead of the last comma as this is a list? Would reach some
consistency at least. Or maybe change othe
in whats-new.po I saw that LXDE is noted as having a version number
(0.5.0). This seems odd when LXDE is made out of individual components
with different version numbers. I should know this as I am the upstream
release manager =)
My proposal would be to remove the version number from the sente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Did the Swedish translation of the Release notes over the last few
days. One of the great things with this is that I also read most of
the English strings during this process and I found a bunch of
oddities that I think need to be adjusted. I am not
14 matches
Mail list logo