Bug#545420: release-notes: Please document Shorewall transition

On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:05:44AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > shorewall (4.4.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > Users upgrading from Shorewall 4.0 to 4.4 (i.e., Lenny to Squeeze) > > should refer to this article for details on the upgrade process: > > http://www.shorewall.net/LennyTo

Re: Patch to remove securing-howto section about creating security updates

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hi, > > As mentioned in earlier mails and also noted in the manual itself, the > devref is the place where instructions for DD's on providing updates for a > DSA are located. The current instructions in the securing-howto are > out

Re: (forw) svn write access for release-notes

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:03:21PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Forwarding this to -doc I'm seeing updates in the Romain side of the Release Notes so I guess that this issue is fixed. Right? Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please update the translations of the Release Notes for Squeeze (Debian 6.0)

Hi everyone, [BCC'ing the translation coordinator's for this document, sorry if you get duplicates ] As you might have already read [1] the current target date for the release of Debian 6.0 - "Squeeze" is the next weekend (5th and 6th Februrary). This means that translators should be workin

Status of Release Notes before the release (was Re: Please update ....)

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:44:53PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > As you might have already read [1] the current target date for the release of > Debian 6.0 - "Squeeze" is the next weekend (5th and 6th Februrary). > > This means that translators should be w

Build logs for Squeeze Release Notes?

Hi there, I'm trying to debug why some sections of the Release Notes' translation to Spanish are untranslated (even though the PO files are 100%). I wonder: where are the logs for the release notes for Squeeze? The following log files: http://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/webwml/release-notes

Re: Build logs for Squeeze Release Notes?

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:25:27PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Anyone can point me or, better yet, look into the build logs to see why the > Spanish translation is not getting updated at the website? I'm not sure what's going on but I get a lot of errors w

Re: Build issues on DDP, system reconfiguration/migration?

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:56:50AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:25:27PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > > wrote: > > > Anyone can point

Bug#612011: release-notes: please replace catalan translator

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:26:17PM +, Hector Oron wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > Current catalan translator is retired, so, please consider the following > patch with adds myself to be new translator for catalan. I've updated README.translators as you s

Bug#612011: release-notes: please replace catalan translator

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:45:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > The top of this file states that this is a list of all previous translators > for the language. Please don't remove past translators from the list, and > please add yourself only once you have contributed translations. I'm adding h

Error in publication of Release Notes at the website - fixed (was Re: Build logs for Squeeze Release Notes?)

(cc'ing debian-i18n as this affects translators of the Release Notes too) On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:25:27PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > Anyone can point me or, better y

Bug#611521: [INTL:da] Danish translation of release-notes

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 12:29:48AM +0100, Torben Grøn Helligsø wrote: > Package: release-notes > > On 05-02-2011 22:48, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:48:17PM +0100, Torben Grøn Helligsø wrote: > >> I attach a Danish translation

Bug#611521: [INTL:da] Danish translation of release-notes

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:52:45PM +0100, Torben Grøn Helligsø wrote: > On 06-02-2011 11:34, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > In addition, could you please review the build of the 'da' Release Notes? > > Based on the build logs [1] the Danish Release Notes do no

Re: Error in publication of Release Notes at the website - fixed (was Re: Build logs for Squeeze Release Notes?)

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:19:23AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > To prevent this issue I'm temporarily moving the 'da' language to the end of > the LANGUAGES list. I have been unable to make the Makefile more resilient to failure in incomplete languages. Thus, since I've seen bre

Re: wrte access to debian documentation project (ddp) etc. (Bug#612011)

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:05:36AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Partial write access is not supported. Whoever get write access as a > member of "ddp" on alioth shall have full write acess to all DDP pages. I know that partial acess is not supported (but we might want to do this in the future, some

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design. > > It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be reorganized to > make more important things to be more accessible. I would like to > update thei

Tweak required for release notes 'publishing' at www-master

Hi there, The Release Notes build logs [1] show that the cron task building the notes is dumping the results in /srv/www.debian.org/release-notes/testing at www-master. As a consequence, the Release Notes content which is pointed from http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/releasenotes does not g

Re: Squeeze released: old version of release-notes on the website

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 08:36:25AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > congratulations to all for releaseing for 6.0. > > Did you know, that there are old versions (dated on 2010-11-12) > online on the new designed debian website? Well, it's not actually an old version, it just has an old dat

Re: Status of Release Notes before the release (was Re: Please update ....)

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:51:05AM +0100, Miroslav Kure wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:12:03AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > > > [ ... 6 days after ... ] > > > > I'm happy to see that the Release Notes are currently in very good s

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that? Most of the documentation nowadays is built using Docbook although some documents are still based on debiandoc-SGML. In any case, how can we help you? Regards

Re: Tweak required for release notes 'publishing' at www-master

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:25:43PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > I cannot access www-master, could someone please take a look at this? If I'm > pointed to where the cron tasks reside and given access to www-master I could > probably take care of this myself I

Re: Debian FAQ (was: update of DDP related web pages)

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:46:56PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting "Osamu Aoki" : > >"Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml. > > Between 2008-05-19 and 2008-10-03, I created a docbookified, > po4aified, and utf8ifed branch of the FAQ: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddp/manual

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:49:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > In future, it would be nice to maybe re-think what we put on which > CDs. Some people have suggested having a separate CD for docs, which > I'll admit I'm not such a fan of for a variety of reasons. I'm tempted > to suggest that we m

Re: FAQ Reference to Obsolete Documentation (APT-HOWTO)

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:59:00PM -0500, James Montgomery wrote: > Hello, > > I was reading the Debian FAQ, Chapter 8 when I came across a > reference/hyperlink [1] to the ?APT HOWTO?. Upon visiting the > apt-howto I noticed the entire document was labeled ?Obsolete?. Thanks for the report, I'v

Bug#612349: [PATCH] upgrading: warn about missing firmware

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:29:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > When upgrading the kernel it may be necessary to install some firmware. > Warn about this in the kernel upgrade section. Looks good. I would change however: "means that it may be necessary to install additional firmware packages af

Bug#617466: marked as done (release-notes: Instructions do not restart script after reboot.)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:42:55AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > May I suggest the attached small patch to your footnote? Sure, commited to SVN (revision 8568). Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#612349: [PATCH] upgrading: warn about missing firmware

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:02:39PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I think it's too late to change before 6.0.1. Can you remind me again > next week? Added now (revision 8585). I've also a pointer (in a comment) to Raphael's blog about non-free firwmare at http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/03/14/miss

Re: Bug#617466: marked as done (release-notes: Instructions do not restart script after reboot.)

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:55:13PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Well, I just took care of it in r8572, and will take care of eventual > further unfuzzy if remaining translators don't check out the current > file before committing. Thanks David, I did not have time to do this myself. Regards Javi

Bug#618776: searching for hold will match packages with that name

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:23:42PM +, Owen Dunn wrote: > Package: release-notes > > Chapter 4 of the squeeze release notes asks one to search for holds > by typing: > > dpkg --get-selections | grep hold > > This will erroneously match any packages whose names contain the > string `hold' Pro

Bug#619431: release-notes: Upgrading sh from bash to dash requires changes to /etc/passwd.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:26:26PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > In any case after installing dash and using it as the default sh > I found that a number of users in /etc/passwd had /bin/sh as their > shell. Needless to say this did not go over well as all the bash > features like tab completion we

Bug#619177: Please mention that as of squeeze/6.0.1 XF86Config is not used anymore

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:32:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I was bitten by the fact that X in 6.0.0 *did* look at XF86Config > because I moved xorg.conf away after the upgrade, and the old XF86Config > leftover from sarge days made X fail to restart. I didn't expect that > people still will

Re: How to update Release Notes wrt #580887

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:21:46AM +0200, b...@bc-bd.org wrote: > So what is the procedure to add something to the release notes? It's documented in http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-about.en.html#bug-reports The package to use is 'release-notes'. Regards Javier sig

Re: r8957 - /manuals/trunk/Makefile

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:39:28AM -, taf...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > Author: taffit > Date: Fri Oct 28 01:39:27 2011 > New Revision: 8957 > > URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/?sc=1&rev=8957 > Log: > Remove project-history from publish target > > The project-history is now handled on t

Re: Inaccuracies in the documentation

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:41:22PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Maybe we should disable very outdated non-po4a based translations now. It would be best if we introduced a disclaimer (in the first page? in all pages?) that the translation is not up-to-date. That way people that might have an interest

Re: ddp build failed

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:42:12AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:52:29AM +, Debian Webmaster wrote: > [..] > > /srv/www.debian.org/ddp-svn/make.log-make[1]: Entering directory > > `/srv/www.debian.org/ddp-svn/trunk/debian-faq' > > /srv/www.debian.org/ddp-svn/make.lo

Re: DDP from its packages (Re: r8957 - /manuals/trunk/Makefile)

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:34:05AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > > Who has taken this decision? > > The web team (CCed) want to do this for quite some time already and > agreed about it last year during the sprint. We already began to take > care of these documentations one at a time when needed.

Problems building debian-faq to zh_CN

Hi, I'm trying to build (& upload) a new debian-faq release and I am unable to get the build to work with the zh_CN locale. svn-buildpackage fails miserably even with all the Build-Deps installed. Build breaks when generating the PostScript version. If I manually try to build it with debiand

Re: Who maintains manpages.debian.net?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > On 29/06/2012, Arno Töll wrote: > > On 29.06.2012 23:01, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > >> today I had a look at a section 3 manpage for unstable. I was > >> offered an outdated version. Where is "the right place to com

Bug#683424: Patch describing Multiarch

tag 683424 pending thanks On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:24:37PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > We need some introduction to multi-arch. > > Attached patch adds a basic introduction to Multiarch in the What's new > section, referring to the HOWTO for extended information for those who (...) > Perh

Bug#548336: restart gnome on squeeze2wheezy upgrades?

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > A restart of your desktop session is definitely desirable after a > squeeze -> wheezy dist-upgrade. Could you please provide some sample text, or should we run with the text that was present in the Squeeze Release Notes? > I even th

Re: manpages.debian.net issues?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:29:06AM -0500, Robert W. Oliver II wrote: > Just to check, here - do I still need to go ahead and do a build of this > locally for testing, or is this being addressed? I am trying to move the service to a different machine. Since I have not heard from DSA yet I will temp

Re: manpages.debian.net issues?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:29:06AM -0500, Robert W. Oliver II wrote: > Just to check, here - do I still need to go ahead and do a build of this > locally for testing, or is this being addressed? FWIW, I've setup a virtual server in the Debian Spanish mirror (ftp.es.debian.og - 82.194.78.250). Righ

Manpages.debian.org almost fully restored (was Re: manpages.debian.net issues?)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:01:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I note that manpages.debian.net is down. I asked DSA on IRC and they > said you haven't responded for their calls for help moving it to another > machine and that they would not be re-enabling it without responsive > maintainers for the s

Re: [Ddp-commits] r10388 - /manuals/trunk/java-faq/po4a/po/fr.po

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:56:32PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Le 16/05/2014 18:15, j...@users.alioth.debian.org a écrit : > > > URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddp/?sc=1&rev=10388 > > Log: > > > > French translation done by Kilic Ali-Firat > > and provided in > > https://lists.debian.org/debi

Re: Out of date man pages

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > It seems some man pages (I've not checked to what extent this goes) > from do not match the latest versions > from unstable. For example deb(5) or dpkg(1). This is now fixed, as I said there wer

Bug#771825: release-notes: Update information on non-systemd Jessie upgrades and installations

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:01:16PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > * The second "hunk" of the patch seems better suited for the > >installation-guide. The release notes concerns itself with upgrades > >and does not cover the debian-installer. > > Somebody was complaining that changing t

Bug#771825: [Fwd: Re: Bug#771825: release-notes: Update information on non-systemd Jessie upgrades and installations]

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:13:38PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi Osamu, > > I will make a modified proposal to the actual document. However there > is no installation-guide on this page: > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/ > > Where is it? The sources for the installation

manpages.debian.org back online

Dear colleagues, Thanks to help of DSA and after tinkering with the code (changes I will push to SVN soon) we have restored the manpages.debian.org service again. The new service aggresively caches the information to prevent spawning multiple CGI processes and using up resources in Glinka. This

Re: Updating the install manual info at the ddp web pages

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 10:47:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 02 January 2005 00:10, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > The information at http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#install > > seems rather outdated. Perhaps someone could prepare an updated > > entry? (This hasn't to be a direct pat

Could someone force the rebuild of securing-debian-howto on master?

I'm not sure who has access to master, but it seems that it's unable to regenerate the HTML files for the "Securing Debian Manual". Reviewing the publish logs [1] it just tries to install the HTML files without regenerating them even though the publised html files hold a date of back December.

Re: Could someone force the rebuild of securing-debian-howto on master?

Seems everythin is ok now, maybe some of the tweaks I tested worked out. Regards Javier PS: I actually have no way to know since master only holds the last cvs and webwml run..

Re: Typo

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:05:13PM -0800, Garvey, Patrick D wrote: > On http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-detailed.en.html > In "4.5.2 October 2000: Implementation of Package Pools" > packackge Thanks, fixed in CVS. Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Publishing Translated documentation

I'm surprised to see that we do not have yet a way to automatically published the translated documentation in the DDP to both release documentation and development documentation. What are needs to be dones for this to happen? I would contribute this work if someone just give some p

Re: Volunteer Raising Ugly Head... ;-)

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:55:30PM +0800, Onno Benschop wrote: > > >Another idea that's come up before is an FAQ for debian-user. > > This is the only suggestion I received, but jumping in head-first always > hurts, so may I ask if there are others who think this is a good idea? > I do

Re: Debian Manuals

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 02:34:50PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote: > To whom it may concern: > > I was browsing the Debian Documentation Project pages at > (http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp). > Are there any plans to release the manuals in a non http format? I've come > across a couple of manuals tha

Re: Docbase in policy

On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 03:12:54PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > > I'm no fan of the dhelp interface either, but at least it provides > > directories in /usr/share/doc/HTML/ which other browsers can point to, > > right? > > Aren't those created by doc-linux-html etc? No, doc-linux cr

Re: Seeking source rebuilding docs

On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 03:49:19PM +1000, Neale Banks wrote: > > I thought had documented it but he denied it. Too bad, so sorry! > > Ah, that explains the subsequent silence. But it was a nice dream, while > it lasted. > > I'll add my vote to any proposal to create documentation of correct usa

Re: Fwd: Re: Volunteer

> > 15.3 Securing your system > > Keep things up to date with apt-get > Don't run any services you don't need > Finding open ports with netstat > Firewalls > Read the "Debian Securing Manual" (at http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp) :) Javi

On DDP sub-projects

It seems to me that, even though the DDP project has its own work, there is increasing work in other localized documentation that might get translated (or not) into English. Examples: - the DDP-BR pointed out from w.d.o/doc/ddp - the Spanish contributed section documentation under

Re: On DDP sub-projects

On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:44:24AM +0800, Onno Benschop wrote: > I'm not sure I grasp all of what you describe, but I think what you're > saying is: > > - DDP writes documents in English that get translated after the fact. > - Others are writing documents in other languages. > - You are asking ab

Re: machine translations, debian odc in foreign langs..

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:48:33AM +0200, RIBNITZ Robert wrote: > Hello, > > Personally I think that rather than having the manuals autotranslated in > every conceivable language, we should rather work on _quality_ of the > translations. > > Very recently I looked at the spanish installation man

Debian Euro HOWTO (new document)

Just today I have written an "Debian and Euro HOWTO" in order to summarise some of the ideas that have been around in the mailing lists for quite some time and have become some of a FAQ. I intend to provide a way to automatically configure the euro support in Debian (not as easy as it seems) and

Re: Como hago para actualizar los paquetes

Please send spanish requests to debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org (this list is only english-speakers). Also, read the Debian Dselect manual in order on how to install packages in Debian ... Javi On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 06:52:48PM -0300, Ernesto Grassi wrote: > Soy nue

Re: Debian Euro HOWTO (new document)

> > > > Just today I have written an "Debian and Euro HOWTO" in order > > to summarise some of the ideas that have been around in the mailing > > lists for quite some time and have become some of a FAQ. > > Oh, I see you did reuse some code from my mini-Howto. I made some small > improvements,

Re: Second draft of Woody release notes

Great work! In any case, some comments: Chapt1 What's New on Debian 3.0 should have a New architectures introducing the text. The reason for this is that the architectures text seems to be an introduction to the chapter, but is, however, a section of the same entity as the installation

Provide PDF/TXT version on the DDP?

We currently only provide HTML for development documents linked from the pages under http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp. However, I have lately seen some people ask if full-HTML/PDF/TXT versions could be provided for offline reading (i,e printing at home) versions. Is it ok if I change

Re: Provide PDF/TXT version on the DDP?

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:11:07PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Yeah, klecker won't mind building the txts or PDFs, unless they need more > tetex-whatever packages installed -- that's going to have to be handled on a > case-by-case basis. Well, really, since it's all debaindocsgml it cou

Re: Debian Euro HOWTO, other formats?

IIRC. Even if not linked, the euro howto can be accessed in PDF format from www.debian.org. In any case the experimental 'euro-support' packages do include the documentation in many formats. I intented to move the 'euro-support' packages from experimental to unstable over the weeken

Re: Release notes

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:47:41PM +, Rob Bradford wrote: > Can you grab my latest attempt at the release notes from > http://people.debian.org/~robster/release-notes.sgml > > These are based on teh cvs versions for potato, i need some assistance in > unbreaking the mess i seem to have made. N

Debian 3.0 release information

Regarding the message you sent to Debian devel (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200111/msg01451.html) I was thinking if you could coordinate with Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (who has published sample release notes for woody at http://people.debian.org/~robster/release-n

Re: Release notes

BTW. I find that a very fine thing to do when writting about how Debian has grown over the last year is to read the Debian Weekly News that have been published during that time as well as the notes published under debianplanet.org in order to find out what has changed/will change in the future. F

Re: Release notes

On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > (BTW addition of the woody release documentation will mean 110 MB more for > the web site mirrors -- I asked the maintainers and none of them complained. > Looks like there shouldn't be any worry about your events posters, either :) >

Re: Release notes

On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:49:10PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > > I did see the announcement. > > Announcement? Well, mail, maybe the noun was not chosen properly. > > > Well, it turned out for the best. But it could have happened this way: a few > mirrors stop mirroring because

Re: Release notes

Were too? (my guess is the boot floppies CVS) Javi On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:00:27PM +, Rob Bradford wrote: > Okay, i commited the release notes to cvs. Next need to look at writing a > todo so we know exactly what we still need to do.

Re: Release notes

Could you please add the following ? (I sent you this comments on your first post) "Debian 3.0 is much more secure that previous releases. The base installation provides less unnecessary services that might be the target of attack, likewise Debian 3.0 includes many more security applications,

Re: Release notes

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:13:48AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > Here are some suggestions to clean up the language a bit. > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:36:39PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > > "Debian 3.0 is much more secure that previous relea

Re: Release notes

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:52:09AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > hardening and intrusion detection. The packaging system has also been > > improved so it can be configured to automatically check digital > > signatures. Thus, it will refuse to install packages from Debian that > > do not verify corre

Opening a new CVS section in the DDP

¿Could I open a new section in the DDP CVS area for articles? The main idea behind this section is that, unlike the manuals, articles are bound to get obsolete but are quite useful for both users and developers: a) when they are published since they give an overview of information maybe less in

Re: Euro.

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:34:21AM +0100, Thomas Wesley Hinton wrote: > Hi, > > You said: > > "(most of Europe)" > As someone else said, even if the currency will not be used by all the countries, all other might need to read/write documents talking about the euro (even if only to bash

Re: Euro Howto ? Hm Hm

. Thanks and have a happy new year, best regards Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:30:00PM -0500, Guylhem Aznar wrote: > Hello, > > While I did really appreciate your document, you completely forgot to mention > it is heavily based on some of

Re: euro symbol in XEmacs

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:06:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Ville Nummela wrote: > > The Debian Euro HOWTO seems quite good, however I didn't see any > > mention about XEmacs in it. Here's how I got it working in woody: > > > > Add the following lines i

Re: DocBook vs. DebianDoc

Seconded. One thing Debiandoc lacks and IMHO is somethings pretty important is the support of inline figures. In any case, if we want to use Docbook we should also say *which* DTD we want to use. Otherwise people would be using completely different DTDs which

Re: Euro howto and cent sign

Ummm.. didn't know about this. Will fix in the documentation I will check the EU documentation first in order to see if it mentions an euro cent symbol anywhere... Javi On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:45:17PM +0200, Jarno Elonen wrote: > Hi, > > I just went through a brieg email

Re: your mail

Thanks for the info. I have just fixed it by changing to the new link (after a Google search, it currently is http://trustees.sourceforge.net/) Regards Javi On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:57:39PM -, Coles, Richard wrote: > I couldn't work out which package (if any) to subm

Eurosign or currency in X11 keyboard? (for the Debian-euro-HOWTO)

It seems that there might be a "bug" in the "Debian Euro Howto" a user just sent this and it seems that, in order to configure properly the X keyboard the euro character is (now) represented with the "EuroSign" name not "currency". It seems it has changed in some Xfree version but I'm not really s

Re: Bug#128852: doc-linux-text: Suggested addition to package: rank newbie pointers

You might want to take a look at 'ayuda' it is a (rather outdated) script which runs a user through some menus in order to explain him stuff of his system. 'Ayuda' BTW is 'help' in Spanish. Debian package is available, and some people at laespiral.org are working in a common framew

Re: cvs commit to ddp/manuals.sgml/euro-support by joy

On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 05:45:07PM -0800, Debian Doc Project CVS Master wrote: > Repository: ddp/manuals.sgml/euro-support > who:joy > time: Sat Jan 12 17:45:07 PST 2002 > > > Log Message: > > removed duplicate section (WTF?) > Seems to have happened due to the changes I m

Re: Eurosign or currency in X11 keyboard? (for the Debian-euro-HOWTO)

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:03:54PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > (...) > > Can anyone confirm or deny this issue? > > is it > keycode 26 = e E EuroSign > > or > keycode 26 = e E currency > Hate to reply myself but: - Xfree 3.3.

Re: Why don't we every see Debian articles on these sites?

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:20:46PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On 25 Jan 2002 08:55:49 -0800 > > > > Ok, sounds great. Who can we submit it to? > Eduardo Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote that article for Revista do Linux... > He's a Debian Developer, it is very easy to contact him (but

Re: Why don't we every see Debian articles on these sites?

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:07:33AM -0800, Bruce Byfield wrote: > Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > () > >please.) > > > Karl: > (..)> > > As a matter of fact, some of the media kit I wrote for Progeny might be > very useful for this purpose with a few changes. Progeny isn't using it > any more, a

Debian quickreference in DDP?

gree I can commit it to the DDP CVS server. Best regards Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Debian quickreference in DDP?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:39:24PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Please commit it to DDP CVS and link its web page to the Debian web > site. Will do. Dont' worry about updates, you can send me the translated sgml files and the original so I update the CVS server. > > Few problems I see i

Re: Debian quickreference in DDP?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:16:09PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Question for building web page (Makefile): > (...) > > Is this OK? (By now, I subscribed again to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Debian does not need PHP since this feature (Content-Negotiation) is performed by the Apache server. Se

Re: acceso remoto

Please send this to the debian-user-spanish mailing list. In any case this list talks (in English) about Debian documentation, we are not aware of ADSL modem configuration like the ones you talk about as they are not part of Debian GNU/Linux. Regards

Re: Debian quickreference in DDP?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:39:24PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Thank you for your invitation to DDP. I will be happy to accept it. > (...) > > If you need full CVS access to qref.sf.net, please send me your sf.net > account name so I can provide CVS access at SF. > I have used anonymous

Re: Bad links in docs

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:38:55PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > If you maintain a document that is distributed on www.debian.org/doc/ > then you should check http://people.debian.org/~treacy/urlcheck/doc.en > for any bad links. > I will try and fix many of these issues, since they are m

Re: cvs commit to ddp/manuals.sgml/quick-reference by jfs

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:44:30PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:36:24AM -0800, Debian Doc Project CVS Master wrote: (...) > Thanks. Nice work. > > I did notice some hack you needed to do because of file name. Also > issues with Latex exists. I will start new thread of d

Re: LATEX environment for debiandoc

I'm very interested in this issues since I would like DDP to provide PDF documentation also in the manuals.html/ directory. Before activating LaTeX generation in the Makefiles, however, be sure that klecker (IIRC there is where the WWW is compiled) has all the neccesary software to cleanly

Re: Error in History of Debian Ch2

n Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:45:33PM -0200, Can Kavakl??o??lu wrote: > I am guessing that should be "Branden Robinson"? Yes, you are right. Fixed in CVS. Thanks for reporting this. Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Name typo

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:57:39AM -0500, Todd Lyons wrote: > RE page: > http://www.us.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-leaders.en.html > > "Branden Robison was elected in April 2005 and is our current leader." > > It's "Robinson", isn't it? Yes, this was spotted and fixed already (in C

  1   2   3   4   5   >