Bug#1004862: neglected note in dist-upgrade documentation, section 4

Control: tag -1 pending patch Hi all, On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:16:24 +0100 "L.Schmidt" wrote: Package apt-get is a placeholder for https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#backup as it's with apt-get dist-upgrade that the potential problem manifests. The p

Processed: Re: neglected note in dist-upgrade documentation, section 4

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending patch Bug #1004862 [release-notes] neglected note in dist-upgrade documentation, section 4 Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 1004862: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004862 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#992185: marked as done (release-notes: Confusion with "apt full-upgrade" and "apt-get dist-upgrade")

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 21:35:43 +0100 with message-id <8745f694-a614-c7db-bd7e-fa04b0aa3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#992185: release-notes: Confusion with "apt full-upgrade" and "apt-get dist-upgrade" has caused the Debian Bug report #992185, regarding release-notes: Confu

Bug#990086: release-notes: deprecations not obvious from table of contents [was: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead]

Control: close -1 Hi, On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:42:58 +0300 Andrei POPESCU wrote: Control: retitle -1 release-notes: deprecations not obvious from the table of contents Control: severity -1 minor On Du, 20 iun 21, 09:40:14, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I suggested wording for it in Bug#9807

Processed: Re: Bug#990086: release-notes: deprecations not obvious from table of contents [was: apt-key is deprecated in bullseye, how to manage keys instead]

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #990086 [release-notes] release-notes: deprecations not obvious from the table of contents Marked Bug as done -- 990086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990086 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#987017: recommends 3 different ways to find obsolete packages, pick one

Hi On 15-04-2021 19:39, Antoine Beaupré wrote: I actually forgot that bullseye itself introduces yet another one: apt list ~obsolete But (I'm running bookworm): paul@mulciber ~/release-team/release-notes $ apt list ~obsolete Listing... Error! E: input:2-9: error: Expected end of file

Bug#928642: marked as done (release-notes: please mention improved support in buster for Rockchip RK3328 and RK3399 devices)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 22:14:37 +0100 with message-id <0a0b2c77-521e-69fd-915b-b5111f9bb...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#928642: release-notes: please mention improved support in buster for Rockchip RK3328 and RK3399 devices has caused the Debian Bug report #928642, regarding

Bug#987017: recommends 3 different ways to find obsolete packages, pick one

On 19/12/2022 08:10, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi On 15-04-2021 19:39, Antoine Beaupré wrote: I actually forgot that bullseye itself introduces yet another one: apt list ~obsolete But (I'm running bookworm): paul@mulciber ~/release-team/release-notes $ apt list ~obsolete Listing... Error!