Hi Justin,
On 23-09-2021 21:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Maybe instead of (bug #985502):
>Support for the non-merged-usr layout will be dropped
>after Debian bullseye, so all users are doomed. DOOMED!
> we can add something like:
> "The Debian project is still deciding how to d
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, but the below text is appreciated.
On 30-09-2021 22:59, Andy Smith wrote:
> Thanks. I am not sure whether it fits in "Items not limited to the
> upgrade process" or under "Obsolescence and deprecation", but how
> about:
I think the second one makes more sense.
> The
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On 23-09-2021 21:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Maybe instead of (bug #985502):
> >Support for the non-merged-usr layout will be dropped
> >after Debian bullseye, so all users are doomed. DOOMED!
> >
Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> On 23-09-2021 21:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Maybe instead of (bug #985502):
>>>Support for the non-merged-usr layout will be dropped
>>>after Debian bullseye, so all users are doomed. DOOMED!
>>> we can add something like:
>>> "The Debian project is st
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 23-09-2021 21:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> "The Debian project is still deciding how to do this and how to migrate
>> existing systems as the proper solution isn't known yet." Yes, highly
>> frustrating, but it is reality.
>>
>> For reference:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debia
5 matches
Mail list logo
