Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

Don't we need a group on Salsa?

Hi, Javier has created a DDP project in Salsa (thanks!), but in GitLab a project seems to be equal to a git repository. We have several manuals etc., so we need several git repos, therefore a DDP group, or am I mistaken? Cheers

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:41:47AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-11 10:54, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Correction: There is even a ddp group, so I'll put it there: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddp/refcard > > Oops: ddp is not a group, but an empty repository. Indeed, g

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

On 2018-05-12 07:58, W. Martin Borgert wrote: (actually nothing) Uh, this happens, if I click on a mailto URL in Firefox and select mutt as MUA. Need to switch to w3m or lynx.

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Ideally refcard, faq, release-notes, project-history etc. would all be > standalone git repositories (after possibly being converted from svn to git) > at > salsa. D'accord. Question: - shall we have a "ddp" group on salsa.d.o with those repos, o

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hi, Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > On 2018-05-12 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > Ideally refcard, faq, release-notes, project-history etc. would all be > > standalone git repositories (after possibly being converted from svn to > > git) at > > salsa. > > D'accord. Qu

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:18:54AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > Ideally refcard, faq, release-notes, project-history etc. would all be > > standalone git repositories (after possibly being converted from svn to > > git) at > > salsa. >

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 12:16, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > If putting our repos under a "ddp" group means write-access to our repos is > shared, then I'm in favour of that: it'd save administrative overhead in the > long run. That's my understanding: We can give write access to non-DDs/non-DMs, as long as

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 01:11:40PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 12:16, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > If putting our repos under a "ddp" group means write-access to our repos is > > shared, then I'm in favour of that: it'd save administrative overhead in > > the long run. > > Th

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 12 May 2018 at 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić < joostvb-debian-doc-2018031...@mdcc.cx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:41:47AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > On 2018-05-11 10:54, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > > Correction: There is even a ddp group, so I'll put it there: > > > https

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

On 8 May 2018 at 15:26, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > > Tasks to do > I have moved the tasks over to the following Wiki page: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddp/wikis/Migration-from-Alioth Step 2 (Add all of DDP users to Salsa from Alioth) is done already, I manually added all the users e

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 12 May 2018 at 13:11, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 12:16, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > If putting our repos under a "ddp" group means write-access to our repos > is > > shared, then I'm in favour of that: it'd save administrative overhead in > the > > long run. > > That's my unde

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

On 11 May 2018 at 21:35, Marcos Fouces wrote: > Hello > > I've done some work on git migration. I started dumping the full svn repo > in order to check the full content [1]. I also mapped svn user with their > name and email. So there should be no problem in doing smoothly the rest of > the migra

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 16:02, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > It feels like we are not organising ourselves sufficiently. Is there any > way we can move the DDP (project) into the ddp-team (group)? > I only see an option to create a new project and I rather not duplicate the > work I did yesterday if it

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 12 May 2018 at 17:28, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-05-12 16:02, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > > It feels like we are not organising ourselves sufficiently. Is there any > > way we can move the DDP (project) into the ddp-team (group)? > > I only see an option to create a new project

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

El 12/05/18 a las 20:45, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino escribió: > > On 12 May 2018 at 17:28, W. Martin Borgert > wrote: > > On 2018-05-12 16:02, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > > It feels like we are not organising ourselves sufficiently. Is > there any >

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 22:13, Marcos Fouces wrote: > I already created 33 repos with obsolete documents destined to attic and Great, thanks! > six more for the following ones: > > * harden-doc > * release-notes > * project-history > * debian-faq > * java-faq > * hamradio-handbook > > I believe that some D

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 20:45, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > If I go to General -> Advanced I just see "Housekeeping" and "Rename > repository" options. No option to transfer the project apparently. This can be done only be users with "owner" rights, it seems. > Maybe an alternative to that is to expo

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

Hello Martin I tried to upload the repos but i couldn't. I assume that the values for remote are corrects: $ git remote -v origin  https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/hamradio-handbook.git (fetch) origin  g...@salsa.debian.org:ddp-team/hamradio-handbook.git (push) Greetings. Marcos El 12/05/18

Bug#869755: marked as done (debian refcard: remove auto-apt? (package is not in Stretch))

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2018 21:37:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#869755: fixed in refcard 10.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #869755, regarding debian refcard: remove auto-apt? (package is not in Stretch) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#874290: marked as done (refcard: [INTL:nl] Dutch po file for the refcard package)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2018 21:37:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#874290: fixed in refcard 10.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #874290, regarding refcard: [INTL:nl] Dutch po file for the refcard package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#872499: marked as done (debian-refcard: Outdated Swedish translation)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2018 21:37:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#872499: fixed in refcard 10.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #872499, regarding debian-refcard: Outdated Swedish translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processing of refcard_10.1_amd64.changes

refcard_10.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: refcard_10.1.dsc refcard_10.1.tar.xz debian-refcard_10.1_all.deb refcard_10.1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

refcard_10.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 21:06:09 + Source: refcard Binary: debian-refcard Architecture: source all Version: 10.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Documentation Project Changed-By: W. Martin Borgert

First git repos uploaded

Hi I uploaded all repositories but harden-doc because Javier already uploaded it at securing-debian-howto. I hope that all migrations were properly done! Now, I just need an attic with 33 repositories for the obsolete documents. Greetings, Marcos

Re: First git repos uploaded

On 2018-05-13 00:16, Marcos Fouces wrote: > Now, I just need an attic with 33 repositories for the obsolete documents. https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/attic