I was aware of this. But thank you anyhow.
Javi
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 02:18:06PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> I think you shoud have a loke at :
> A comparison of the deb, rpm, tgz, and slp package formats.
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp.html#t_sec6_q8
>
> Bye, Mt.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 11:28:50AM +0200, Arto Astala wrote:
> systems the FAQ should probably emphasize 'technical marketing' and
> tell why .deb is 'better than rpm'. Other valuable info would be how
---end quoted text---
Just a personal opinion to throw in here... I don't think we should
take t
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> [found an RPM-HOWTO in LDP]
> detailing Redhat's package system and interface.
> I have recently written an article on the Debian package system
> (generic, not going into much detail) for a spanish magazine (Linux Actual)
> and I'm going to translate it t
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> [found an RPM-HOWTO in LDP]
> detailing Redhat's package system and interface.
> I have recently written an article on the Debian package system
> (generic, not going into much detail) for a spanish magazine (Linux Actual)
> and I'm going to translate it t
4 matches
Mail list logo