On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 00:38:38 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 07:57:04PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> > I think the advice for most users would be that they dont need to do
> > anything else
>
> Yes. My idea was that actually caring sites probably have something
> in place
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 07:57:04PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> I think the advice for most users would be that they dont need to do
> anything else
Yes. My idea was that actually caring sites probably have something
in place that is better then what existed before and what wtmpdb
provides.
Chri
Richard Lewis wrote:
> Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
>> util-linux used to ship three vaguely related programs: last, lastb, and
>> lastlog. In trixie, they are gone.
>
> Is this true on all architectures? (when this broke chkrootkit
> it only affected the 64-bit ones)
I'd missed your mention on th
Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
> util-linux used to ship three vaguely related programs: last, lastb, and
> lastlog. In trixie, they are gone.
Is this true on all architectures? (when this broke chkrootkit
it only affected the 64-bit ones)
Can i also check whether any attempt is made to delete th
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> util-linux used to ship three vaguely related programs: last, lastb, and
> lastlog. In trixie, they are gone.
[...]
> Please consider having some prominent warning in the release notes for
> trixie.
The warning should perhaps explicitly mention that wtmpdb can't read
th
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: util-li...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
util-linux used to ship three vaguely related programs: last, lastb, and
lastlog. In trixie, they are gone.
The fileformat and the programs are not Year-2038 safe, and the
involved upstreams do not want to f
6 matches
Mail list logo
