Re: [#599018 debian-faq] Section 10 (Debian and the kernel) is woefully out of date

Control: tags -1 + pending Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > > > I'm looking to work on this long standing bug against debian-faq: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599018 > > > > > > I would appreciate a review, since the bugreport is more than 5 years > > > old: > > > is

Re: [#599018 debian-faq] Section 10 (Debian and the kernel) is woefully out of date

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking to work on this long standing bug against debian-faq: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599018 > > > > I would appreciate a review, since the bugreport is more than 5 years old: > > is t

Re: [#599018 debian-faq] Section 10 (Debian and the kernel) is woefully out of date

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking to work on this long standing bug against debian-faq: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599018 > > I would appreciate a review, since the bugreport is more than 5 years old: > is this all still relevant/true ? > > > Quoting t

[#599018 debian-faq] Section 10 (Debian and the kernel) is woefully out of date

Hi, I'm looking to work on this long standing bug against debian-faq: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599018 I would appreciate a review, since the bugreport is more than 5 years old: is this all still relevant/true ? Quoting the bug submitter: 10.1: The libc kernel headers