On Oct 31, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I consider this a bug, and even release-critical, and would say that
> ca-certificates should use ucf to maintain the certificates in
I don't. I think that symlinks to files somewhere are a good way to
solve this specific problem.
> /etc/ssl
On Nov 02, Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other question: do all variants of this device require firmware from the
> driver, or only some of them? (Just asking because several other ralink
> cards,
> such as rt2500, do not seem to require the driver to supply firmware.) If
> som
On Nov 02, Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than that, I would like to see non-versioned close messages
> depriciated, other than ones that are explicitly so. No change would
> be needed for the majority of cases, only the rare "not a bug" close
> message would need to be differe
3 matches
Mail list logo