Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
> I noticed this happens often to me too, and I can assure you it’s not a > GDM bug. The Linux VT interface wrongly reports vt7 as being in use, > before gdm is even started. It does not happen on all systems, so it > might be related to KMS - for example it happens with my radeon-based > system. >

Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
I am using gdm and not gdm3. If you can give me more details as to why you think it is a kernel bug that would be good ^ ^ (also the ordering of this bug report on the website rather weird...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug. Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out! I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more! We so then the question is what happens if it is 'busy' and we attempt to use it anyways ;) ? -- To UNSUBS

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-18 Thread dave b
On 18 November 2010 23:14, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:41:37AM +1100, dave b wrote: >> So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug. >> Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out! &g