On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 01:44, Joel Baker wrote:
> Appropriate? As much as any of the Valar would be; he's certainly on the
> list. But since we know of at least 4 active ports, one name isn't going to
> be enough...
I would hope whatever name chosen is pronounceable, spellable, reasonably
short
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 17:21, Joel Baker wrote:
> Point #4: For at least the one proposed name ('Nienna'), it is, in fact,
> representable (properly) in US/ASCII. Even the rest are all representable
> in a clearly identifiable degenerate form (that is, no worse than many
> Europeans already have t
the
stable version -- but I'd argue that the resulting binary is not much
like the original "stable" one.
--
thanks,
Will
ebase, it's hard to make any valuable
claims about the resulting product if the "backport" changes more than
a few lines of code.
--
thanks,
Will
On Friday 18 April 2003 16:15, Colin Walters wrote:
> Perhaps I've been overly strong with the rhetoric. Let me give two
> realistic scenarios where this "manage foo with debconf?" fails.
Also the scenario:
3) Guy who has to install lots of boxes that aren't desktops
I have to arrange for the i
> if you leave at least one symlink in at least one runlevel, even if
> its a K link in runlevel 0 or 6 update-rc.d will refuse to add any new
> links. policy requires the use of update-rc.d so packages can't add
> any links so long as you leave at least one. if you find a pa
> That's a good hack, but I still think update-rc.d should support it
> directly. I was surprised to see portmap restarted after an ugrade when
> I'd previously done "update-rc.d -f remove portmap".
That was my feeling, that most users would probably wonder why it was
started again.
probably
safe to say that running Debian without an MTA is "unsupported".
Will
lhost only, or not listen on
Sure, don't run the daemon at all. When you install exim, "rm
/etc/init.d/rc?.d/S*exim" and it won't start. Local processes will be
able to send mail via the /usr/sbin/sendmail link, and there's a cronjob
in /etc/cron.d/exim that'll try to cl
an.org/~lowe/aptwatcher) and each box will mail you
when you need to do something to it.
--
thanks,
Will
thanks,
Will
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
> velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist bugs) but
a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone who knows jikes have
any idea if this can be fixed soon, or is it a bi
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 3:42 pm, Will Newton wrote:
> > ilisp
>
ilisp is in fact fixed, it's just the bug has not been closed yet due to a
typo in the changelog. I'll email the maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
(I have CCd to debian-devel in case you are on holiday or otherwise
indisposed to close these)
ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not
closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not
closed:
125744
140049
138669
137011
98132
12885
Quite simple fixes:
- Fixes build on hppa and quite possibly others.
- Bump version number to replace older packages correctly. (RC bug)
- Fix a minor bug in the description.
Packages and diff are here:
http://www.misconception.org.uk/will/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
The changelog looks like this:
ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
> tag them "fixed", by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote:
> Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is,
> why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer
> closing them.
OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 7:35 pm, Will Newton wrote:
> Quite simple fixes:
>
> - Fixes build on hppa and quite possibly others.
> - Bump version number to replace older packages correctly. (RC bug)
> - Fix a minor bug in the description.
>
> Packages and di
ive. Now it should be possible to package newer
versions, but beware that libxml2 currently has an RC bug so libxslt will be
blocked until that is fixed.
I'm not sure if Nicholas reads this list, I had no success contacting him
previously.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Tuesday 16 Apr 2002 4:04 am, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Well, it seems that you almost need 4.2.0 for Woody anyway, if it is
> going to work with any recent hardware (unless you are aiming for
> servers only). Or are you going to hack 4.2.0 display drivers into 4.1.0?
As it happens 4.2.0 seems
Hi all,
Due to the recent changes in keyring policy I need to get some
signatures on my 4096bit key. I'm going to be attending Linaro Connect
next month where I hope there should be a few DDs who I can either
track down individually in the hallways or if anyone else is in the
same situation as me
Ts'o wrote:
So what? If you write to a normal file system, it goes into the page
cache, which is pretty much the same as writing into tmpfs. In both
cases if you have swap configured, the data will get pushed to disk;
That's not at all the same, the page cache is more temporary, it's
?
Would you be interested in publishing it on your site? I’ll share your post
across our social media accounts and promote it free of charge; it will be
substantial.
Best,
Will
--
Will Moyer
Blogpros.com
Content creation and blog management
Goswin von Brederlow Sun, April 3, 2011 5:17:06 PM
> Philipp Kern writes:
>
>> On 2011-04-03, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> OTOH, do you really want to type
>>> "apt-get install package-with-policy-compliant-utterly-long-silly-name"?
>>> There's a point when package name lengths become problemati
disk and then addusering for a while)
to get dpkg to reinstall _just_ the /etc/ files from each of the packages
listed as installed? Then, is there some way to get it to run all the
postinst scripts?
subject says it all...
Will
--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe
I've just installed Jim Pick's Gnome .20 .debs and they're all complaining
that libungif.so.3 can't be found. Where would it be? There's no
libungif package, according to www.debian.org/packages.html.
thanks,
not.
Thanks for your help. I'm assuming that "libungif" is some sort of
freeware clone of "libgif"?
Will
--
trouble for that
one), Debian Wall
Trees? Oak, Maple ...
How long is debian going to be around? There are literally millions of
species of insect ...
FSViewer is a NeXT filesystem browser. It's available from
someplace under http://www.csn.ul.ie/~clernong/ (I'd give an exact link
but I don't seem to be able to connect to that host right now...)
http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml
Did we already have a discussion about this?
Will
--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Will Rouesnel
* Package name: tlog
Version : 3
Upstream Author : Nikolai Kondrashov
* URL : http://scribery.github.io/tlog/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Terminal I/O recording and playback
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
