On Saturday 23 October 2004 05:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Your ability to
> ask for features in the software programs that you use is one of the
> advantages of libre/free software.
Errm, can't you do so with any piece of software out there? The advantage of
free software is that you can do it your
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 22:47, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Debian-devel is now result number four when googling for "callwave
> > remove" (without quotes).
>
> Ah, the Duelling Banjos Effect.
>
Weird, I wouldn't jugde this people capable of using google for solving
problems their minds can't fat
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> other bios
[snip]
I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the bios
that is already present on most computers?
Wouldn´t that reduce the dependen
On Monday 02 June 2003 23:31, Sean Egan wrote:
> "If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls
> to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single
> program, so plug-ins must be treated as extensions to the main program.
> This means they must be rele
On Thursday 19 June 2003 08:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> The upstream author is not so happy about the FIFO controlled stuff,
> since it sounds as if using quark is difficult.
Right, the FIFO(implementation) is irrelevant for most users.
> I was thinking of something along the lines of :
>
> Descrip
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 17:46, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Description: audio player, for geeks, by geeks.
> > Mmm, doesn't sound all that descriptive.
>
> But hardly because of the removal of the "an".
> (i.e. what business has "by geeks for geeks" rather than something
> inf
On Sunday 22 June 2003 19:45, Isaac Jones wrote:
> There has been a lot of discussion recently on the Haskell mailing
> lists about the best ways to package Haskell libraries and tools for
> Debian. The main issues are:
>
> 1) there are a variety of "compiler" implementations, one of which is
> an
On Thursday 10 July 2003 18:35, Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> * License : GPL2
> Description : linux audio developers configuration and connection API
>
> LADCCA is a session management system for JACK and ALSA audio
> applications on
On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:55, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> I have to log out a user who is logged in via ssh. The information that
> he is not allowed to login comes from the utmp-file like the pid to
> kill.
Not sure if that helps, but 'slay' might be the proper tool for it.
Uli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:06, David Smith wrote:
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> Content-Type: text/html;
[ dsmith_sig1.GIF]
people here tend to regard stuff like your mail as spam already ...
Uli
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 11:08, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > I do not intend to play BTS games here; if you change the severity back
> > to grave, or to any other RC state, I will consider it to be abuse of
> > the BTS and report your actions to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 01:48, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Mike Hommey dijo [Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:28:44AM +0200]:
> > Maybe I'm wrong, but I think an MTA rejecting a mail because of oversized
> > body doesn't have to get the whole body before rejectin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 22:10, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
> > The cdcat is a graphical (QT based) multiplatform (Linux/Windows)
> > catalog program which scan your directoryes/driv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
> www.gmane.org for details.
I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access
On Friday 16 August 2002 21:47, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How would this work? Would those using gcc-2.95 software have to set an
> > rpath or $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to take advantage of the compat libs? If so,
> > it hardly seems worth the effort; manual
On Saturday 30 November 2002 16:48, Russell Coker wrote:
[snipped rant and threats]
> ... if such messages continue.
You misunderstood the way such things work, you only have to confirm once
that you intended to send a message. Of course, people should add automated
systems like the BTS to their
and mail to console-data. If not, you don't have a problem. :)
regards
Ulrich Eckhardt
Hi Ari!
Not really relevant but www.reallyslick.com points to rss-glx.sourceforge.net
which seems to be a second independant port to X11. Also, that page even
supplies Debian-packages (though only for i386 and PPC).
Did you compare the two ports and what are their differences ?
cheers
Uli
On Thursday 10 April 2003 03:12, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I think generic 64bit libraries should put on {/lib64, /usr/lib64/,
> /usr/local/lib64, /usr/X11R6/lib64, ...}. Debian 64bit architecture
> packages should have only 64 bit libraries because it saves storage,
> and once we prepare 64bit port,
On Thursday 10 April 2003 08:57, Marc Singer wrote:
> int func_b (void** ppv)
> {
> *ppv = (void*) 2;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> char* test (void)
> {
> char* pa = NULL;
> func_b (&(void*)pa);
creates a pointer-to-void, copies the value of pa into it and then takes the
address of that new obje
On Sunday 20 April 2003 22:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If the upstream author is rude to me, he does not deserve any
> consideration from myself. If he chooses to alienate his clientele,
> he should expect to reap what he sowed.
Buit, this doesn't get any problems solved. Using 'an
bug).
Lastly, find out where the broken and working libdb++s come from, esp that
neither of them are out of date.
In case you couldn't find anything, sync your sources.list and 'apt-get
install --reinstall libdb3++ libdb3++-dev g++ ....'. This wont really help
finding the error though.
happy hacking
Ulrich Eckhardt
On Friday 27 April 2001 20:49, Dale E Martin wrote:
> #include
use
#include
cheers
U
> #include
should be
#include
> #include
should be
#include
for the rest, apply either of the proposed solutions by Tellef Fog Heen.
cheers
Uli
On Monday 24 December 2001 13:32, Erik Steffl wrote:
> I am trying to make the USB work on my debian unstable system, using
> kernel 2.4.14 and it just doesn't work. the specific problem is that the
> function 'probe' (specified when registering driver) is NEVER called and
> therefore driver does
On Friday 28 December 2001 07:44, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Package: foiltex
> > Description: A collection of LaTeX files for making foils.
> > A number of features are built-in including large sans serif font
While you're at it add a comma here^
> > - normal font, options for setting nor
Hi all,
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a new
version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is > a year
old.
what should I do/can be done?
Uli
eed, fellows, the hardware support-page is a bit hidden ...
> Christian Banik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebenfalls Hamburg, also wenn Du Probleme mit der Installation hast
:-)
Ulrich Eckhardt
On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:26, King "Leo (Martin Oberzalek)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it's not possible linking a C++ library compiled with g++-2.9x to a C++
> application compiled with g++-3.0.
>
> We all no the reasons...
>
> My question is how I should handle this, on debian distributions that
> are
1 ldso (>= 1.9.7-0)
libbz2 0 libbz2
/lib/ld-linux 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
ld-linux 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
libdl 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
libpam_misc 0 libpam0g (>= 0.72-1)
libpamc 0 libpam0g (>= 0.72-1)
thanks,
Ulrich Eckhardt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
