On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:40:22 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages,
> which all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a
> bug filed about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:39 -0500
"Dale C. Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus it might be even better to define a policy the following way:
> >
> >1. Put all XPMs for the use in Debian-Menu into
> > /usr/share/menu/pixmaps
> >2. Put all PNGs (and others) into /usr/share
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:47:34 + (GMT)
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just configured the tree with debconf, by create a
> package, but when i try to build a package the
> makefile is required. I choose single package.
>
> Skipping copying to script-gera-banco-1.4.o
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:54:40 + (GMT)
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> Yes I read this link, and i take a example of
> changelog. After, the error messange was the same.
> Then i try the below command.
>
> sky:~/script-gera-db-1.4# dh_gencontrol
> dh_gencontrol: C
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:54:40 + (GMT)
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> Yes I read this link, and i take a example of
> changelog. After, the error messange was the same.
> Then i try the below command.
>
> sky:~/script-gera-db-1.4# dh_gencontrol
> dh_gencontrol: C
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:45:06 -0500
"alfredo diega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lastly, suspend doesn't work with Debian but does with Dapper.
What kind of suspend? suspend-to-ram (S3), (user space) software
suspend to disk? How do you trigger it?
FWIW, the kernels in dapper and unstable both ha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tim Dijkstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pm-utils
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richar
Op Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:41:01 +0200
schreef "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Provides simple shell command line tools to suspend and hibernate
> > computer that can be used to run ve
Op Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:28 +0100
schreef Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not that I actually object to the package, but why can't HAL let acpid
> manage acpi events? I am continually confused by the profusion of
> packages that offer to work around acpid in order to provide the
> functional
Op Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:04:40 +0200
schreef Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:41:01PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > Provides simple shell command line tools
Op Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:29:14 +0100
schreef Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This one time, at band camp, Tim Dijkstra said:
> > Op Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:28 +0100
> > schreef Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > The advantage HAL has over acpid, is
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:39:07 -0500
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > That is a problem if I want to server everything up out of LDAP.
> > There really should be a "reserved" range, maybe 100-499 of Debian
> > gids, where they are assigned in a predertmined way
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:26 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:36:56AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > That is no longer a reality with groups like plugdev, powerdev and
> > netdev, which users need to be a member of to be able t
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:08:29 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:33:43AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > Hmm, pam_group doesn't sound to secure to me... what if on one machine
> > gid 110 is www-data and on another plugdev.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:10:42 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > That's not an argument someone can just 'chown :plugdev' something.
>
> Crap. I knew I'd overlook somet
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:12:20 +0200
Gernot Salzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't mechanisms like libpam_devperm grant exclusive access?
> On login the ownership of the devices is set to the console user,
> and only the owner is granted rwx-rights. On logout
> ownership/permissions of the devic
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:31:37 +0200
Gernot Salzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First, there is no safe way to revoke privileges from a user. If a user
> > gets access to a certain group he/she can arrange ways to keep it,
> > even after being logged out (make a suid binary for example).
>
> I
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:42:50 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/23/06 07:09, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> >> >from the bash manpage:
> >> /dev/tcp/host/port
> >> /dev/udp/host/port
> >
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:18:35 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > The LFS intent of separating /usr/share and /usr/lib is to allow a
> > filesever to export /usr/share to machines of *any* architecture
> > running the same OS
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:49:37 +0200
Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> shouldn't pmount-hal & hald respect something like
>
> type="bool">true or
> type="bool">true
>
> for removable storage devices for example?
> I'm not sure which would be the correct one. An
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:37:21 +0200
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:02 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
> > > Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no idea
> > > why GNU mode behavior sho
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
> >
> >
> > And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-)
>
> It doesn't really w
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's
> load and usage.
huh?
My top shows (admittedly not on my desktop machine;) shows:
15:31:22 up 50 days, 2:41, 2 users, load ave
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:41:05 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to
> help debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding
> small applications for this purpose. they could help some.
Y
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:25:39 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Ju
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:09:41 -0500
Kevin McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are two problems: first, the license [1] forbids redistribution
> of modified binaries without permission of the authors, which some
> have argued makes it unsuitable even for non-free [2]; second, and
> worse, the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:28:27 +0200
Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Petter Reinholdtsen
>
> > - Preconfigure the packages we install
> >
> > I believe the best option would be to extend all the packages
> > we use to make it possible to configure everything we need
> >
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:50:28 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker) wrote:
> That's over two months (and two releases) old. The current galeon in
> unstable is 1.3.7.20030813-1, which has the "Add bookmark to" submenu
> at the top of the bookmark menu.
Huh?!? well I must be blind then
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a DEC Alpha 1000/4 and a DEC Alpha 2100/4 (sable) that could be
> stand a linux install on them. .
> The 2100 would be the nasty one to get it to work on. They both
> require milo, the sable has never booted
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:01:57 -0500
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a DEC Alp
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:17:27 +0200
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. The problem is important not only for libnss-db package but also
> for libnss-ldap, libnss-mysql and others.
>
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libnss_db.so.2 | grep /usr
> libdb-4.3.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.3.so (0xb7e100
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:23:41 +0200
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 of August 2005 11:35, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > $ ldd /usr/lib/libnss_db.so.2 | grep /usr
> > > libdb-4.3.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.3.so (0xb7e1)
> > >
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:57:48 +1000
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (I have seen a system that appears to run ntpdate on startup before
> the network is configured - but it hasn't bothered me enough to
> investigate why yet.)
I had one which needed working pcmcia for the network. Pcmcia i
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:51:30 +1000
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Anyway, if it's recompressing like I think, there's no way to get the
> same compressed md5sum -- even if the information could be
> transferred, there's no guarantee the local gzip _can_ produce the
> same output as the remote gzip -- ima
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:46:45 +0100
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2) the Debian menu requires xpm icons [2] and in fact only 4 packages
> >have icons in the png format (ekiga, evince, gimp, gnomemeeting),
>
> To be fair, the .p
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:03:15 +0100
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just FYI, I *personally* would prefer an evince entry in the menu as
> well, but I prefer keeping close to the usability policy defined by
> upstream.
Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behavio
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:51:29 +0100
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The presence in the menu has to be weighted against the cluttering.
>
> If I search for a program, I go to the menu list, not on Nautilus
> (obviously this is my personal behavior, which can surely be different
> Fro
Hi,
We need a directory, which is accessible very very early during boot.
It has some files in it which are regenerated at regular intervals, but
not (necessarily) during boot. Actually we know generate it during
runlevels 0 and 6.
For know we put this in /lib/$package. I'm not sure this OK, beca
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:55:53 +0100
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:22:51PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:03:15 +0100
> > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just FYI, I *personally* would p
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:28:06 +0100
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having eog and evince in the menu serves the "I want to look at a file I
> know I have on my disk" case. But you can open the file in the same
> number of clicks but with a better interface, by launching a nautilus
>
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:10:55 +0200
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything that I can do about it? Tuning the ext3 partition? Or is
> somebody capable of turning the info directory into - say - an sqlite
> database or in future Debian releases?
There is a thread on debian-d
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:49:54 +0200
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > That is not really a valid reason either because converting a timestamp
> > from a changelog entry to any other timezone or format is trivial:
> >
> >
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:53:42 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For laptops brand/model would be nice, although it probably will be
> difficult or impossible to include that in an automated fashion.
No it wouldn't. Most laptops have usable information in their smbios
which. S
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:13:25 -0700
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On to, 2007-05-03 at 13:39 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> My ideal output format would just list "subsystem OK"
>
> > While we're daydreaming, I'd like an empty screen w
On Wed, 9 May 2007 17:49:18 -0300
"André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> The user can put the follows categories:
> - Wallpaper
> - Splash screen
> - Icon
> - System sound
> - Logo
> - Usplash
> - T-shirt
> - Screenshot
> - Generic
>
> What do you think?
> We
On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:50:02 +0100
Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dom, 2007-05-13 às 00:43 +0200, Tim Dijkstra escreveu:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2007 17:49:18 -0300
> > "André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > &
Hi,
I maintain uswsusp. It is a package that relies on a binary on the
initramfs that will start the resume process. This binary (and some
other stuff) get installed via an update-initramfs call in the postinst.
On some updates, the new binary that suspends the system is
incompatible with the old
On Tue, 15 May 2007 23:54:02 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd appreciate if you post such questions to the corresponding
> development mailing list which is debian-kernel for initramfs
> questions.
> thanks
>
> > Current pratice is to only call `update-initramfs -u', that
On Fri, 18 May 2007 01:18:01 +0200
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:23:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >also sprach Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.2201 +0200]:
> >> Now what do people think is the best option?
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:41:41 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
>
> How about making the use of "-k all" configurable?
That seems like a good idea... bu
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:25:09 +0200
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > That seems like a good idea... but what would be the default?
>
> Doesn't matter as there are already examples of both b
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:48:54 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 425050 wontfix
> stop
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
> >
> > I created a patch to ask a debconf question (medium priority) if
>
On Sat, 19 May 2007 00:23:08 +0200
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> >On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:12:15AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >
> >> Good point. Thus it looks like there is no right way [...]
> >
> >How about maki
Please cc: the bug report
On Sun, 20 May 2007 16:35:27 +0200
David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >They can set their debconf priority. It's not something to avoid,
> >adding debconf questions
> >
> >Anyway, I propose that
Henning Glawe schreef:
> Moin,
> seems like in the dist-upgrade from etch to lenny is one very annoying
> (and old, AFAIR I hit it already in woody->sarge and sarge->etch)
> problem: perl is in an unusable state during the upgrade and causes
> maintainer scripts to fail.
>
> I was following way:
>
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:26 +0100
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>digitaldj
> => prokyon3
It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need to remove
it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, d
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:42:08 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > As this reaction is quite common, maybe I should make things more clear.
> >
> >* Yes, GTK+ 1.2 is going away before the squeeze release. *
> >
> > If everyon
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 41b0a520-c6c1-4e7b-8c49-74ee85faf242
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: Reaffirm the Social Contract
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]
> [ ] Choice 3: Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violat
Barry deFreese schreef:
> Hi folks,
>
> There are only 5 packages left that have reverse depends on gnome-libs
> packages. They are as follows:
>
> digitaldj: Removal request was filed but maintainer claims someone has
> done a Gtk2 port and saved it for now.
I thought this was a post-lenny thin
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:29:38 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: eaccelerator
> Version : 0.9.5.2
> Upstream Author : eaccelerator team http://eaccelerator.net/
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:11:33 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Given that acpi-support is going to be deprecated in favor of
> > pm-utils/hal [1] I'd rather see acpi-support removed from the
> > laptop-task completely.
> > [1] https://w
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:12:41 +0900
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> computational processing of Japanese texts. Unfortunately, its
> license has small violation of DFSG, as follows:
>
> Each User may also freely distribute the Program, whether in its
> original form or mo
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:44:46 +0200
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, IANAL and not a native speaker nor a regular debian-legal
> > reader, but I can't see what is exactly nonfree in this piece of
> > licence. In my reading it just says,
> >
> > 1) Do what you want with it
> > 2)
On 14 Nov 2003 13:18:02 +0100
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Each User may also freely distribute the Program, whether in
> > >
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:10:07 +1100
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 05:17, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:51:43 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > If the sub-project approach would mean that the new packages and
> > > enhancements would be folded
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:06:32 -0500
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I couldn't find any way to authenticate db.debian.org when using
> > direct LDAP(TLS doesn't seem to be supported), but nonetheless this
> > is damn convenient.
> >
> > (requires python-ldap)
>
> Or, for people who don
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:53:00 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:23:51PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
> > > I see no problem with this license as far as it goes, but it
> > > doesn't go far enough.
> > >
> > > There is no permission granted to make modificati
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:55:31 +0100
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, we can live without standard in main. I never read ISO C and POSIX
> standards (because these was non free (like free beer)). But
> I program GNU/Linux in C. Also the RFC are not enough free, but I see
> no probl
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:57:35 +0200
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:58:38PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > UnicodeData is different, because we need the data in our program,
> > > not only the ideas. And it this c
On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:53 +0200
Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:02:20 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
>
> > "Tormenta en un vaso de agua" in Spanish. So it seems that french
> > and spanish drink more water than tea.
>
> "Sturm im Wassergl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: muswsusp
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Machek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : htt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: liblzf-dev
Version : 1.51
Upstream Author : Marc Alexander Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.goof.com/pcg/marc/liblzf.html
* Lic
72 matches
Mail list logo
