On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying. But I didn't receive your response directly
> (by default the BTS doesn't send followup messages to the bug submitter) .
Sorry, hope you get it directly now ...
> I'm running KDE. icewm also appears to need the full path
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I used to tell everyone we need no fancy GUI for configuration as our
> postinst scripts take care of all that. All you need to know is
> dpkg-reconfigure if you want to change anything.
>
> That probably won't work with cups.
I´m really sure that debcon
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ari Makela wrote:
> Just about anyone who's not from English speaking countries. For
> example, we Finns need 'åäö' and their capital versions. They just
> don't work if you don't set locales right. If you take a look at even
> just European languages you can see that most of
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Michael Bramer wrote:
> OH, this is now the second 'remove me' request.
>
> Now the server can only mail notifications to all packages or to no
> packages. Should I stop it?
>
> Comments?
Example for a procmail rule in the information part?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Since this should probably be by-package and not by-maintainer, how
> about a field in debian/control? (I'm not sure it really belongs
> there, but there were some advantages if it were there; e.g. it can
> easily be controlled by the maintainer.)
If t
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> I have yet to meet a person who would ever need a slovak locale.
> Nobody cares at all (collate order? who needs that? Different
> format of numbers? This is not only unneeded, but even harmful.
> Different format of date? Who cares.. Gettext? Maybe, bu
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I never asked for a debconf interface (I explained in the bug report
But why not following Grisus suggestion?
In my opinion the problem is an obvious target for a debconf solution.
The user has just to press one times:
Do you want locales [y/N]
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:04:10PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > By the way: That lpadmin does not work seems to be a bug but a feature -
> > at least I had the same result as you. :-((
> > The web frontend worked for me after
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Corrupted filesystem, unlink that file and try again.
Hmmm, I have also a relict of older ReiserFS (from 2.4.4 or so) on
my HD (I´m so happy that I didn´t used it on a critical box and perhaps
never will do so ...):
/var/lug# whoami
root
/var/lug# un
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i would suggest the immutable flag, but AFAIK reiserfs has no such
> thing.
Even if it would have - I do not use such nifty things on a testing box ...
> sure someone isn't playing a joke on you and replaced /bin/su with
> fakeroot ;-)
:)
But I can rm an
On 14 Sep 2001, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> #92294: sysadmin-guide; Missing Build-Depends-Indep
I´m ready to upload a fixed package with the following changes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:54:54 +0200
Source: sysadmin-guide
Binary: sysadmin-guid
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
> I had the same problem, just worked out how to fix it, I used the chattr
> program, see the chattr man page for more details.
Could you please be a little bit more detailed?
# chattr -V -i postgres.log.7.gz
chattr 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/0
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tille, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010914 13:06]:
> > Maintainer: Debian QA team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* changed maintainer field to
> > Maintainer: Debian QA team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
> > # chattr -V -i postgres.log.7.gz
> > chattr 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> > chattr: Permission denied while trying to stat postgres.log.7.gz
>
> chattr -V -ai postgres.log.7.gz maybe?
It´s the same as above (and I expect it to stay so u
Hello,
any news from the Interbase Debian packages?
Kind regards
Andreas.
Hello,
I had a short e-mail exchange with the maintainer of the wxgtk packages
Ron Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> because I asked him, whether he would plan
a package for python2 because a program I want to pack depends from
it.
Ron isn´t actually a big user of wxPython himself and he said hi is quite
p
Hello,
a new year seems to be the right starting point for a new project :).
So here we are:
_ _ __ ___
| _ \ ___ | |__ (_) __ _ _ __ | \/ | ___ __| |
| | | | / _ \| '_ \ | | / _` || '_ \ _ | |\/| | / _
On 6 Jan 2002, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The same is the situation for pingus. I tried to email the maintainer
> 2001-12-23, no reply yet. No changes in > 260 days. Last upload was
> NMU. I've tried to email the one doing NMU after a bug squashing
> party in April 2001. Not sure what more
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> In the "research" category -- how about medical imaging? I have considered
> packaging the MINC tools from our lab (www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca) that are used
> in brain research. And someone else previously packaged (or at least sent
> an ITP) other tools
On 4 Jan 2002, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> I'm using LVM and XFS filesystems on my computer at home. This
> morning, after I pushed "g" from the Gnus *Group* buffer (to get new
> mail), it stopped part way through with an error message. Gnus
> prompted me in the XEmacs minibuffer saying "no sp
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So, dear co-developers, please join debian-mentors@lists.debian.org and
> respond to future maintainers, and sponsor those who are asking it.
> Also check out the sponsor page that is listing about 30 future
> maintainers who are looking for a sponsor :
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, James Bromberger wrote:
[at debian-private - but of course it can be also discussed open and so
I move here ...]
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:35:47AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > there were some rumors that there would be the Debian Conference 2
> &g
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Sounds good. Maybe we should provide a description of this technique
> somewhere within webml or ddp.
>
> WWW/doc folks: any hint about sponsorship uploading practices?
At least an FAQ would be apropriate in my opinion.
A better solution would be
Hello,
some time ago I did an NMU of MusixTex which was accepted by the
maintainer. I can't see any reason why this did not entered
testing:
~> madison musixtex
musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | sou
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> I have just uploaded for powerpc.
Thanks. Hamish wrote me he did it for hppa and I just did for sparc.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Will Lowe wrote:
> > Is there any deb available for it?
>
> Not currently. If there's a lot of demand I'll package it, but it
> seemed silly to bloat the Packages file further by making a .deb
> containing 139 lines of perl.
Why not fileing a wishlist bug against an apropriat
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Now that you got my suggested patches for the last part of i18n for apt,
> I wonder (once again): Are you going to try to get this into woody?
At least a test-suite would be great.
> If not, I plan to do something, I'm not sure what. I could NMU, but I
Hello,
second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
auric:~> madison musixtex
musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | source, arm, ia64, m68k, powerpc,
sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm excuriatingly busy with other things [0] until
> mid-February, so I just don't have time to pester three or four
> dozen people personally on a daily basis to get the release out. That
> *shouldn't* be necessary; just getting rid of the
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
> sh is somewhat deprecated at the moment due to a required
> decision wrt. sh3/sh4 and big/little endianess. No buildd
> is currently running for binary-sh because of this. Just
> stay tuned, the port will eventually continue.
I really do not care abou
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> and dput?
IMHO two tools with the same functionality are
1. confusing for users
2. waste of time for developers. T
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Welcome to the Free Software world.
Hmm, I've thought I would just be here. :)
> There are plenty of editors, MUA, MTA and so on because people
> want to have fun doing something (and often learning from this
> experience), even if i
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> > IMHO two tools with the same functionality are
> > 1. confusing for users
> > 2. waste of time for developers. They should spend their time
> > to make one better tool instead of two good tools.
>
> The implementation language really does make a
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Stop talking about one's time. I won't repeat myself.
The discussion started because someone stated that he has not enough
time. Moreover I talked about a second aspect: Confusing users.
I'll now save my time and stop posting to this thre
Hello,
in general I like the idea of descriptions of manpages. I would like it
even more if it would regard i18n descriptions which are produced by
the ddtp server.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Hello,
it would be nice if treetool could be available for all released architectures.
Cureently only ia64 is missing.
auric:~> madison treetool
treetool |2.0.2-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, powerpc,
sparc treetool |2.0.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386, m
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
> booting whatsoever.
I did just a quick look (no real install just booted and selected the
language) and I really like the i18n stuff!!!
Great job! Many thanks!
Kind regards
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
> Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
> a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
> NMU to update to version 5.03
Hello,
in the package clustal[wx]_1.82-3 I fixed a buffer overflow and sended the
fix upstream. I do not think that the problem is a real security risk but
in many cases clustalw does not perform correctly so that I think the
latest packages should go into testing. I wonder why it is sticked to
Hello,
auric:~> madison postgresql
postgresql | 6.5.3-27 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
postgresql |7.2.1-2 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excu
Thanks for the bug report.
I just want to know which window manager you are using. I did not found
any policy statement about default icon locations. The documentation
of menu states:
...
please put all icon files in the directory
`/usr/X11R6/include/X11/{bitmaps,pixmaps}'
and I
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> Speak now or hold your peace forever :)
Thanks for caring about this package!
Have a nice weekend
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42 matches
Mail list logo
