if you know what proportion of
> actual Linux users is registered at li.org.
If an anonymous registration is done in popcon package then a debconf
dialog should ask the user if he already has an account on
counter.li.org
Regards
--
Thomas Preud'homme (just a user)
Why Debian : h
Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008, vous avez écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008, RalfGesellensetter a écrit :
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> today I got a reminder from Linux Counter [1] to update my
> >> registration.
On mercredi 26 mai 2010 02:39:52 Raphael Geissert wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> Yes, $BASH_SOMETHING is just used to make it easier to see that the
> following code (probably a bashism) is only executed after checking the
> shell is actually bash. That and the other FP are the most common ones, yet
> not that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Thomas Preud'homme"
* Package name: ultracopier
Version : 0.2.0.15
Upstream Author : Herman Brule
* URL : http://ultracopier.first-world.info/contact.html/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: C+
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Thomas Preud'homme"
* Package name: gcp
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jérôme Poisson
* URL : http://www.goffi.org/index.php
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Advanced co
ted:
> 'Format','Upstream-Name','Upstream-Contact','Source','Disclaimer','Comment
> ','Copyright','Files','License','Format-Specification','Name','Maintainer',
> 'Upstre
gt; in the cross-distro dev room at FOSDEM in 2 weeks. Feel free
> to come by and let's discuss DEP5 or other possible applications.
>
>
> All the best
Thanks for this tool
>
> Dominique
Thomas Preud'homme
>
> [1] http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Model/
&g
Le mardi 22 février 2011 20:24:02, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
> Le mardi 22 février 2011 19:06:27, vous avez écrit :
> > Can't call method "fetch_element" on an undefined value at
> > /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/Backend/Debian/Dpkg/Copyright.pm line 121.
> >
> > Do you want me to fill a bug repo
Hi all,
I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and found this
patch http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.devel.ipv6/2005-05/msg00012.shtml
Does anybody know the answer of upstream dev to this patch proposition ?
Regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On mercredi 08 avril 2009 04:42:38 Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 18:00:14 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and
> > found this patch
> > http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.d
On samedi 18 avril 2009 00:06:52 Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 19:14:14 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > I'm ready to do it but I think this makes more sense to submit the bug to
> > the upstream dev. Unfortunetely I couldn't find the web pag
Le samedi 14 avril 2012 20:37:14, Svante Signell a écrit :
> On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 20:27 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Svante Signell (14/04/2012):
> > > As the title says, are there plans to use eglibc 2.14 for wheezy??
> > > It has been out for some time now.
> >
> > Again, ask the maintain
a position to do so, and
> > even if we did, the transition now would be many times more disruptive
> > for users than if this had been dealt with in 2010.
> >
> > > If Debian is frozen tomorrow, then Nodejs will not be part of it,
> > > for the very reason that I *did* respect Policy.
> >
> > It may not be part of the release, but it will still be a mess for
> > everyone involved.
>
> Thanks to stpid actions by people not doing their homework, yes.
>
>
> - Jonas
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le mardi 8 mai 2012 07:56:35, Peter Miller a écrit :
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:23 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Conversely, debhelper contains actual,
> > documented, and non-insane interfaces that could be used to do
> > this properly. For some value of "properly" that the ftpmasters
> > would prob
Le samedi 12 mai 2012 04:25:08, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Michael Gilbert writes:
> > So, I think [0] is the most astute message in that thread.
> >
> > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2000/11/msg00251.html
>
> I thought that too when I first read it, but later in the thread are very
>
Le samedi 12 mai 2012 22:56:39, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> "Thomas Preud'homme" writes:
> > Are you referring to [1]? Because the full paragraph is about Program's
> > source code.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2000/11/msg00260
Le lundi 14 mai 2012 01:59:41, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> "Thomas Preud'homme" writes:
> > Back to the redistribution. In the section 4 (Conveying Verbatim
> > Copies), what is discussed is the redistribution of the Program as
> > source code form. Every word
Le lundi 14 mai 2012 11:45:01, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> Le lundi 14 mai 2012 07:57:11, Yann Leboulanger a écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Yann Leboulanger
> >
> > * Package name: python-nbxmpp
> >
> >
Le mercredi 16 mai 2012 09:22:46, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 2012-05-15 21:33, Pierre Jaury wrote:
> > This is an opensource, free and viral project
>
> Viral? I hope this is just a translation artefact; can you explain
> exactly what you mean by it?
From the website linked in th
Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 17:41:55, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a écrit :
> 2012/5/18 Neil Williams :
> > There's a big difference between these bugs and the rest - here there
> > are clear migration paths to later packages which can be used to triage
> > the bug reports in order not to lose report
ink between celt and ckport? I mean, why does this orphaning
message refers (implicitely) to celt?
>
> Ian.
Anyway, I didn't know this package and it seems interesting. I'd be happy to
adopt this package but since I'm quite busy now it wouldn't make any sense to
adopt
Le lundi 2 juillet 2012 18:42:13, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> Hey folks,
>
> As you might have seen from recent discussions about the Fedora and
> Ubuntu strategies for how to deal with EFI and Secure Boot, there are
> potentially major issues in the area. In Debian we don't (yet) have a
> plan, so
Le mardi 10 juillet 2012 13:08:57, Russell Coker a écrit :
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, "Thomas Preud'homme" wrote:
> > When the flaws was exploited, then the attacker had sufficient access to
> > change e.g. EFI and could thus have done whatever nasty things he wanted
>
Le mardi 28 août 2012 18:27:23, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>
> Are all alternate compilers expected to implement gcc extensions? Must
> the code be changed to use appropriate '#ifdef __GNUC__' guards? (And
> what happens the next time gcc adds a new extension...?)
I maintain tcc and it clearly doe
Le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 01:42:01, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>
> So the build process is trying to determine which method will work?
> Then what if it settles on some method that is available on the build
> machine's kernel, but not the target distribution's kernel? I think you
> need to eithe
Le lundi 24 septembre 2012 23:53:01, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > package X would depend on the maintainer field of the packages *already*
> > in Debian, not the one in the package he uploads. Just the way it is at
>
> One way to re
ebman -p apache2.2-common $cmdname
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 07:17:48, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> (…) I agree dlopen()ing shared libraries in general should not
> be supported (I'd even go further and say this should be outright
> banned, given the pain it causes, and optional library support should
> always be implemented by loading a
Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 13:40:13, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
>
> This may be a dumb question, but looking at this example of different
> binNMU changelogs [1], I wonder what is the point of having a log specific
> to each build system ...
>
> In other word, can't we have a binNMU log generated by
Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 15:36:02, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 14:14:20 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Also, it wouldn't help for the case of a binNMU on a subset of all arches
> > since only some of them would have the entry. The solution pro
packages run through dd-list before doing the
> > MBF.
>
> Sorry, I guess I forgot to actually attach the list. Let's try that
> again :)
Thomas Preud'homme
tcc
Thomas Preud'homme
tcc
Fixed upstream already and I cherry-picked the patch for the next uploa
Le lundi 19 août 2013 23:24:48 Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Chow Loong Jin
>
> * Package name: qreator
> Version : 13.05.3
> Upstream Author : David Planella
> * URL : https://launchpad.net/qreator
> * License : GPL-3
Le dimanche 4 mars 2012 22:55:46, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Sergio Cipolla writes:
> > I'm just a Debian user for some years and I'm writing to this list
> > because I found that at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660814 the Debian
> > Multimedia maintainer Fabian Greffrath was
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2012 09:40:12, Christian PERRIER a écrit :
Greetings Christian,
First, let me take advantage of this mail to thank you for your tireless work
on localization.
>
> Nowadays, would someone bet a coin that the same is happening? I would
> not. In my daily job, I see student
Le mardi 30 octobre 2012 16:03:35, Stuart Prescott a écrit :
> > I think four weeks would be much better. A maintainer might
> > reasonably go abroad for 2-3 weeks - we even have a VAC process for
> > handling absences. (And we don't want to complicate this third-party
> > orphan process with ref
Le vendredi 4 janvier 2013 05:44:57, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
> That doesn't seem to match my experience.
>
> I most commonly encounter apt-listbugs bug lists via 'apt-get
> dist-upgrade'. If I say "no" in response to the list of bugs, and then run
> 'apt-get dist-upgrade' again, I see the same l
Le samedi 12 janvier 2013 15:21:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>
> I recommend instead of redefining logic of unstable, branch off new
> suites with new logic.
>
> ...and then back to that issue of "maintainers should concentrate on the
> release" again: I do sincerely worry that additional suite
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Thomas Preud'homme"
* Package name: urwid-satext
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jérôme Poisson
* URL : http://wiki.goffi.org/wiki/Urwid-satext/en
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: Pytho
Le vendredi 5 avril 2013 13:41:50, Adam Borowski a écrit :
>
> It can be done, here's an example how to use a JIT C compiler (tcc)
> this way:
> dget http://angband.pl/debian/pool/main/g/goodbye/goodbye_0.2-1.dsc
> although you might have trouble smuggling this through the FTPmasters :p
>
> On
Le lundi 8 avril 2013 23:35:42, David Prévot a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 08/04/2013 16:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > For general use I believe, however, that html5shiv has proven a better
> > shim. It is part of Modernizr already packaged for Debian.
>
> AFAICT, html5shiv is not in Debian, nor p
Le mardi 9 avril 2013 13:29:09, Wookey a écrit :
>
> I too am a huge aptitude fan. The curses UI is brilliant for working
> out what's up when things are a bit broken. However it doesn't deal
> with multiarch well so I've been stuck with apt-get trying to work out
> fro the tealeaves what's wrong.
Le mercredi 10 avril 2013 21:33:32, Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request assistance with maintaining the iproute2 package.
>
> Help is welcome in all areas, but following ones would be
> extra appreciated:
>
> "Please perform a full source scan and docume
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 14:23:19, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Le 04/05/2011 14:06, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > a nice behaviour, it would be way better to print
> > a warning and fallback to a correct behaviour. Users can then report the
> > problems without experiencing a non working-application.
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 18:22:01, Kevin Smith a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Kevin Smith
>
>
> Package name: swift-im
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Swift Developers
> URL : http://swift.im/
> License : GPL
> Programming
Le jeudi 21 juillet 2011 10:11:37, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> On 11-07-21 at 11:10am, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I now want to include upstream git into a branch, either the upstream
> > branch itself, or some other/new one, but I have no idea how
> > to set that up?
> >
> > Can someone help me
Le samedi 24 septembre 2011 10:05:13, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel"
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> * Package name: mmtk
> Version : 2.7.5
> Upstream Author : Konrad Hinsen
> * URL : http://dirac.cn
Le samedi 24 septembre 2011 12:55:27, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> Le samedi 24 septembre 2011 10:05:13, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel a écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel"
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
>
Le dimanche 19 avril 2015, 12:25:28 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 10.25:11 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work,
> > Raphaël!
>
> Indeed, thank you buxy!
>
> OdyX
+1. Thanks a lot Raphaël.
Cheers,
Thomas
sig
48 matches
Mail list logo
