Subject: ITP: cpuset -- A tool to manage Linux cpusets
Package: wnpp
Owner: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cpuset
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Alex Tsariounov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
Hello,
I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary
packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages
file do not have a Source field. My guess was to use the package name as
the source package name. Is this right?
Thanks,
Thadeu Cascardo.
signature.as
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary
> > packages by their source package. However, some packages in the P
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:20:27PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Why do you need #497205? Is it too slow to just use SourcePkg() in
> the package records object?
>
> Daniel
Sorry! I was lazy/stupid/whatever enough to not read more about apt and
learn how to do it without adding a field to t
l | dialog, less
Suggests: popularity-contest, xdg-utils, zenity
Conflicts: debget
Replaces: debget
diff --git a/dhomepage b/dhomepage
new file mode 100755
index 000..9b6e587
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dhomepage
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2008 Thadeu Lima de Souza
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:30:38PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
> I guess it's really hard to explain because there is a massive gap; I
> can't teach you to be an electrical engineer or logician here :) I
You are assuming there is gap when there may be not.
> think if you had the time to go through an
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:51:55PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
> *without* access to any specific extra data, vendor-specific programs,
> or other non-free software.
I agree here, although, I wouldn't say the DFSG requires that source
code should be modifiable with software distributed in Debi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:01:45PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
[...]
> some cases, the binary blobs *is* the source code; I've spent more than
> enough time programming 8-bit directly from a machine-code monitor).
And many people write non-modular programs; use non-usual constructs; do
not comme
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-10-28 02:45:31, schrieb Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo:
> > If it's not clear by now, people are not arguing that hardware should
> > not be used if it is not free hardware (either it is feasible or not
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-10-28 09:33:07, schrieb Tristan Seligmann:
> > Again, assuming I'm not misspeaking, that form of the work is already
> > what we have.
>
> ACK ;-)
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
> Michelle Konzack
In whi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:58:12PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-10-27 17:01:50, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> > Jeff Carr wrote:
> >
> > > But the opencore case is the easy case, hybrid chips don't even have
> > > source. The firmware blob is often generated when you fabricate the
> > > ch
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
> "delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He wanted to
> note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
> rele
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 09:25:18AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> So the only option for "Ben" ist, to send the corrected source back to
> the manufacturer and ask him to test and relicense it...
>
> The problem is, that certifying cost up to 40.000 Euro and re-certifying
> arround 10-15.000 E
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
* Package name: libstrophe
Version : 0.7.x
Upstream Author : StanzIQ
* URL : http://code.stanziq.com/strophe/wiki
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library for
Hello, Daniel.
I've submitted bug 497206 for aptitude with a patch attached almost two
years ago. It's a new feature, to allow packages to be grouped by
source. It's usually easier to upgrade all packages from the same
source, without having to look for (and sometimes guess) what are the
other pa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
* Package name: drupal6-trans-pt-br
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Portuguese, Brazil translation team
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/pt-br
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: po
Hello,
Some software I intend to package work with the new cgroup feature in
Linux. I would like to open a discussion about what would be the better
place to mount it and how/when to mount it.
Some of the options are:
/sys/cgroup
/proc/cgroup
These two would not be very wise, since some kernel
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:52:46PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:00 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Some software I intend to package
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:54:58PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>
>> Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In
>> Documentation/cgroups/*, we have:
>
>> So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /conta
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers,
> > &g
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:24:16AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > From what I've seen, most of them are in the same phases as Debian, or,
> > perhaps, behind. Fedora seems to plan that for
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:53:53AM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I havent received any response about my ITA message for Jabberd2 (see
> below).
> It seems the current maintainer is MIA.
> Is it possible someone of the pkg-xmpp-devel group can reply?
>
> I would like to adopt it, b
Let me add here some of the history about rnetclient and IRPF Livre,
concerning legal and government matters.
As already said, Oliva has been publishing IRPF Livre for a while. He
decompiled that software when it was using GPL libraries, which would
make it GPL software, even though SERPRO or Rece
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:30:46AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:15 AM Sean Whitton wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 23 Oct 2018 at 05:06PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > >
> > > In short: Make it very clear if you want to provide long-term support
> > > for your project. Talk to the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:05:18AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-10-26 10:26:09, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > I am guessing one of the other (incorrect) assumption users might make
> > is that the "LTS version" is preferred over other versions. Tha
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:29:29AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 02 May 2018 11:23:56 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > Instead, I very much would prefer a patch to puiparts so that it could
> > use sbuild's schroot system instead of tarballs.
>
> piuparts has support for using chroots
On September 13, 2015 9:33:52 PM GMT-03:00, Sergio Durigan Junior
wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote:
>
>> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>
> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide
> patc
27 matches
Mail list logo
