Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: thunk-gen
Version : 0.0~git20240607.f9cae90
Upstream Author : Stas Sergeev
* URL : https://github.com/stsp/thunk_gen
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: djstub
Version : 0.0~git20240621.49e7ba6-1
Upstream Author : Stas Sergeev
* URL : https://github.com/stsp/djstub
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 10:50:44 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli
wrote:
> In data venerdì 19 luglio 2024 13:14:11 CEST, Mathias Gibbens ha scritto:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Mathias Gibbens
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > * Packag
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:48 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
> fuse (2.x) is long obsolete, yet we still have a long tail of packages
> (Build-)Depending on it. Given fuse and fuse3 are not coinstallable,
> IMO we should get packages off fuse.
>
> Below is my proposed MBF wording, and a dd-
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will allow the
package to migrate even
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:24:23 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
> Stephen,
> and everyone else who pointed out that coinstallability is a
> non-issue - thanks!
You’re welcome!
> About the additional work in fuse/fuse3, #918984 and #927291, I
> wonder if they are relevant to the libfuse consumers.
On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:24:40 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> I'm planning to re-introduce bcachefs-tools in Debian after it was
> recently RMed by Jonathan: O: #1078599, RM: #1079375.
You don’t need to re-introduce it, Jonathan took care to ensure that the
package wouldn’t be fully removed, as expl
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:00:32 +0100, Jan Niehusmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point. But that problem can be solved by some program checking that
> all installed packages are actually available from the selected
> distribution(s).
>
> That could be integrated into apt (e.g. apt-get upgrade w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: dasm
Version : 2.20.11
Upstream Author : Peter H. Froehlich
* URL : http://dasm-dillon.sf.net
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : macro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: boing26
Version : 5
Upstream Author : Rob Kudla
* URL : http://www.kudla.org/raindog/games/
* License : Public domain
Programming Lang: Assembler
Description : Boing! Amiga demo
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:14:08PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 7. Juni 2010, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > * License : Public domain
> > Description : Boing! Amiga demo port for the Atari VCS 2600
> >
> > Boing! is a small demo based on the
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:39:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 7. Juni 2010, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I wanted to package it so that stella could move to main - admittedly
> > on somewhat of a technicality...
>
> /me is speechless, roles eyes and
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:13:15 +0100, David Goodenough
wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Then, in the usual Debian parlance, "nonfree" usually suggests
> > proprietary gratis distributable things. Winetricks includes a mix of
> > distributable, non-distributable and eve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: binutils-mingw-w64
Version : 2.20.1
Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation, Inc.
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
* License : GPL 3, GFDL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: gcc-mingw-w64
Version : 4.5.1
Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation, Inc.
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/
* License : GPL 3, GFDL
Programming Lang: C
Description : The
crosscompile toolchain too?
>
> In principle, yes. In practice right now, no. Stephen Kitt has looked
> into this and gave a comprehensive talk at this year's mini-debconf
> (But I can't find a URL as I'm not sure that Sylvestre has actually
> uploaded them anywhere). I t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: libz-mingw-w64
Version : 1.2.8
Upstream Author : Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler
* URL : http://www.gzip.org/zlib/
* License : zlib
Programming Lang: C
Description : compression
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: lgogdownloader
Version : 2.17
Upstream Author : Sude-
* URL : https://sites.google.com/site/gogdownloader/
* License : WTFPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : downloader for
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > You mean, besides completely hijacking the package?
> >
> > The last maintainer upload is dated 2010/05/23.
> >
> > So, from my POV, you (Michael) and Hilko Beng
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:40:59 -0400, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> We've been getting a few bug reports from users attempting to install
> multiarch wine who have yet to manually enable multiarch itself.
> Obviously that is a failure on their part, and is easily correctable.
> However, I wonde
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:47:48 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Svante Signell [2012-06-28 11:43 +0200]:
> > The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
> > Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
> > Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combination
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:48:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:50:39PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> > tcltrf (source)
> > * win/msvcrt.dll
> >
> > This is part of Windows. I don't expect Debian has been granted
> > permission to distribute it. :)
>
> It's the run-time lib
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: pthreads-win32
Version : 2.9.1+dfsg
Upstream Author : Ross Johnson
* URL : http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description : POSIX
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:27:02 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 2) Each source and binary package (+ core parts) is considered a legal
> entity of its own. That's why we can refer to licensing texts existing
> in common-licenses, but for e.g. Apache license cannot refer to the text
> shipped wit
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:43:32 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 03:37 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > the Built-Using will documented in the next release of the Policy, thanks
> > to the input of the FTP team.
> >
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dbnpolicy/policy.git;a=c
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:06:57 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> And an interesting tidbit:
>checking for suffix of executables... .exe
>checking whether we are cross-compiling... no
>
> So the concept of "cross-compiling" is pretty fuzzy :)
That typically happens if you have wine and binfmt-s
On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:39:28 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:57:58AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The big issue which crops up then isn't so much the directory structure's
> > impact on the build process, but rather its impact on the pack
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:59:24AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Thanks for your work, but isn't it time we quietly got rid of this
> library? Video memory and mode setting should be managed by the kernel,
> not by applications. It's bad enough that we had the X server doing
> this for years
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:43:05 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 11:00 AM, Wookey wrote:
> > OK. And is 32-bit wine (to be installed on amd64) an amd64 binary
> > that understands i386 code or is it actually i386 code? If the latter
> > to what degree are wine32:amd64 and wine32:i386 any di
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:37:59 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-13 19:26 +0200]:
> > Yes, but that's not the problem. Take the premise that the target
> > directory structure is as described above, so most library development
> > packages ship as many h
On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > > Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > >> [...] as long
> > >> as there is a way to build-depend on the build-d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: libevdev
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/libevdev/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : wrapper library
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:58:36 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-09-28 22:18 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > since a short time when I build a binary package on my running system,
> > I cannot install the created .deb anymore because it depends on
> > libc-amd64 (>= some.version) which somehow
Hi Bret,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:41:43 +0200, Bret Curtis wrote:
> * Package name: OpenMW
> Version : 0.26.0
> Upstream Author : Marc Zinnschlag
> * URL : http://www.openmw.org/
> * License : GPLv3
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : Reimplementatio
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:22:12 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Would you be interested in packaging this within the Games Team?
>
> Also, it would be great if game-data-packager could be enhanced to build a
> package for the data files (and we can help you with that).
Never mind, I see
Hi Fabian (and all the other participants in this thread),
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:33:14 +0100, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> Is there a principle behind all this or where can I help to clean this
> up? ;)
The history has been explained by others. I've been working for a while on
dropping at least g
1 at 08:16:01PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > As far as the naming is concerned, see #622276 for details. I've thought
> > about splitting the packages up, with separate 32- and 64-bit targets, but
> > I'm not sure whether replacing and providing the mingw32 packages woul
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:03:16 +1030, Ron wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:43AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > There is one major difference I know of: i686-pc-mingw32 (the official
> > MinGW triplet) builds with Dwarf2 exception handling, whereas the
> > -w64-mingw32 (t
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:31:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 13:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:48:08PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Would it be worth adding a lintian check for instructions that may not
> > > be supported (bearing in mind th
Hi Fabian,
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:33:55 +0100, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > The history has been explained by others. I've been working for a while on
> > dropping at least gcc-mingw32; see #644769 which tracks the various
> > packages build-depending on gcc-mingw32 and/or mingw32. There are only
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:17:32 +0100, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > 32-bit packages (lots of people don't realise mingw-w64 targets 32-bit
> > Windows too; it seems the package description isn't sufficient).
>
> Yes, the package descriptions might need some improvement. This is how
> mingw-w64 intro
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:03:32 +0100, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > probably generate more confusion with the similarity to mingw32. I'd vote
> > for mingw-w64-i686 and mingw-w64-x86_64 in the end, based on the
> > following:
>
> Me too!
I'll go for that then, taking into account Simon's remark (so
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:34:00 +0100, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > To provide all the binaries in gcc-mingw32 it will have to depend on
> > {gcc,g++,gfortran}-mingw-w64-i686; its only contents will be the
> > compatibility symlinks you mention (and the usual /usr/share/doc
> > contents). It will pull
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:17:54 +, Wookey wrote:
> I know almost nothing about mingw* use and variants, but it does strike
> me that it just another cross-compiler, and choices about package
> names and triplets should be at least influenced by what we do for all
> the other cross-toolchains, mul
Hi Philip,
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:18:32 +, Philip Ashmore
wrote:
> I've got several projects in SourceForge, one of which is v3c-dcom
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c-dcom/
>
> I'm quickly coming to the realisation that I would need several
> headers/tools from Wine
>
> htt
Hi,
Neither my AM (Christian Perrier) nor myself are sure about the answer to this
one, so he suggested I ask -devel for advice (and I'm throwing -mentors into
the mix too).
I've prepared an update for calibre, to fix a few issues in the package which
is currently in Wheezy (see #686547 for detai
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:16:26 +0100, Christian PERRIER
wrote:
> Quoting Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org):
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Quoting Jakub Wilk (jw...@debian.org):
> > > > I would paint the bikeshed the following color:
> > > > 0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1
> > >
> > >
Hi Wookey,
On Tue, 7 May 2013 03:04:50 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> (just a decision to leave arch-independent headers in /usr/include and
> move arch-dependent headers to /usr/include/triplet).
Doesn't this limit us to cross-compiling only across Debian architectures? If
we go for a full /usr/include
Hi,
On Mon, 06 May 2013 14:49:57 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
> for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
> some were already discussed very recently):
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Remov
On Wed, 8 May 2013 03:57:20 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Wookey [2013-05-07 22:31 +0100]:
>
> [right. 3rd attempt at getting this email to make sense. reposting the
> whole thing this time, hopefully with no remaining howlers]
>
> +++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-07 14:38 +02
On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
> > for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
> > some were
Hi Dimitri,
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:22:09 +, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> But GPL text does confuse me as a whole, no modifications nor derivate
> works of the GPL license text are allowed, and the original text has
> "and later" clause - is licensing without "and later" constitues
> modificati
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:20:28 +, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Dimitri John Ledkov [2014-02-04 13:30 +]:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700177
>
> Do I understand this correctly - that it prevents a package
> cross-binutils-0.1 to generate binaries called
> binutils-arm-linux-g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: rr
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Mozilla Foundation
* URL : http://rr-project.org
* License : BSD and MIT/X
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : application execution recorder
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:01:58 -0700, Manoj Srivastava
wrote:
> Stephen Kitt
>mingw-w64
This one is due to missing B-D-I...
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:08:07 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:33:25PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > we're changing the directory where binary Perl modules are installed
> > > from the traditional /usr/lib/perl5 to e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: evtest
Version : 1.27
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/evtest/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : utility to monitor input
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:14:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:13 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
> > * Package name: evtest
> > Version : 1.27
> > Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
> > * URL : http://cgit.freedes
Hello,
Now that multiarch is here, I've been wondering whether and how it applies to
cross-compiler libraries for non-Debian architectures, for example Microsoft
Windows (I'm the new maintainer of mingw-w64). As I understand it, multiarch
wasn't intended for non-Debian architectures, and this is (
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:53:39 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> This package is just one single shell script. But an important one. The
> rescan-scsi-bus.sh script helps a lot in the SAN space where there could
> be targets with sporadic connecitons. Is it okay to package a single
> shell s
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:51:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > I would rather add a new architecture to dpkg for this. This does not
> > mean that debian has to create a new port or that the packages have to
> > stop being arch:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:59:38 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Stephen Kitt]
> > This is already packaged in scsitools!
>
> Huh, I occasionally wondered whatever happened to 'scsiadd'.
> Guess its functionality was subsumed into scsitools.
Effectively, yes, alt
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:38:57 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:05:33AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > IIUC then the GNU triplet includes the choice of C library because
> > binaries (e.g., libraries) compiled against mingw32 and mingw-w64
> > cannot be linked (i.e., they
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:44:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04:59PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Unfortunately this appears to go against policy 9.1.1, which forbids
> > packages installing files into triplet-based directories under /usr/lib
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:44:39 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> Stephen Kitt writes:
> > So if I understand things correctly that would mean using /usr/lib/win32
> > and /usr/lib/win64, regardless of the binutils/gcc triplet (which is fine
> > as
>
> If that is wha
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:46:40 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Stephen Kitt [2011-04-24 19:14 +0200]:
> > > So I would be opposed to making such a change in policy for the time
> > > being; I think cross-compilers should stick with the traditional
> > > cross-compiler dire
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:46:10 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:46 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> [...]
> > I do think that getting the 'win32' arch name and triplet defined in
> > dpkg-architecture is stage 1 for you. I thought we'd already done that
> > years ago, when this last came
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: gdb-mingw-w64
Version : 7.2
Upstream Author : Free Software Foundation, Inc.
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, C++, Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: gcab
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Marc-André Lureau
* URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/msitools
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Microsoft Cabinet file
Dear fellow developers,
Sorry for the cross-post, I'm not sure what the most appropriate list for
this is.
Recently debhelper was changed to ensure that packages which link to another
package's documentation directory (/usr/share/doc/${package}) have a strictly
versioned dependency on the latter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: fcml
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Slawomir Wojtasiak
* URL : http://fcml-lib.com
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description : machine code manipulation library
FCML
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-argparse
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Vitaly Puzrin
* URL : https://github.com/nodeca/argparse
* License : Expat
Programming Lang
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:12:57 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:57:06PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using the following hook:
> >
> > % cat /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D10-man-db
> > #!/bin/sh
> > # Don't rebuild man-db
> >
> >
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:30:40 +0200, Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> On 2015-08-22 19:19, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I therefore believe that we should try to work to ensure arch:all
> > > packages can be built on all major architectures.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: osslsigncode
Version : 1.7.1
Upstream Author : Per Allansson
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/osslsigncode
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Authenticode
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: shockolate
Version : 0.7.5
Upstream Author : Chad Cuddigan
* URL : https://github.com/Interrupt/systemshock
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : System Shock
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: nulib2
Version : 3.1.0
Upstream Author : Andy McFadden
* URL : http://nulib.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : NuFX and Binary II archive utility
NuLib2 is a
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:13:28 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk:
> > For i386 the last newly released 32bit-only hardware were some early
> > Intel Atoms 10 years ago, and when the AMD Geode goes out of production
> > soon there might be no hardware in production left.
> > There are stil
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:33:21 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-07-28 16:03:43)
> > On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but:
> > >
> > > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these
> > >
Hi josch,
On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 20:11:07 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Kitt (2019-08-06 18:43:24)
> > Could we avoid (some of) this by treating “source” as a new architecture?
> > There would be a mostly do-nothing buildd which would repack the source
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: binutils-djgpp
Version : 2.32
Upstream Author : GNU
* URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : cross-binutils for DOS using DJGPP
On Sat, 20 May 2023 18:14:52 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > How easily could we add 64-bit system detection to the i386 installer,
> > and a message saying something like:
> >
> > "You're installing the i386 architecture on a 64-bi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pycrc
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Pircher
* URL : https://pycrc.org
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:24:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> SDL 1.2 was superseded by SDL 2 several years ago, and no longer receives
> upstream maintenance or releases. Maintained software that uses SDL 1.2
> should be ported to SDL 2.
Given the time scales involved, is it worth waiti
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:33:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 08:50:30 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:24:03 +0100, Simon McVittie
> > wrote:
> > > SDL 1.2 was superseded by SDL 2 several years ago, and no longer
> > >
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:10 +0300, Ramūnas Keliuotis
wrote:
> Was not sure if I'm doing this the right way. Forgive me for creating
> troubles.
dh-make-golang is the appropriate tool. Don’t worry about API instability,
it’s well understood in the Go world that v0 releases don’t provide API
Hi Ramūnas,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:02:38 +0200, Ramūnas Keliuotis
wrote:
[…]
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 9:06 PM Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:01:10 +0300, Ramūnas Keliuotis
> > wrote:
[…]
> > > I was following the `dh-make-golang` example. I am not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libiir
Version : 1.9.4
Upstream Author : Bernd Porr
* URL : https://github.com/berndporr/iir1
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: smallerc
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Alexey Frunze
* URL : https://github.com/alexfru/SmallerC
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: lfanew
Version : 0~20230825
Upstream Author : TK Chia
* URL : https://codeberg.org/tkchia/lfanew
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: C
On Tue, 28 May 2024 11:00:34 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:26 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 08:14:20PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > 2. Keep the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames lintian warning (for now)
> > > ?
> >
> > What packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: etherdfs-server
Version : 0~20180203
Upstream Author : Mateusz Viste
* URL : http://etherdfs.sf.net/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Ethernet DOS File System server
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: ethflop
Version : 20191003
Upstream Author : Mateusz Viste
* URL : http://ethflop.sourceforge.net
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C, x86 assembly
Description : Ethernet DOS floppy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: loggedfs
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Rémi Flament
* URL : http://rflament.github.io/loggedfs/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Logging file system
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: key-mapper
Version : 0.8.1-1
Upstream Author : sezanzeb
* URL : https://github.com/sezanzeb/key-mapper
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Input device button
Hi Fabian,
Le 23/08/2021 10:53, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
in the short term, I'd like to replace the prboom-plus Doom engine in
Debian with its more actively developed fork dsda-doom. While
developement of the former has mostly stagnated (granted, it had its
2.6.1um release earlier this month),
Hi Zebediah,
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:17:53 -0500, Zebediah Figura
wrote:
> I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
> libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
Hi Bastien,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 08:53:49 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> Le dim. 5 sept. 2021 à 03:34, Zebediah Figura a
> écrit :
> > I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> > Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
> > libfreet
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 12:14:47 -0500, Zebediah Figura
wrote:
> On 9/5/21 11:19 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:17:53 -0500, Zebediah Figura
> > wrote:
> >> I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> >> Wine
On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 10:38:52 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 08:53:49AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >...
> > Improve dpkg to support partial arch. I volonteer to implement none arch
> > but i am waiting from guillem here.
> >...
>
> There is also plenty of infrastruct
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
