Hi there ...
I've got a little problem ;)
In my debian package there usualy are 4 debs (3 flavours + common) been built.
I've created the rules to be to choose between a minimum of 2
(standard-flavour + common) and the maximum of 4 packages.
If a user wants to compile the package on his own (m
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
> Hi there ...
>
> I've got a little problem ;)
Sorry .. will never user reply for a new message anymore ;)
Lg
Roman
Hi there ...
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making it
available to users for testing puposes. I know that the initial release
should be 1.0.8-1. So if I do
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
> > version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
>
> If you use that number, the upst
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> [Roman Müllenschläder]
>
> > > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
> > > one in stable?
> >
> > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running E
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> On 3/13/07, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > > > If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
> > >
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
> > Edgy ;)
>
> [...]
>
> If you're developing packages f
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so
> > if testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with
> > just ignoring the warni
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
What's wrong with my headers?
Lg
Roman
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
> > > > > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor
> > > > > the one in stable?
> > > >
> > >
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
> Hi there ...
>
> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
> number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
>
> Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making
> it avai
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now
Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
> >
Hi there ...
The different frontends (apt, dpkg, aptitude, ...) behave different in
consideration of installing 'recommends'.
The decision which packages should be 'suggested' and which should
be 'recommended' depends on what frontend is supposed as 'standard'.
What is beeing considered as 'st
14 matches
Mail list logo
