already generate audio and video that convincingly imitate real
people. Why not the same with email? Though, the implications are rather
serious.
Perhaps our policies need to evolve to expect (or require?)
cryptographic signatures from DDs in mailing list discussion. We may
eventually reach a poin
olved checking for current/previous WNPP bugs about them and then
checking for packages already in Debian with similar names. Let's just
say that I am still in the "getting started" phase with Ruby.
However, I will contact them before I do anything else. Thanks for the
info.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ssuming
the package has a watch file, you can just use uscan with the
--force-download switch.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s it
> is indeed implemented and retrieve the .orig.tar.gz.
>
According to Debian Policy [0], the get-orig-source is optional.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
h
/debhelper/debhelper_6.0.5/changelog#versionversion6.0.0
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:49:19PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11286 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > In any event, perhaps the advice you provide in your other mail in
> > this thread should be included in the Debian developer reference.
>
> Want to writ
e I am investigating and hope to have an upload ready soon.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y of the source code (1 to 5)
> 3. Your other comments
I do not have time to review the code right now. However, the abuse of
XML that you call a configuration file really needs to be fixed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ted version
control systems (and even some of the newer ones that follow a more
traditional model). Now, not everyone likes CVS or Subversion, but most
everyone is conversant enough with them that the tools don't present an
added barrier to entry.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sá
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:19:50PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008-02-22 08:33:17 -0500 :
>
> [...]
>
> > Now, if I could run an 'apt-get source -t unstable foo' and create
> > my patch against the resulting source package, and be sure that
really is not all that different from very-northern
Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia :-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:21:19PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:04PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>> So he's really in very-no
the pkg-nx group on
Alioth.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ending an epoch be less drastic? Doesn't sound like the
> mistake was upstream's...
In the Debian Perl Group, the practice has been to append +pristine to
the upstream version number.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.conne
#x27; along.
> Also, what you would do is dpkg-divert /bin/rm, and then
> call /bin/rm.coreutils or whatever.
>
This is only reasonable if it won't break things like 'make uninstall'
or other scripts that expect that rm will be well behaved and do what it
is told.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
necessary changes.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sánchez]
>
> > Alternatively, since Debian is an all-volunteer project you can feel
> > free to volunteer to contribute the necessary changes.
>
> We definitely need more hands to
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35:51AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Wed March 26 2008 05:51:32 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:32:33PM +0530, Unni wrote:
> > > Why the debian can be more interesting? More graphics, more drivers etc.
> > > I think thi
along sudo.
>
> Note that I am about to upload the package to debian mentors
> and start looking for a sponsor.
>
If it us "just a ruby script", is it sensible to use an entire package
for it? What about trying to get it included in another package that
ha
x27;s the difference to Devel::DProf, bundled with the Perl core?
> The fact that the output file is human-readable?
>
That and that it works with XS modules, which DProf does not.
Incidentally, Joey Hess already packaged this and it is in NEW, so I
have closed the ITP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ftware based on libbar, it is
> not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required.
>
Except that a -dev package can be perfectly functional without
pkg-config. So, in that case it should not be a dependency, but a
recommends.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://peopl
and not just modules. That
is just one example. Personally, I am ambivalent on the matter.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
vanish
> now it is stored somewhere ...
>
This is something that I propsed on January 3, 2007, on debian-devel.
There was a fairly lengthy thread that resulted and Thomas Viehmann even
offered to help. Of course, he and I both became very busy and so it
sort of fell by the wayside. H
s to update the sha
> checks as well. The latest devscripts does.
>
Will the devscripts in stable be updated to handle this? If so, when?
If not, why not?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:48:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote, Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:24 AM
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> >>do you have updated devscripts? debsign signs the dsc then updates th
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 02:25:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> >> IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few
> >> packa
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:27:35PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez [Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:04:39 -0400]:
>
> > IMO, that sort of misses the point. While I maintain quite a few
> > packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in one V
y. It is just a suggestion. I am living
with the situation for now, because I still need to work on my packages
and my groups' packages and upload them. However, I think that the
whole thing was gone about in a rather uncoordinated fashion. To me,
that is what looks bad.
Regards,
-Roberto
-
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:06:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > This certainly good. However, perhaps dak should have been changed to
> > accept both format versions (1.7 and 1.8), instead of just rejecti
like language libraries, especially
when they originate from some sort of common language repository like
CPAN or CRAN or whatever if OCaml has something similar, it is probably
good to have some sort of common naming scheme.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~r
27;s orig.tar.gz, untar it and then apply the Ra
> sources to it? Or is that too fragile?
>
I believe that the package build should be able to succeed even in the
absence of a network connection.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ept the files named
/etc/init.d/shorewall and /etc/default/shorewall.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
list but do not want to
subscribe, the list archives are always available:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
B requirement of the regular installer) that would be imposed to
be able to do that.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
XML by hand is even a remotely sane thing
to do.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pository keyrings? Will those be allowed or disallowed?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>
> electricsheep[1] deserves a prioritary adoption: a major upstream
> version has been released and Debian's is now deprecated.
>
I'd like to adopt electricsheep.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
R
there some magic I can put into a prerm/postrm script that will
handle that?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rk or is appropriate for this package.
Any advice/insights on this would be appreciated.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/547607
[1] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer
plicated, the first upload of the new
> packages would be to experimental...
>
This I do not know about.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mean that I am permitted to override the lintian error?
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:43:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> Does that mean that I am permitted to override the lintian error?
>
Please disregard. It turns out that the proposed fix causes a FTBFS on
amd64, which is not acceptable. Overriding the lintian error will
clearly
n browsers would not be kept out.
>
What is the point?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g bug triage in there
would be a good thing.
> People should be given assistance and encouragement in
> doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
> little time (sick family members).
>
I like doing bug triage as well. I guess it is because I am a neat
f
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:12:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > People should be given assistance and encouragement in
> > > doing it. I actually like doing it, but I
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:47:38AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
> > the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
> >
t happens in the case (that was already pointed out) where a
bug languishes without attention for a year or more, someone NMUs to fix
the bug and the mainainer immediately uploads to revert the NMU? It
seems that there needs to be some way to handle situations like that.
Regards,
-Roberto
been reported to work on mutt, and it failed here with kmail.
> Is the crypt+sign mail format standard ?
>
The last vote (on the package upload rules) worked for me sending
encrypted from mutt.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.c
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; > >just a willingness to help should the current maintainer be unable to
> > >continue for some reason.
>
> an "understudy" or "standby" ?
>
Could we call it "co-maintainer" or something like that?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
way to optimize it?
>
Interesting. I have ~1600 packages installed on my development machine
and I do not experience the slowness you talk about. It was installed
about 3.5 years ago.
How much RAM/CPU does the machine have? How fast are the disks?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
> > &g
mecases those are transparent to
> the end users)
>
I think that is the principal problem. I use apt-proxy and have about a
dozen machines (counting virtual machines) that all hit that one
apt-proxy.
I am not sure how best to solve that problem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
htt
r even slower ISDN link) with an
opteron, xeon, athlon64 or the like. I'm not saying that your situation
is not possible, simply that trading size for compression/decompression
time would benefit far more people than it would "hurt."
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánche
kes sense.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:09:50PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:12:33AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 21:15 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> > >
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:24:53AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > man procmailrc
>
> On gmail?
>
gmail does support POP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http:
d via SSL.
However, this causes other really annoying problems:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/2007-April/001140.html
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ct?
> "good or bad" depends on your goals for the configuration.
>
My goal is that it is secure.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the
> LDAP server decide if the password is correct or not.
>
You mean that the passwords go in the clear?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:39:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:19:34PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:49:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > It means that pam_unix is able to access your shadow hash on beh
the password. It is passing the
> > > password over to the LDAP server (using an LDAP bind), and letting the
> > > LDAP server decide if the password is correct or not.
>
> [Roberto C. Sánchez]
> > You mean that the passwords go in the clear?
>
> Yes, unless you are
nobody forces you.
>
What if you are a one-time sponsor for a dozen packages? It seems like
Nico's original gripe is valid.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gt;
> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
>
> So the simple(r) option is "subscribe to pts".
>
Doesn't the key used to sign the upload tell you?
Regards,
-Robe
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> >> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
> &g
d then requires a security update, it would not be buildable
in stable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ile the RT bug. However, I have experienced this problem.
What can I do to help?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ething like (>= 1.0.1-1) and (<<
1.0.1-2) be more correct? That way the package is still binNMU safe and
also safe from breaking if incompatibilities are introduced in the next
source upload?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:56:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Your case is probably better handled with a simple higher-or-equal
> > > dependency.
> >
> > Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:49:07PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (>= 1.0.1-1) and
that the testing/unstable version will also
increase when the new package is introduced to fix the problem there as
well.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the
> > empty string. If a package is the target of a security upload in
> > stable, you can be certain t
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:54:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >>
> >> > Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluat
case, it is becoming apparent that the continued OT discussions
are becoming increasingly unpopular.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rsing
> programmatically.
>
Something like /^Justify-\([^:]+\):/ should do it, right? Then $1
becomes the package name.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
vating
> event. For example, file triggers do not inform the package of the
> filename. In the future this might be added as an additional feature,
> but there are some problems with this.
>
I'd be interested to know in what problems there are with this.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
that the release team is already covered well on release.debian.org, via
> regular mails to d-d-a and in the developers reference.
>
I think that having a centrally located list of teams within Debian and
where someone can go to learn more/get involved is a good thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
opment. Of course, since the security team can't possibly monitor
upstream development for every package (even just those which don't have
active maintainers), we can't really know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d by the maintainer of the package. Especially in the case of mass
filings resulting from things like rebuilding the archive or other
cases (like the bug reporter not knowing/being able to access the stuff
in NEW), I think there should be a bit of leniency.
Regards,
-Roberto
-
GtkOL.
>
> What about author and url? :)
>
Also, a more descriptive short description.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s.so file in libgnomevfs2-extra's postinst (and
> the same for other packages providing GnomeVFS methods), so that its
> timestamp changes.
>
This might be a really impetus and test case for the new dpkg triggers
that have been proposed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C.
; mail the sysadmin when a new kernel is installed. Because reboot cannot
> be automated ... or let the sysadmin install only the kernel manually
> (or have an option do that) but inform the sysadmin mail command is our
> friend) for the existence of new kernel..
How is what you describe diff
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
>
> That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :
ected by the ftp-masters as too generic. Arnaud renamed it to
mozilla-noscript and that was accepted.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
server-class disks.
>
That may be true when it comes to breakdowns. However, I challenge you
to show me a "cheap" desktop disk that is also SCSI or SAS *and*
hotpluggable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
kilo to mean exactly 1000 in the context
of computing was a marketing gimmick.
Besides, there are other units of measure which carry the same name and
have different numerical values based on context (think statute miles
and nautical miles), though I don't think any such examples can be fo
lowing rigorous standards.
>
It has never been anything more than people defaulting to a close
approximation. Language is imperfect. People make do.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 12 juin 2007 à 03:29 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > > It has never been anything but a gross imprecision introduced by people
> > > incapable of following rigorous standards.
> > >
l these weird and whacky new Perl module packages in aid of
> something, ie are they about to become reverse dependencies of some new
> package?
>
Do they have to be? I know that I would personally prefer to apt-get
install some Perl module, rather than install it myself from CPAN or
some
ion installed.
>
> It looks like rpmstrap could build you a suitable chroot (like
> debootstap for Debian), but from the description it appears to be
> somewhat outdated (eg Fedora Core 2).
>
Also, based on my experience trying to build a CentOS 3 chroot (CentOS 3
being fairly
ultiple
Linux distros (or even with other operating systems, now that Solaris
ships with GNOME).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t for Xen in a stable release is not suitable, I
would have to consider migrating those servers to some other distro. I
would really hate to have to do that.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:01:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:05:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > I think the first question to resolve is to establish that it *is*
> > > supported...
>
> > I think that the prudent thing for
/srv (or all of it). Such is not
the case for /var. That is, people know better than NFS mount /var.
That guarantee does not exist, since by nature /srv should mountable by
NFS (e.g., for a web cluster, or something like that).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.co
ready working on something like that.
>
> This time we will really do it. :)
>
I know I have really wanted to get started on this, but keep lacking the
time. I feel like we can probably get something substantial started
this time. Perhaps a meeting on IRC would be a good idea. Maybe on a
s,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/314571
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
einst had actually been reached, it
> would've caused the package to fail to unpack.
>
In case you missed my other mail in this thread, I think this is the
same issue I reported in #314571.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www
>
> | plz test my pkgs so I can has leverage against the release
> team, kthxbye
>
I don't get it. Isn't the amount of testing received one of the points
the release team considers when deciding whether or not grant an
exception? If it were not, I would be quite surpri
the failure). It would have eventually manifested
itself on the main architectures when they switched. As it was, I was
able to get upstream to fix the package will ahead of the switch in
Debian.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing),
> and waiting a month for each of them, well, is quite a drag.
>
You can upload to NEW packages that Build-Depend on one another. I have
done it without issue.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
De
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
