> Thursday, September 16, 1999, 10:50:57 AM, Raul wrote:
> > Um.. you're just not lazy enough...
> > # cd /usr/local/bin
> > # ln -s /usr/bin/perl
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 11:42:21AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> ln -s `which perl` /usr/local/bin/perl
You're confusing keystroke time with character c
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 04:34:44AM +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
> compiler error:
> vrweb-1.5/src/common/Dispatch/fdmask.C:99: `fds_bits' undeclared (first
> use this function)
>
> problem code:
> if (fds_bits[i]) {
>
> declaration in sys/types.h:
> /usr/include/bits/types.h: __fd_mask fds_
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:23:36AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> show to people. If you would like to try out debconf, simply add this line
> to /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http://va.debian.org/~joeyh/ debconf/
>
> There are a few packages in there modified to use debconf. Good examples
>
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:22:59PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> Anyway, which ftpd in unstable do you see as the package to promote as
> the ftpd of choice in Debian?
Depending on what your needs are, perhaps roxen.
--
Raul
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:20:13PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> It's my personal preference that ISO standard be used unless otherwise
> told - but that's me.
I tend to agree. It would just be so simple to have the default be ISO.
As ISO is very unambiguous, I don't think it would cause problems, ei
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
> Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
> stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
> anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.
roxen does.
--
Raul
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 06:49:55PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> I use Roxen exclusively as a httpd where I have a say on the matter,
> but it is mainly a httpd, and lacks configuration features (like
> chrooting some selected users into different roots) I use with
> proftpd, although I have a
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 02:45:32PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > FYI, sash_3.3-5 (which has been sitting in Incoming for the
> > last couple weeks) no longer prompts at postinst time, as the
> > postinst/prerm scripts have been completely redesigned.
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 a
Raul Miller wrote:
> > They don't touch the root account. Instead, they clone
> > it as sashroot and set the shell on the cloned account.
> >
> > This is mentioned in the package description.
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I suppose
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 01:37:43PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Will this affect people who upgrade? It would be very unpleasant to upgrade
> from slink and have a new root user.
Hmmm...
> Even for new installs, I disagree with your decision. sash is useful
> without another root account; howe
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 03:15:47PM -0500, Andrew G . Feinberg wrote:
> B) Offender does not relent and/or makes funny faces at us
> Of course we are horrified by the funny faces, but how do we defend our
> licensing? Perhaps we need a lawyer for this part.
I suggest that we tell them that th
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:46:09PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > Also, if you can anticipate any failure modes where sash would damage
> > the password file I'd appreciate hearing about them. It's already
> > the case that if sash has any probl
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 06:02:47PM -0400, Greg Johnson wrote:
> Here's one (happend to me). I have a '+' at the end of my /etc/passwd file
> for nis. sash tried to add the new root acccount at teh end of /etc/passwd
> AFTER the +. didn't work.
That was sash 3.3-5
Sash 3.3-6 already addresses t
501 - 513 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
