reason to compile a custom kernel image, then the conclusion is clear.
Unless you care about performace. Which is the main reason to use different
packages for each CPU type.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahu
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 12:09:12AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:28:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
> > Unless you care about performace. Which is the main reason to use different
> > packages for each CPU type.
>
> I compile my own kernels, and have
Hi,
My name is Rahul Jain, I Have recently created a site www.footzyrolls.com,
i
need ur reviews, ur feedback, about this site. Also I am requesting for
dig exchange, if you have please send me your dig url, I will dig them, it
will be
beneficial for both of us, send me your dig url, will
need to be setgid? I think it's terrible to have any user
able to burn or screw up a burn... why can't they use sudo or su?
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -/- <-
n
> to a CD. Also, X authority stuff is messy to transfer between
> users.
I don't see how sgid cdrom will help here. Just make it non-sgid, and if
they're a member of group cdrom, they can burn a cd, period. X authority is
easy, just su, don't s
erstand why MMX or 3dnow apps can't be used if the kernel isn't
compiled to support them. Only the K7 configuration adds 3dnow support, but
3dnow in mpg123 works (or at least seems to) on my k6-3 with k6 chosen for the
cpu type in the kernel config.
--
-> -
merged, so
at least it will help there.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -/- <-
-> -/- "I never could get
DE drives cannot do disconnect/reconnect like SCSI
drives can. The best way would be to have one IRQ used for each IDE drive,
which is pretty tough to do on an x86 system. Hopefully your BIOS can allow
this sort of setup, since IRQ sharing still causes a bit of a performance hit.
--
-
faster. The best part is
> that the card only costs about $25.
Yep, but the problem there is figuring out how to get each channel on a unique
IRQ. With some BIOSes, it's just not possible.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
->
run
> on it's own, I think that this is a limitation of CPU and bus performance
> (which will be the main factor when you have 8 drives in an array).
Are you sure they two channels are not sharing an IRQ?
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <
e there should be meta-packages for packages that have embedded version
numbers like that. Or maybe the build-dep on libstdc++2.10-dev indicates that
the package relies on some g++ brokenness ;)
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- htt
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 03:39:42PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> > Bureaucracy is integral to an organization such as Debian.
>
> I beg to disagree. :)
Maybe we need a subcommitte to determine the validity of that statement ;)
--
-> -/-
es (which I don't think
> master provides). I think someone was working on ETRN recently, which is also
> supported by fetchmail...
hrm... having fetchmail ssh in and grab the mail directly from the spool would
be kind of cool... :)
--
-> -/-
e SGI acl package,
which I don't believe has been put into unstable by Nathan yet. However, the
source from SGI is debianized, so building debs should be quite simple.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=
t;
> and how do you solve the requirement to use gcc version 2.91.66
> for compiling?
the gcc 2.95 in unstable works great. it's gcc 2.96 that's the real problematic
compiler. (of course)
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\
7;
> x-
> -x
>
Identical behavior with zsh from unstable here.
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -/- <-
-> -/- "I never could get the hang of Thursdays." - HHGTTG
viewer?
>
> If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
>
> Your opinion will be appreciated.
>
How interesting. I wonder what drugs posessed them to think we'd be
interested in this... :)
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain -
hat.
> These are the only errors I get... This must be some bug in gcc on powerpc as
> it compiles cleanly on i386 (and from looking on ftp.debian.org on other
> platforms also). I don't even have idea how to bite this...
I'm only on x86 here, so all
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
...
> > you should stick to gcc 2.95 for compiling the kerne
bian.org/90091
>
> Maybe looking on the web for "unofficial apt sources" will help you
> find some .debs (or should I say ".debz"? ;-)
the offical lame sources (latest beta) include a debian/ directory, so building
a deb is as easy as debian/rules binary (a
20 matches
Mail list logo
