> one of rc.d configuration. So please make this information more visible
> when looking for it from the dpkg-side. Some kind of xref in `dpkg'
> manual would help.
Well I reckon it's not really well documented, I'm not not sure where
to put that. dpkg is maybe n
g
version informations and that in fact more affect testing than what we
know.
Though OTOH, unstable has many more bugs than testing that are _not_
in testing for sure :) But I know no numbers here, as the one buscan
gives are for all packages, not only th
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:31:22AM +, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Wed June 4 2008 00:59:15 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > a broken software, or an inadequate one is more a problem to
> > me than not having it in Debian. Debian is about quality, not
> > quantity.
>
> (1) Pi
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:11:51PM +, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Arguments like
>
> On 2008-06-04 15:34, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> (2) To a user who wishes to use a working feature of an imperfect
> >> package, Debian is better with the imperfect package tha
(here bazaar is a backend I suppose it's rather easy
to disable) ;
* vcs-load-dirs (ditto).
So the question is what do we do ? is someone going to fix it ? or
should I open bugs on config-manager and vcs-load-dirs to drop their
depend upon bazaar ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzi
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:20:25PM +, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:56 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Bazaar currently suffers from #454313, but has reverse dependencies
> > which prevent its sane removal from testing. It looks to me that bazaar
> > is
you really mean to provide something like ia32-apt-get, what you
ought to do is to:
- help the user create and maintain a proper 32bits chroot;
- let ia32-apt-get or whatever it's called be a forward to running
apt-get inside that chroot;
- find a way to let the user run commands
lds nothing with the .16 version, libmysql_r.so
has *not* an ABI that includes the one of libmysqlclient.so.
IOW programs that would be built against libmysqlclient.so on other distros
will not work on Debian at all if you do that.
As of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning you can probably work it around
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:01:21PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > To help packages like Apache which have some parts like libaprutil
> > that wants to link against libmysqlclie
$ combinediff aa-to-ab.diff /dev/null
unchanged:
--- aa 2009-08-06 18:25:44.875327948 +0200
+++ ab 2009-08-06 18:25:50.107327652 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
toto
-tuti
+tutu
titi
Cheers,
--
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit
Tél : +33 (0)1
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:33:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Those are actually valid ed scripts IIRC.
Okay, sorry, I meant to remove that sentence that is actually wrong...
sorry 'bout that.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@de
calls patch(1) to
apply the patches, à la cdbs-simple-patchsys.
--
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >> Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> >> >
> >> > (filterd
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:04:34PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> retitle 485330 Allow context diff in debian/patches/ in 3.0 (quilt) format
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > That said, yes, using non-unified diff is as laughable as using RCS or
/restart anymore.
So I'd say that even for Linux we want some kind of sysvinit like
scripts anyways.
--
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rt for enabling it on Linux architectures.
> +
> + -- Manoj Srivastava Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:15:46 -0500
Isn't it a duplicate of #543420 where the maintainer claims upstream
doesn't want such a patch ?
--
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:52:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:40:44PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Sep 06, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > > > Whe
sider adopting DEP3 without those "fixes". With those fixes though,
it's just a tiny bit of effort for them, so you'll instead probably see
quite a fast adopting rate for DEP3...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
O
can cherry-pick patches and format-patch them away. If you
ask them to add one missing header like the actual source or commid-id
they took the patch from, they'll probably do it (I would at least). If
you ask to rewrite the full stuff, then really, "go to hell" will
probably
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:23:50PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:30:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> Anyway, I'd rather wait some time until people have tried using this
> >> f
going in the good direction.
He's annoyed I sent that mail so late (and FWIW sorry but I hadn't the
time to do it before, and when I had time in august I hadn't
connectivity.. but whatever) but I think the proposal will be amended so
that we're co
anyway. If GObject or gpointer changes, symbol versioning doesn't
> > save you because _GtkTextChildAnchor is a public type
>
> This can all be solved using symbol versioning. Buf it will
> probably require alot of work to get it righ
se that is the exception.
Not the reverse. This is a major (if not _THE_ major) annoyance with the
BTS. FWIW this is a long discussed issue, and the BTS maintainers do not
share this opinion (that mailing @ should also mail the submitter)
so we're basically
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:08:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > When the maintainer think the bug reporter is not to be annoyed, then he
> > should mail nnn-silent or whatever, because that is the exception
bscribed
Easy way to override 2: let reportbug have a
--do-not-subscribe-me-to-bugs--I-mean-it--I-really-want-to-be-a-PITA-for-the-maintainer
for people that never remember about the pseudo-header.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
e.
I'm not sure if we're ready for this transition yet though, I'll let luk
or other RA/RM check if now is the best moment to do so.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Dear developers,
> > >
> > > There is a new version of
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
&
n dpkg, then pushed to user, then used, IOW only
squeeze+1 would be a target for "Supersedes" use anyway.
[2] yes slow, because for each package install, dpkg would have to
wonder if anything supersedes it, and deal with all the issues that
would arise if _two_ binary packages S
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> &g
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:16:52PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On lördagen den 19 september 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > There is one point in having the transitional package: it ensures that
> > no package does try to take "foo" as a package name in $stable +
the package actually is bogus from the beginning]
For all I care you cannot exploit this bug, unless you can make the nsd
user write symlink to files there. If this is asking for trouble, and my
next upload is going to fix that, it's not really worth the fuss about
c
ore precise
that RSN.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpDdfzQxDog6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; F1BCDB73
> > > | gpg: Good signature from "Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > > | [-- End of PGP output --]
Given that Aurélien's message was signed with his key, I really find
that rant pointless.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
use they just
fear the length and complexity of getting their account back.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpjj7n2RWWMo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
That wouldn't hurt the Debian project, or at least much less
> than poorly maintaining my packages.
>
> Maybe the time before the DPL election could be use to find out how data
> from MIA could also be used in this process ?
Then you'll get the WaT mail and have a chance to pon
that doesn't use an ordered flatfile for its
> data storage?
I totally agree with that. the _gnu libc_ getpwuid implementation is
nothing, even not a de facto standard. I'm almost sure it does not
behave the same on other OS'es.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpE2dBMFwBkX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:45:53AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Pierre> I totally agree with that. the _gnu libc_ getpwuid
> Pierre> implementation is nothing, even not a de
t's different in that it's recent...
>
> How does being recent make it relevant to a GNOME discussion?
>
> How is it different from all the other recent terrorist acts in a way that
> makes it relevant to a discussion of GNOME?
Am I mistaken or this is a flame on how
our ISP has bad caching for its DNS resolution.
FYI rietz (the machin the bts is on) has been down for 8 hours or so.
To understand sam's post http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony#Verbal_irony
may be useful.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAI
need proof, look at the libc: too many unanswered bugs, it should not be
in testing. End of story.
The releasable set of packages is now void, we can release any minute
now !
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpD8HXkVebpJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on't.
Sorry to seem pissed, but well, I am. Your mail (and others with the
same thoughts) are completely disconnected from reality. Totally.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpQ4i5KAhS20.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n fact, I would argue that the more reports you receive, the more you
> should endeavour to make sure that they are properly triaged and that
> the submitters know you are working on them.
well, that would be a lie: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) we don't work on them. So all's
for the best, i
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:32:41PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:55:39AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >
> > And btw, help for bug triaging for any of those kind of packages is
> > vastly appreciated... But here is a newsflash: 100 bugs
e project}/
[0] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpdzsQNWW4OA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070226 03:03]:
> > So now let's do a simple calculation. 100 bugs, 20 minutes, that's
> > 2000 minutes, over 6 weeks, that's 333 minutes a week, meaning
e, I quite choke on his words, because I really
think KDE packaging workflow has never been better in the last 3 years.
It does not mean it can't be even better, but we're definitely working in
the good direction, and are not slugged either.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpjT5adoGCyn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:07:20PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said:
> > I was previously beeing ironic, now I'm not anymore.
>
> No, previously you were being sarcastic. There is a difference between
> the two.
>
>
ce on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm currently trying to
reduce the >= important bugs to only a few relevant ones, while Aurélien
is busy making it build, then work on all $archs around.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
he teams can't keep up. They're not here
for making the coffee and photocopies, but really to do the same work as
the full DD's.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpAGxD05Fjys.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e a very bad developer. I hereby think that you should be expelled
in retaliation.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp87RsrDjXsI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2006/01/msg00037.html
We've seen how good it was for us, at least in the KDE team we got
about ... errr... 0 help offers.
Could one stop thinking teams packaging large things are as
uncommunicative as some core teams in debian ? Actuall
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:37:56PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:04:47AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote
found. Stop.
that's because ko is not a valid locale specifier.
$ LC_MESSAGES=ko_KR.utf8 make
make: *** 타겟이 지정되지 않았고 메이크파일이 없습니다. 멈춤.
You can get valid locale specifier that work on your system with
locale -a.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
SAGES=ko_KR.utf8 locale|grep LC_MESS
LC_MESSAGES=ko_KR.utf8
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpmCBUcG2FH4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;to not admit sth"
implicates active denial in my understanding. As a member of such
teams, and co-issuer of help requests statements on user lists
(debian-kde@) I did felt quite itched by Eduard statement.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpnWteLu66vy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
discussions, but I'd really like names here. In fact, that seems
pretty contradictory with the very notion of a team. Of course, there is
teams with 1 single member in it in debian, but that's not a "large
team" and is out of the scope if I'm not mistaken.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpoNrC6sLxAp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:03:40PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 18:57 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > but I would
> > obviously lessen my implication and work for other teams where I've a
> > single damn chance to see my contribution to be com
the latent criticism of the big teams to
hide their understaff problem. It's blatantly bogus hence iritating,
almost insulting.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpDl4u7GFVqs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it seems one of our DPL candidates thinks the same :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpIrJEc2DCc5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:49:56PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Like every packaging team in debian, mailing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] depending on how old the team is. Usually that list
> > is in
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > And if your point is that the current BTS UI sucks, then well, yes I
> > believe it, and it seems one of our DPL candidates thinks the same
>
> As I've indi
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:47:09PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
>
> > The mail you are answering to was against forums, not really against
> > the BTS btw.
>
> Bonsoir Pierre,
>
> I have lur
; > to
] ] > > hide their understaff problem. It's blatantly bogus hence iritating,
] ] > > almost insulting.
] ] >
] ] > Don't you wonder why it is perceived like that?
Which do seem like a quite not very hidden accu
mportant. Just
know that none of the suggestions made so far would have helped me more
when I was searching who/what to help, it would even have bored me.
shouting for help everywhere is like noise: it's absurdly painful, and
will itch people way too much.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
et to build-depends upon python-all-dev (that will pull
everything you need to build python packages) additionnaly to your usual
non python-ic build depends.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpdEVSaAFZF1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rrently in a hiatus, even with libc2.5, as
we will probably drop linuxthreads support, and that no viable NPTL port
exists yet.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madis
ded*
>
> See also
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/what_timezones_have_you_uploaded_debian_packages_from.html
>
> Christoph
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp2E6lVIMnga.pgp
Description: PGP signature
? I fail to see the logic in there
> As far as I know, no program in Debian actually uses this code, it's
> just inherited from upstream libraries.
AFAICT Debian just ignores patents, else we would have to remove maybe
70% of the archive. Are IDEA patents actively enforced ?
e info available.
> #8 0x in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
because it is for me.
the very fact that you still have function names without the -dbg is
because OOo is C++ and that "thanks to" the C++ symbols names mangling
it's able to go back to the re
> > too hard. Not sure.
>
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
> I am CCing this mail to debian-devel. Lets see if we can get some
> help there.
>
> Hi all,
> Please have a look at this bug report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
ces (values of some variables or so) and
see textually if sensitive informations are in there or not.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpNBHNkLffwg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r options available for us to avoid hard coding IP
> subnet information in the squid, sysklogd and cfservd configuration
> files?
Well, don't all those daemons use /etc/hosts.{allow,deny} ?
I know it's not *exactly* what you wanted, but afaict hosts.* are wa
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:20:02PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Pierre Habouzit]
> > It's not doable, because the POSIX getnetent answers in a struct
> > getent that cannot store the netmask, a simple getnetent(3) has the
> > answer. And that's the reason wh
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:37:35PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>php-json-ext
False positive, I already contacted you on this, recent php5 has json
support upstreams now (and you agreed to enable that builtin as it adds
no new dependency), a
ponsorees sometimes have many sponsors, and well, I
just want katie's ack when I does the upload to be sure I did not
screwed up, but I don't care when I'm not the uploader.
IOW, I do second nion request.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
-
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpNZvnGDFyfp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:20:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be
> > implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is
> > s
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:05:31AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on
> > google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on
, at least, it's Debian's
position for now.
There is no troll, only misunderstanding from your end :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp6PZ41aj5zn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gress?
We're still waitinf for the lufthansa machines to set it up :/
> also, where do I get the source code from (since the link
> http://greek0.net/div/checklib.tar.gz seems broken)?
>
> maybe the source code may be uploaded in the alioth project
that would be go
asn't reading my calendar properly, we're in 2007
not 1997, sorry).
FWIW, I don't think your initiative will help doing anything concrete,
and I strongly regret it.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpqV6twR9znI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Though, upstreams doing this could also I'd say use symbol versionning
and bump the version of this symbol if it behaviour changed, so that the
binary couldn't be used on an earlier version of the library by mistake,
depends on what this "extension" of the API really
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:07, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > and the debian-www team is recovering from the
> > shock that HTML 4.01 has been released recently and that CSS2 is almost
> > stable (err wait, I wasn&
good demonstration of what I
meant. Further comments are not really needed.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpmHfFCkUI1q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tyle=gnu in etch. Hence e.g. if libxml2 has been
build with -hash-style=gnu you won't be able to link any program against
it.
The glibc shlibs is a very loosy and convoluted way to make sure that
the toolchain is recent enough, because the change was uncoordinat
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:54:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:58:54PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > > and the debian-www team is recovering from the
> > > > shock that HTML 4.01 has been released recently and that CSS2 is almost
> &g
things are not very easy to use, take the number of
revisions per upstream release, it could either be that upstream
releases are not done very often, and that the maintainer does a good
job patching some upstream bugs, or that OTOH he's doing a poor job and
needs 10 uploads to get thing
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:55:12PM +0200, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Because of some dumbfold (self created) problems, I am willing to test
> >&
ly at random) C++ libraries that do not use
symbols visibility, hence exposing myriad of non exported symbols, which
will create new shlib bumps for ... nothing.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpq8PavhzxpP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
al issue IMHO is indeed bandwidth, as this is still a quite
expensive resource.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpLl79I7b2Oo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e to expect quite some breakage from less strict
> dependencies).
symbol visibility support in gcc is not that old, and many upstream
don't use it (yet). For them there is many many many private symbols in
the libraries, and well, they don't matter at all.
as such a
distribution service exists, I've for sure some dozens of gigabyte and
10 to 20 Mbits on a server of mine to be part of the network. _that_
would be 100x more productive than to try to take shortcuts on the
archive for bad reasons.
PS: Oh and I don't say
bc are very useful to check that
the libc builds and passes the testsuite properly. If we have to wait
for 2 weeks to have an answer to that test (and it's a still running
counter for now) then it's already useless anyways.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
things would happen if the package was rejected from NEW and then
> reuploaded with the same version number but with a different set of bugs
> closed.
alternatively, REJECT scripts can be updated to reopen bugs they
closed in that case.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
the 50 most
> 'delicate' packages is in:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~enrico/2007-06/sample-reverse-sat.txt
wow, this looks pretty accurate, though adduser seems misplaced in
that list. You should remove arch:all packages, they are seldomly a
concern for migrations.
--
·O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nsd3
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : NLnet Labs
* URL : http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/
* License : Mostly BSD with some bits in GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Descr
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:35:25PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Saturday 23 June 2007 15:57, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > * Package name: nsd3
>
> >NSD3 is an fast, authoritative only, high performance, simple
> >and open source name s
301 - 400 of 601 matches
Mail list logo
