sive
effort into it.
It might also be easier to implement a new, less crufty, command line
shell (and programmatic interface to standard command line tools) from
scratch while one was at it.
--
Peter Eckersley
Department of Computer Science & mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
ith your project. Take a look at Computerbank, and if the
goals are close enough, perhaps we should start considering
international affiliations (Computerbank has several chapters in
different cities, and we've found that this has certainly been to our
advantage - international links would be
have volunteered.
--
|> |= -+- |= |>
| |- | |- |\
Peter Eckersley
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde
for techno-leftie inspiration, take a look at
http://www.computerbank.org.au/
pgpUW4UzSBT45.pgp
Description: PGP signature
asons, but
another one, which is denies access rather than providing it:
If my I want a file to be readable by everybody *except* user fred, I
can set permissions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l plot-against-fred
-rw----r--1 pde fred 1 Dec 27 17:12 plot-against-fred
Of course, I need
> In any event, looking in bugs.debian.org for the old bug that this change
> closed might give you more info than this rough guess.
>
The bug isn't there anymore. Does anyone remember what it was?
--
|> |= -+- |= |>
| |- | |- |\
Peter Eckersley
([EMAIL PROT
| | ((_(_)| )_)
>-:-=] Debian GNU/Linux [=-:-| \_((_(_)|/(_)
>\ (
> \_)
>
> :*)
>
Argh.
This is terrible. There's no /usr/share/ascii-art! What has Debian
been doing all these years?
I guess we could resort to
append="init=/usr/games/fortune ascii-art&q
n of gzip is interpreting codes
like "repeat the 17 characters you saw 38 characters ago".
Other, more sophisticated algorithms, like bzip2 (go and read about the
Burrows-Wheeler Transform, it's amazing ;) would be much harder to hack in any
reasonable way.
--
|> |
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:58:26PM +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
> > Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > So why not solve the compression problem at the root? Why not try to
> > >
sktop market share by looking at web statistics.
--
Peter Eckersley[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Staff TechnologistTel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier FoundationFax +1 415 436 9993
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
rto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be sort of pointless unless we could find a way to all browse
> from the same IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
--
Peter Eckersley[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Staff Technologist
On Sep 22, Marco D'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This means, in practice, that many sites will be able to track
> > Debian users by their User-Agent, even if (say) the user is blocking
>
the case of Privoxy, this would
mean having all of the default Privoxy distributions (and especially
those that are shipped with Tor) use a single User-Agent. We were also
planing to send those trivial Privoxy configuration patches, it'd be
great if we could get the community t
developer community supports
it, and think there could be advantages in terms of allowing other packages to
assume that Certbot is installable, or even Depend: on it, for enabling TLS.
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff.org
Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier FoundationFax +1 415 436 9993
e the option of sending email to the registered account
email addresses associated with older clients that are about to be
incompatible, provided that sys admins chose to give us an email address when
they created their Let's Encrypt accounts.
--
Peter Eckersley
's especially
tricky to expect long-run-future-compatibility from a service that's only been
online for a year.
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff.org
Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier FoundationFax +1 415 436 9993
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:35:46AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Peter Eckersley wrote:
>
> > currently working with an ACME backwards compatibilty window of 6-12 months,
> > but probably not longer than that.
>
> I note that letsencrypt 0.4.1
hristian. This policy removes what might have
been the simplest option, and seems to mean that we'll want to work hard on a
plan
where Certbot is in Stretch in a way that works both for us upstream and for
the Debian release team.
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff
ng.
We'd be willing to consider defining an upstream stable release series to
formalize this, if the Debian community views that as especially important.
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff.org
Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier FoundationFax +1 415 436 9993
e new libraries or versions of libraries, but I think we can ensure
that the features are optional and the depenencies are not strict (ie,
they're only Recommends: or Suggests: in Debian packaging terms)
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff.org
Chief Computer Scientist
27;d probably do is
tell people, "please install a copy of Cerbot greater than X; you can go
to https://certbot.eff.org/ if you need advice on how to do that on your OS"
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@eff.org
Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131
Electronic Frontier FoundationFax +1 415 436 9993
.org/issue28742
I'm adding the --config flag you noticed as another case of that bug. We'll
try to get a fix for that (which will probably require vendorng the argparse
library) included in upstream Certbot before Stretch freezes ;)
--
Peter Eckersleyp...@e
comment-258579483
>
> I've now created /etc/letsencrypt/cli.ini and removed my
> drop-in that modifies the systemd service. Thanks, this thread
> has already helped me make my setup saner. :)
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
> [1] Probably should add openat,fstat
22 matches
Mail list logo
