Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xsltsl
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Steve Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xsltsl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : XSLT Stan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pilotqof
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pilot-qof/
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dpkg-view
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dpkg-view.alioth.debian.org
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: glipper
Version : 0.89
Upstream Author : Sven Rech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://glipper.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: apt-cross
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://buildd.emdebian.org/repos/tools/apt-cross/
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-minibrowser
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : Philippe De Swert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/gpe-mini-browser.shtml
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-gallery
Version : 0.97
Upstream Author : Damien Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/gpe-gallery.shtml
* License : GPL
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Description : GPE image gallery and viewer, with slideshow support
> > A small application for viewing images in GPE. Intended to s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-clock
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/gpe-clock.shtml
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libgpeschedule
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Florian Boor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-conf
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Florian Boor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/gpe-conf.shtml
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-appmgr
Version : 2.8
Upstream Author : Robert Mibus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/GPE-appmgr.shtml
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libxsettings
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://standards.freedesktop.org/xsettings-spec/0.5/
* License : RedHat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libxsettings-client
Version : 0.17
Upstream Author : Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://standards.freedesktop.org/xsettings-spec/0.5/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-soundserver-0.4
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/GPE-soundbite.shtml
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-mixer
Version : 0.42
Upstream Author : Nils Faerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-su
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-shield
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Florian Boor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-watch
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Nils Faerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-what
Version : 0.43
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-confd
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : GPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-vfile-asdata-perl
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Jay Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-vFile
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-vcard-perl
Version : 2.00
Upstream Author : Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-vCard
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: emdebian-tools
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://buildd.emdebian.org/repos/tools/em_make/
* License : GPL
an,
dpkg-buildpackage and linda can all be prepared for the new behaviour.
If lintian functionality isn't restored soon, how can new packages be
uploaded safely?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: CashUtil
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/cashutil/
* License : GPL
Description
e will give the prize money to the FFII if he wins.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpfoge2jNwFI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/minor bug in apt to request a clearer error message but
I don't see that it is a bug in amarok.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpzYgfd9EKtF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Looks OK now - maybe just a delay?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-tetris
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : David Necas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/
* License : GPL
Program
u seeing it as "resolved"? It's still listed as outstanding
> on
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=edac-utils;dist=unstable
>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=edac-utils
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libgtkstylus
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
* License : LGPL
Program
discussions on xmms and
audacity. Such "fuzzy" relationships are best done with tags, IMHO.
(Also, let's not add yet more lines to the Packages.gz file?)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.
fcashobjects0 ...
(with -dev, -dbg etc. as normal)
Applications then mix-and-match object libraries (and/or their own
objects) at compile time and call routines in libqof1|2 to dynamically
load the backend module as requested by the user.
The transition is the perfect time to change the names of t
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 19:19 +, Neil Williams wrote:
One little note on these bugs:
1. All bugs below have patches attached that have been carefully tested
with your package to avoid any changes in the Debian packages. As such,
the patches can be applied without you needing to worry about
451281
newt 465105
openssl465248
pam 284854
popt 282913
procps 451812
psmisc 465226
readline5 465237
rxvt 465214
tcp-wrappers 451854
udev 465156
wget 451285
xdemineur 465117
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is also in experimental and therefore
builds of your package try to use this experimental version which then
fails because experimental is not a complete distribution.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
l
Debian box without implementing sbuild?
(This is also holding up my own upstream work which needs a fix in this
version of libgda3-3.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This i
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> > gtk-doc-tools is not being picked up as a build depends during port
> > builds, despite it being located during normal debuild, pdebuild and
> > pbuilder checks on m
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:28 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > gtk-doc-tools is not being picked up as a build depends during port
> > > builds, despite it being lo
/www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
This isn't the kind of thing that generally needs discussion on
debian-devel.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
er possible for all such metadata - maybe even
migrate some existing data in debian/control to debtags.
This specific request, IMHO, is probably best done via links on the
Homepage URL anyway.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:16 -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please can this 'trend' be stopped here and now?
> >
> > The Packages.gz file is already enormous (especially
be done to have at least simple bugs resolved fast.
Well, maybe you could help with d-i rather than just point out the
negative?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp47Yva2wtZc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t
but it does make life easier and it does solve some problems inherent in
other methods. (It brings in one or two problems of its own too.)
(In terms of cross-building / debian-xcontrol, Simon, it's a
Build-Depends-Tool.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-free
-Depends on pkg-config in the source
package.
Is that suitable as a Policy clause? (probably needs a few tweaks for
clarity and examples in clause 1). It may well cause a few packages to
depend or build-depend on pkg-config even though another dependency also
requires it but duplication of depen
stream are busy with other things, solve the problem yourself and
make the upload - ask the security team for help with that side if you
are unsure.
Solve the problem - if upstream come back to you with a different fix
later, you can always migrate to that fix.
--
Neil Williams
=
ame for NEW anyway, hence I think it should stay as-is.
Dropping this merely for the convenience of DM's when the real problem
is delays in NM is trying to fix the wrong problem in the wrong place,
IMHO.
> But I don't
> think you will be able to. In fact, most people might w
ication then I have cause to worry about your ability to
maintain a library in Debian in the first place. It doesn't give me any
confidence in you or in DMs in general.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:12 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >
> > 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
> > FOO_CFLAGS
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 19:15 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> >> What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >>
> >&
epend on pkg-config *if* they need
that to work with other libraries. (That's the usual case - most
applications will end up running pkg-config so most applications will
end up with a Build-Depends: pkg-config, )
--
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:23 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> First of all, I skipped a large part of this thread, so I'm sorry if
> this has come up before.
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > And by this definition, it is the package
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:12 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> > >
> &g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: soci
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Maciej Sobczak, Stephen Hutton, David Courtney,
Pawel Aleksander Fedorynski, Rafal Bobrowski, Mateusz Loskot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: estron
Version: 0.7.0
Upstream Authors: Neil Williams, Linas Vepstas
URL: http://estron.alioth.debian.org/
License: LGPL
sed and you need to reset
the current umask for the root user.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
lf would show some
> sign of activity. Maybe he has a mail configuration problem ?
and maybe he's just busy, like many of us.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 19:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 18:02:28 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that this bug should be closed, it certainly does not
> > appear to be a "general" bug because only one package creates that
&g
in/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] http://www.emdebian.org/bugs.php (parses the same tags)
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/EmdebianPolicy
[4] http://www.emdebian.org/packages/search.php
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
This is filed against general in advance of a buildd.emdebian.org
pseudo-package becoming available. See #480408
Emdebian has a set of prebuilt binary packages which allow an 80%
reduction in the total installation size of the final Debian system,
acheived thro
Package: general
Severity: normal
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that block the use of packages that
crossbuild successfully.
libldap-2.4.2 fails to cross build:
configure: error: crossing compiling: use
--with-yielding_select=yes|
Package: general
Severity: normal
libgpewidget includes documentation files required by Debian Policy and
is unable to remove these using the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nodocs" option
due to a lack of support for this option in debhelper.
Documentation needs to be removed when preparing Emdebian packages
Package: general
Severity: normal
This bug is in preparation for a buildd.emdebian.org pseudo-package.
This is not a bug in gpe-clock because gpe-clock is doing what is
required by CDBS - it is a bug in buildd.emdebian.org because
Emdebian needs to be able to build as many packages as possible wi
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that block the use of packages that
crossbuild successfully or fail to cross build themselves after an
update in Debian.
$ emsource --status cu
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that block the use of packages that
crossbuild successfully.
$ emsource --status avahi
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
Chec
Package: general
Severity: normal
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated because the new version fa
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that block the use of packages that
crossbuild successfully.
$ emsource --status curl
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
Check
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ emsource --status e2fsprogs
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
W: Unable to locate package libuuid1-udeb
W: Unable to locate package libblkid1-udeb
W: Unable to locate package e2fsprogs-udeb
Checking status of e2fsprogs i
Package: general
Severity: normal
$ emsource --status file
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
Checking status of file in /opt/emdebian/trunk/f/file/trunk/
4 emdebian patch files
0 debian patch files
Checking emdebuild status in /opt/emdebian/trunk/f/file/trunk/
build log:
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated be
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated be
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated be
Package: general
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated be
Package: general
Severity: normal
$ emsource --status ncurses
Checking the apt-cross cache is up to date for arm.
W: Unable to locate package lib64ncurses5
W: Unable to locate package lib64ncurses5-dev
W: Unable to locate package lib32ncurses5
W: Unable to locate package lib32ncurses5-dev
W: Unabl
Package: general
Severity: normal
In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
status bugs about packages that fail to crossbuild successfully, despite
building successfully in the past. i.e. where an existing package in
Emdebian cannot be updated because the new version fa
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 22:31 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11382 March 1977, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Package: general
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
>
> Yes
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 13:47 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm using quiet now so there should be no more CC'd reports to
> > -devel with the next batch of reports. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Why are you f
Call it a feature enhancement if you like but it still ends up in a bug
tracker of one kind or another so might as well call it a bug IMHO.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ging bugs for the purposes of tracking forwarded bugs for a
long time.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d in the release
phase for Lenny, as a bug submitter I might be a little concerned.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
added upstream (Closes: #1234)
Assuming both refer to the same bug report, I personally prefer the
Fixes: #1234 approach:
foo (0.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Remove patch 'patch-file-name' included upstream (Closes: #1234)
-- Neil Williams <[EMAIL PRO
reason and we get a FTBFS RC bug.
Detecting which files are changed as a by-product of a patch isn't
always particularly obvious.
Incidentally, you can collapse the zgrep into lsdiff -z:
$ lsdiff -z *.diff.gz | grep -v debian
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.or
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 18:43 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However, from a bug submitter point of view, I don't think I want to
> > see the bug report kept open (tagged divergence) after it has
> > actually been cl
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 15:30 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > 1 - User reports bug with a patch against upstream code
> > [open, patch]
> > 2 - maintainer forwards the patch upstream
> > [confi
d in an upstream release, I still see
that the package has bugs that are Fixed but not Closed. bts-link takes
care of updating the tags on the Fixed bugs (because they are also
forwarded) so that when the upstream release is made, I know which
patches are included upstream. I can then remove th
ffers) - this sounds like the
patches.d.o idea.
I'll stick to Problem 1. :-)
I think you're right that there are two distinct problems - although I'm
still not convinced that Problem 2 is sufficiently common to require a
whole new bug/patch tracker.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ether that
> particular point is in the upstream bug tracker or the BTS is
> inconsequential. The essential point is that it does exist and it is
> linked from both entry points.
I'm not sure which bug tracker I was thinking of regarding logins but
upstreams that only have private e
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 18:51 +0100, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Yes - supported by the use of (Fixed: #1234) in
> > debian/changelog, .changes etc. and a revised interface for PTS and DDPO
> > to discriminate between Fixed and Clos
e list of diversion bugs
obtained via SOAP. Lintian doesn't currently do SOAP queries of the BTS
but a QA script should be relatively easy to create. Maybe bts-link
could be drafted in to provide some leverage over pseudo-headers mapping
to an upstream bug tracker.
Lintian could check that the pseudo-header exists.
--
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
dsc
I won't upload to ftp-master just yet - I do need to do some more tests
to ensure that other GPE packages build and function correctly so that I
don't inadvertently trigger a transition in over 40 packages.
;-)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > So I am running the relevant autotools at build time but I still get the
> > warning.
>
> If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure
hat can still be parsed by
gettext so that TDebs can read the translation strings from binary .mo
files.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 14:01 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > So I am running the relevant autotools at build time but I still get the
> >
ase remember that the
packages descriptions go into the dpkg database which is already too
big.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e dpkg database which is already too
> > big.
>
> What's an extra few MB plus parsing overhead when "everyone" has
> 250GB HDDs, multi-core 64-bit CPUs and 2+GB RAM?
I am going to assume you are not being serious.
Try 64Mb Flash, ARM5 CPU and 64Mb RAM.
--
Neil Wi
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> >> If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the
> >> changes which autotools ma
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 14:18:07 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > If it is just that 'quiet' supports what it does because that is all it
> > has needed to support so far, I'm fine with that. It just
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:45 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Ignore the CC for #482716 - the CC should be for #471263
[patch-systems]: please no patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff for
generated files
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:06 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 08:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Lots of other packages do this -- one of mine off the top of my head is
> >> xml-security-c.
&
1 - 100 of 1111 matches
Mail list logo
