On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 2:04 PM Andreas Ronnquist
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm maintaining a package (filezilla) which just got a bug report that
> it simply crashes on program start - It gets a SIGILL - "Illegal
> instruction". (#1076312 report [1]).
>
> After the reporter debugged it, it seems like it
Hi there,
After reading the documentation of 'man deb' I cannot see any
reference to any arbitrary length for filename in a deb package. For
instance I have filepath (including sub directories) that reach ~100
characters. the tar format completely support that, but I am having
some weird issue o
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:46 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > After reading the documentation of 'man deb' I cannot see any
> > reference to a
Hi Bart,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:43 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On W
Hi there,
I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using
cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package.
I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently
struggling on how to do it properly when installing python module
(what is the
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using
>> cmake so that the .deb produce
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb
>>>> handled by cmake.
>>>
>>
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:25:23PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> >> $ superdupertool libfoo.so
>> >>=> this lib requires libstdc++6 at least version 4.0.2
>
>> > dpkg-sh
Hi there,
Because of the recent feedback I got in building debian package
using cmake, I decided to rewrite the current -broken- support.
As far as I understand :
1. dpkg-buildpackage *has* to be the entry point (nothing else, not
even 'cmake')
2. dpkg-buildpackage requires a 'debian' subdir
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 3. I was suggested libopensync for cmake/debian package start.
>> 3.1 where is the internal name 'libopensync1exp3'
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 23 juin 2008 à 22:11 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>> That's just rude. Even if you are a super star in the debian-world
>> and a fantastic hacker, your comment can not
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:20 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > Stop. Don't even try to go further. This is NOT the right way. Your
>> > brand new wheels are going to drive you straigh
Hello there, long time !
[Take 2 of 'Generating debian package using cmake' has been rated
PJ-13-crude language, so let's try to make a clean sequel]
In take 1, I was generating debian using cmake internal implementation
of debian package, which as most of you know, was doomed to failure
In tak
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
>> under debian/ that should be ignored (since they can't be deleted as part of
>> a diff); I'm afr
'lo
Where should I report broken links from:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/new-maintainer
There is a link to :
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/new-maintainer.html#mentors
which does not exist.
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: vera++
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Maciej Sobczak
* URL : http://www.inspirel.com/vera/
* License : Boost
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Vera++ - Programmable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: cdash
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Julien Jomier
* URL : http://www.cdash.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: PHP, XSL
Description : An open source, web-based software
'lo
I am reading:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292205
But everytime I chroot into my 32bits system, part of my system
still sees me as my user:
$ sudo chroot ./Debian32Chroot
# id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
# echo $HOME
/home/mathie
Hi,
I have setup a ia32 chroot on my amd64 system, but I cannot install
default-jdk which is needed for my software:
Ref:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292205
Full log is:
$ sudo -H chroot ./Debian32Chroot
# apt-get install default-jdk
Reading pac
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> apt-get install schroot
> RTFM
Did you *actually* read it yourself ?
I'd suggest you reread it:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292437
There is no mention to chroot -H option whatsoever
Y
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Which obviously hadn't been updated in *years*. RT*appropriate*FM.
1. This is the #1 link on a google search,
2. this is listed as *Please either ask in IRC channel if unsure or
refer to the The Debian GNU/Linux AMD64 HOW-TO for a more up-t
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Johannes
Wiedersich wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> You do not need to be rude when I explicitly quote the actual doc I am
>> reading, which obviously should not recommend the use of chroot
>
> FWIW, this is the wrong mailing list for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: kwstyle
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Julien Jomier
* URL : http://public.kitware.com/KWStyle/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : style checker for source
Steve,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the upload of boost-defaults, a new package
that supplies unversioned -dev packages for Boost (libboost-dev, etc.)
that simply depend on the current "default" Boost version (today, it
is Boost 1.38.0)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: srcml
Version : 20061109
Upstream Author : Dr. Michael Collard, Jonathan Maletic
* URL : http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Hi there,
I am running into an issue, dicom3tools does not compile properly on
the buildd machine. The error is:
...
rm -rf transynu.h
nawk -f ../../.././libsrc/support/transyn.awk \
role=extern outname=transynu
<../../.././libsrc/standard/transyn.tpl
>transynu.h
rm -rf sopclu.h
Nevermind, the basic idea is described here:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/gawk/html_node/Special-FD.html
Sorry for the noise,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am running into an issue, dicom3tools does not compile properly on
> the buildd
Just for fun today, I tried to see the complete list of debian dev:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
-> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?all=1
List is empty for me...
weird...
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: igraph
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Gabor Csardi, Tamas Nepusz
* URL : http://igraph.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: r-cran-igraph
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Gabor Csardi
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pixelmed
Version : 20090816
Upstream Author : David Clunie
* URL : http://www.pixelmed.com/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : PixelMed Java DICOM Toolkit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: wrapitk
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : gaetan.lehmann
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/wrapitk/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Automated dynamic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: vtkedge
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Kitware, Inc.
* URL : http://www.vtkedge.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Library of advanced visualization and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: utfcpp
Version : 2.2.3
Upstream Author : Nemanja Trifunovic
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/utfcpp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A simple
Hi there,
I am starring at:
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gdcm
->
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gdcm&arch=hppa&ver=2.0.13-1&stamp=1256783874&file=log&as=raw
Linking CXX shared library ../../bin/libvtkgdcmJava.so
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-gdcm_2.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to
>> have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist
>> this package altogether.
>
> Even though they do
Hi there,
Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect:
There is directory:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/195.22/
However latest version detected is 190.42.2
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=nvidia-graphics-drivers
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 18:28 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
>>
>>> Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect:
>>>
>>> There is directory
Hi there,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to
>>> have to do s
Hi there,
I am trying to compile tulip (*) for debugging with:
$ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='noopt debug nostrip'
$ apt-get source tulip
$ cd tulip-3.1.2
$ dpkg-buildpackage
After installation, here is what objdump reveals (**). Does this means:
1. I did not export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS ?
2. There i
hi there,
I am looking for a package which would provide a csharp binding to a
C/c++ library to serve as reference (wrapped using swig).
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible,
>> but I do not know about the ABI. I really do not feel comfortable with
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>>> Well the size of the lib will change. I think the
Andreas,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>>> Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a
>>> couple of gray areas remaining:
>>>
>>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: dicom3tools
Version : 1.0.20081122
Upstream Author : David A. Clunie
* URL : http://www.dclunie.com/dicom3tools/workinprogress/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
>> from proprietary formats.
>>
>> Unix, Mac and Windows (Cygwin) command
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:14:29PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> > On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: gdcm
Version : 2.0.10
Upstream Author : Mathieu Malaterre
* URL : http://gdcm.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++, C#, Python, Java
Description : DICOM
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pvrg
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung
* URL : ftp://havefun.stanford.edu:pub/jpeg/JPEGv1.2.tar.Z.
* License : PUBLIC DOMAIN LICENSE
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/17/08 03:57, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
>>
>>
>> * Package name: pvrg
>> Version : 1.2.1
>> U
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/17/08 03:29, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
>>
>>
>> * Package name: dicomscope
>> Version : 3.5
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: dicomscope
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/dscope.php.en
* License : Copyright (C) 1994-2004, OFFIS
Programming Lang: C, C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: devide
Version : 8.5
Upstream Author : Charl P. Botha
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/devide/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Delft Visualization and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: opensourcepacs
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : UCLA Medical Imaging Informatics group
* URL : http://www.mii.ucla.edu/opensourcepacs/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Hi there,
I am working on the dicomscope package, and I was told there is an
issue with my package:
...
> E: dicomscope: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libjInterface.so
> N:
> N: Although the package includes a shared library, the package does
> not
> N: have a shlibs control
Hi,
I am currently working on integrating debian packaging system in
cpack (part of CMake, see cmake.org). Basically cpack used to have a
simple tarball system for creating package on *NIX. I simply had to
encapsulate this tarball within an 'ar'ball, with a control and a
md5sums file (*)
I am
Hi Antti-Juhani
On 8/6/07, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:34:40PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > I am currently working on integrating debian packaging system in
> > cpack (part of CMake, see cmake.org). Basically
Hi there,
I am reading:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526092#20
Could someone please let me know why exactly fop-hyph.jar cannot be
included as a debian package ? LPPL is technically allowed in debian,
right ?
Ref:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/hyphenation.html#li
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre writes:
>
>> I am reading:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526092#20
>
>> Could someone please let me know why exactly fop-hyph.jar cannot be
>> included as a deb
[Sorry for duplicate]
Hi there,
I am struggling to rebuild my package. I am thinking there is an
issue with libvtk-java. So I tried in my pbuilder env the following:
# apt-get build-dep vtk
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: xslthl
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Michal Molhanec, Jirka Kosek, Michiel Hendriks
* URL : http://xslthl.sf.net
* License : zlib/libpng License
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: xsddiagram
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Regis Cosnier
* URL : http://regis.cosnier.free.fr/?page=XSDDiagram
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description : XML Schema
Hi there,
I am looking at the page:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/doc-base-unknown-section.html
Clearly the line (and the href) is bogus:
"Refer to Debian doc-base Manual section 2.3.3 (The section field) for
details. "
Where should I fill a bug for that ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSU
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am interested in a set of programs, the ‘BEDtools’, whose source includes a
> convenience copy of the gzstream library.
>
> http://bedtools.googlecode.com
> http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/compgeom/gzstream/
>
> A quick apt-fi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: GoFigure2
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : gofigure2-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://gofigure2.sf.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Dear Debian Developers,
I would like to request a give back of GDCM on MIPS due to bug #591998. Even
after looking at the latest java-common upload:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/java-common/news/20100809T203343Z.html
I still do not understand when the buildd machine will be updated so tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: activiz.net
Version : 5.6.1
Upstream Author : kitware
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/avdownload.php
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Tool for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: mummy
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : kitware
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/avdownload.php
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : command line
Dear DDs,
A user discover the wrong source for paraview 3.8.1 were pushed to
debian repository. To fix this mistake, I asked for the removal of the
paraview package to be able to quickly reupload it.
This was very quickly executed by ftpteam. However even if paraview
has been removed from testi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: PythonQt
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Florian Link
* URL : http://pythonqt.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Dynamic Python binding for the Qt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: Log4Qt
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Martin Heinrich
* URL : http://log4qt.sf.net/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ port of the Log4j package
Hi,
What is the status of dep5(*) copyright file in debian ? I am using
dh_make for preparing packages, and I had report that the default
generated copyright template should be replaced by a dep5 one.
Should I fill a bug report ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
(*) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
--
Hi there,
I am trying to understand some license issue I am having. Could
someone let me know if the following is compatible with a debian
package:
>From the [For License Of Certain Hewlett-Packard Patents Relating To
Lossless and Near-Lossless Image Compression] page (*)
The following stateme
Hello,
I am trying to package a *binary* package. This is a commercial
software but for ease of installation I am simply repackaging it.
I am getting closer to my goal, one of the remaining issue is:
E: libactiviz: ldconfig-symlink-referencing-wrong-file
usr/lib/libvtktiff.so.5.4 -> ./libvtk
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to package a *binary* package. This is a commercial
> software but for ease of installation I am simply repackaging it.
>
> I am getting closer to my goal, one of the remaining issue is:
files.
(*)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian Installer
Date: Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Subject: gdcm_2.0.10-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
To: Mathieu Malaterre , Debian-Med
Packaging Team
Rejected: ma...@users.sourceforge.net is not authorised to sponsor uploads
===
Please
Hi there,
I am suffering from the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530384
which is basically the same as:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511709
and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488770
All I am trying to do is replace the
Hi,
I am getting a bizarre dep problem on alpha (only), see:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gdcm;ver=2.0.10-1;arch=alpha;stamp=1242615584
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mono-devel: Depends: mono-runtime (>= 2.0) but it is not installable
Depends: l
Hi there,
I could find the naming convention for C# binding:
http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-packaging.html#s-gac-naming-versioning
I am now looking for a similar page for a library that would be
wrapped in Java. What would be the convention for a foo.jar requiring
a gluelib
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Jun 08 18:12, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I could find the naming convention for C# binding:
>>
>> http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-packaging.html#s-gac-naming-versioni
Hi,
Could someone let me know what I should do when a binary package is
restricting me to a subset of architecture ? For instance libvtkgdcm
requires libvtk5-dev, but not libgdcm-tools. How can I express that in
my single control file for gdcm ?
Ref:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
T
hi,
I am reposting a previous post under a different Subject line,
hoping to get more (read: any) feedback.
I am currently maintaining the gdcm package:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
Is is written in -somewhat- portable C++ and should build with any
decent C++ compiler. However
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Alexander
Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
>
>> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
>> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
>> Binary package
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 16:13:58 +0200, a écrit :
>> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
>> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
>> Binary p
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre writes:
>
>> Let's consider one source package 'foo' which can be build using a
>> --enable-super-duper-3rd-party-lib. My control file is then:
>>
>>
>
Hello,
I had a network issue and had to re-run dupload a second time. Now a
partially *.changes files was updated, and I cannot do anything
anymore:
$ dupload --force gdcm_2.0.10-5_amd64.changes
dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
Checking signatures before upload..signatures are o
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11789 March 1977, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> I had a network issue and had to re-run dupload a second time. Now a
>> partially *.changes files was updated, and I cannot do anything
>> anymore:
>
> Either
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm struggling to get debian/watch working for the package jing-trang.
> The problem is upstream says Google no longer allows publishing
> tarballs under [0]. So they only have tag for the latest release [1].
> My question is, is
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new release of my package Gyoto should be built preferably with a
> C++11-capable compiler. It can be built with a reduced feature-set
> without, though.
>
> Is there a clever way to ensure that the default compiler is
> C++11-
RSA key ID 8AE09345
gpg: Good signature from "Mathieu Malaterre "
gpg: aka "Mathieu Malaterre "
gpg: aka "Mathieu Malaterre (sf.net)
"
gpg: aka "Mathieu Malaterre (LIRIS)
"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not
I could not find the answer anywhere. Why is arch:ppc64 not in the
`any-powerpc` definition ? I would have guessed arch:ppc64 to be very
close to arch:powerpc...
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:48:26AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> I could not find the answer anywhere. Why is arch:ppc64 not in the
>> `any-powerpc` definition ? I would have guessed arch:ppc64 to be very
>>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Sébastien Villemot
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the maintainer of julia (a technical computing language built on top
> of LLVM), I am wondering whether I should continue supporting the i386
> architecture.
>
> The bottom line is that julia needs SSE2 (and porting it to the
Hi,
I am starring at bug #758572. Basically OP reports that `cmake` is
underlinked, which is a serious issue as per policy. However when
reading the details it appears that this is a c++ weak symbol (AFAIK
no weak default definition is available). This weak symbol is
generated by default by gcc wh
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-10-28 17:20:02) at debian-vote@l.d.o
>> For the compiler, all of Debian is built with GCC, but some teams do
>> test builds with Clang and report bugs, which most maintainers merge
>> and some don't.
>
> Speaking
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jeremy wrote:
[...]
> Also, look at the success of the Raspberry Pi.
[...]
> Preferably open-source hardware. [...]
[...]
https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/TargetedHardware#Unsuitable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
While reading the wiki page for AutomaticDebugPackages, I was
wondering if it is possible to post-processed object file to
manipulate relatives path for debug info ?
Typical use case is that after installing the -dbg package, you end up
with a gdb backtrace saying:
[...]
brw_meta_fast_clear (brw=
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: jcm
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : David J. Eck
* URL : http://math.hws.edu/javamath
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java Components for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pirl
Version : 2.3.4
Upstream Author : Bradford Castalia
* URL :
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/software/PIRL_Java_Packages.shtml
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Java
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
