Hi Frank,
> Please calm down. Sure, it isn't usual to upload such a quick NMU, but
> (as Goswin already pointed out) such a bug that makes a package
> uninstallable that is a common build-depends can really hurt the
> autobuilders. You're free to discuss with lamont how to handle such
> cases in t
Hi Anibal,
On Saturday, 12 Feb 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 02:50:27PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> >Package: ftp.debian.org
> >Severity: wishlist
> >
> >Hello ftp-masters,
> >
> >It would be nice if there were a webpage (updated eg. once a day)
Hi Dan,
On Wednesday, 09 Feb 2005, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know you Debian people think it's just hilarious when users try to
> apt-get upgrade during the period after when the Packages files
> arrive on the mirrors, but before the packages they describe have
> fully arrived.
Hi Jeroen,
> How mirrors do their mirroring is up to the local mirror administrator,
> not to the general debian developer's community. Debian could promote
> this two-phase mirroring a bit more maybe, and/or provide nice scripts,
> that's probably why #6786 is still open.
>
> BUT DEBIAN CANNOT I
Hi Marc,
On Monday, 07 Mar 2005, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-05 17:52]:
> >>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/03/msg00019.html
> >
> >But it is very s
Hi Hamish,
On Saturday, 12 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> Is there anything that can be done to help with arm/mipsel?
Not uploading any new packages *g*
As it has been said earlier, the machines are back, but just need to
catch up. So just waiting might be the easiest thing to do.
Greetings
Martin
Hi Ingo,
On Saturday, 12 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 02:06:24PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> > As it has been said earlier, the machines are back, but just need to
> > catch up. So just waiting might be the easiest thing to do.
>
> More mach
Hi Peter,
On Monday, 14 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> jwhois (3.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Updated default configuration.
> (Closes: Bug#201603, #202192, #203022, #208573, #210631, #210811,
> Bug#211690, #212182, #212184, #212418, #212607, #212608,
> Bug#21329
Hi Ingo,
On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:37:31PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > > >The s390 porting team can perfectly well do what the hurd-i386 porting
> > > >team does: build them themselves. I mean, umm, you don't have to be
> > > >hooked into w-b to
Hi Adrian,
On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> The timeline for another failed release date:
> - August 2nd 2004: announcement
> - August 8th 2004: "Official security support for sarge begins"
> - September 15th 2004: announced release date
>
> The milestone that included the start of the offic
Hi Pierre,
On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> Le Mardi 15 Mars 2005 16:15, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit :
Full ACK on the whole mail.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Pasi,
On Friday, 18 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> Changes:
> valknut (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* New upstream release (Closes: #289643, #269952, #265284, #270096,
> #286234)
is there any reason for not giving some more explanation, when closing
bugs with urgency=high and only list
Hi Christoph,
On Friday, 11 Nov 2005, you wrote:
> Maybe lintian could detect if if was running on stable when it should
> be on unstable, and warn the user. I'm not sure how to do this, since
> there are legitimate uses on stable where you wouldn't want to get the
> warning.
it could parse the
Hi José,
how about sending this to Frontdesk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or MIA,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of spamming debian-devel with that?
Greetings
Martin
> Hi, Stephen.
>
> Having sent you e-mails with my last answers to the Tasks&Skills
> stage of the NM process on 2005/10/05, and having
Hi AJ,
On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
> Things I did today:
>
> 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh).
>
> Coincidence? You decide.
>
> URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts
Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely n
Hi Anthony,
On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
> > > Things I did today:
> > > 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh).
&g
Hi Marc,
On Sunday, 29 Jan 2006, you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've done the bug report #350119 last week (providing a patch) and just
> seen that this patch fixes #342008. Is it a way to 'link' them in the
> BTS? (as i'm not a DD)
mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and sent in the body:
merge 350119 3420
Hi Daniel,
On Monday, 06 Feb 2006, you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:30:01PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > But that doesn't mean that we can issue an update to a stable package.
> >
> > Currently they are mainly done for security purposes -- but stable updates
> > should not be confined t
Hi,
[ CC'ing debian-devel, as more people might catch it up there ]
On Thursday, 02 Mar 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to accept exim4_4.50-8sarge1 into volatile. This version is
> already accepted into the next point release, and I would put the
> binary-idential packages into v
Hi Andi,
On Sunday, 05 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> The plan is to make s-p-u such a place, but until it happens, I think
> volatile can have such packages as an exception, if the bug is severe
> enough.
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, no
Hi Soumyadip,
On Thursday, 27 Jan 2005, Soumyadip Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However I couldn't find any documentation on how to setup buildds. Can
> anyone please provide pointers
http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/
or
http://people.debian.org/~aba/buildd/
Greetings
Martin
--
The human
Hi Marco,
On Sunday, 30 Jan 2005, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 30, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > installing udev results in X not able to start.
> RTFM README.Debian.
>
As written, i installed sarge via linux26, th
Hi Pasi,
On Saturday, 19 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> Kirjoitit viestissäsi (lähetysaika lauantai, 19. maaliskuuta 2005 02:53):
> > On Friday, 18 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> > > Changes:
> > > valknut (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=high
> > > .
> > >* New upstream release (Closes: #289643, #269952, #26528
Hi Martin,
On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The questions below were posted at long time in the DDTP-Coors list, but
> > weren't replied :(((
> >
> > IMHO the ddts code needs a revision to correct bugs, I am wrong? This
> > revision is possible? I can help.
>
Hi all,
On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2005 4:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS
> > tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than
&
Hi all,
On Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005, I wrote:
> I registered a alioth project today, which hopefully will be aprooved
> soon.
FYI project approoved.
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/ddtp/ is our friend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hi Otavio,
On Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005, you wrote:
>
> I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we
oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different
for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like
to use even another version control sy
Hi,
On Tuesday, 07 Jun 2005, you wrote:
> Feel free to add some new items or add (hopefully new) information to the
> ones I list below:
>
- A lot of programms use tcpwrapper which I appreciate a lot. However,
it is quite often not too easy to find out what to write in
hosts.allow to allow
Hi Josselin,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:56:52AM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm orphaning the following packages. I'm no longer interested in
> maintaining them unless the project pays me for it.
>
> * h5utils
> * hdf5 - very useful tool for finding ICEs in
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
> >> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
> >> and there may be
On Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 21:23:48 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to "apt-get update" from a testing mirro today but apt told me?
> W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
> A70DAF536070D3A1
>
> OK, maybe a new key, let's look at debian-archive-keyring:
> gpg
On Wed Nov 29, 2006 at 16:40:30 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:28:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If you are maintainer of a non-free-package falling into this category (i.e.
> > after careful review of the license that it can be autobuild), please:
>
> Are you
Hi,
as the open-iscsi interface in kernel 2.6.18 changed we will need a newer
version of open-iscsi in testing as soon as 2.6.18 hit testing. I
recently NMUed open-iscsi to close two RC bugs and needed to use a new
major upstream version, to get it proper working with kernel 2.6.18. I
therefor upl
Hi,
On Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 19:01:31 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
> amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
>
> I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
> there any x86 autobuild
Hi Martijn,
On Friday, 24 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you are
> > running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check
> > or update them.
>
> Qui
Hi Andi,
On Wednesday, 10 May 2006, you wrote:
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
to know, how other architectu
Hi Michael,
On Friday, 19 May 2006, you wrote:
> > > As a final note, did anyone from Debian who usually examines licences
> > > actually examine this one?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I take it you were too busy to elaborate on this when you wrote this
> email. So you will probably give us the name of thi
Hi AJ,
On Monday, 22 May 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:14:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Right, but again, why bringing the package with a bad license into the
> > archive first?
>
> Because non-fr
Hi Florian,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mario Holbe:
>
> > We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
> > no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
> > automatically override even
Hi Drew,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:28:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As I understand it, buildds (or is it a separate set of servers?) are
> now autocompiling packages in experimental. Where are the logs for
> these builds?
http://experimental.debian.net
--
To UNSUBS
Hi Piotr,
On Friday, 19 Aug 2005, you wrote:
> I don't like these reports. They should be available at the web only. Could
> anybody turn off the mailing? I would like to see the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] only for really important messages.
bash:# man procmail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Hi Piotr,
On Friday, 19 Aug 2005, you wrote:
> On Friday 19 of August 2005 17:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > On Friday, 19 Aug 2005, you wrote:
> > > I don't like these reports. They should be available at the web only.
> > > Coul
Hi Roberto,
On Friday, 19 Aug 2005, you wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:25:07AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The following packages have been orphaned:
>
> >mindterm (#323802), orphaned today
> > Description: java ssh client that can be used as a web applet
> >
>
>
> C
Hi,
as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could
find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org online.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nathanael,
On Saturday, 08 Oct 2005, you wrote:
> Anyone working on assembling the information for this?
>
> It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because
> nobody bothered to collect the information.
do you mean i*3*86 or ia-32?
i*3*86 died already before sarge releas
ked debian/copyright,
> that pointed me to http://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=dak, in which I did
> not find anything either. Are there more recent sources available to
> non-DDs?
http://ftp-master.debian.org/bzr/
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team M
atever might be a good idea. Quite a big number of mails to the
debian-devel mailing list are ITPs.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel
active smoke signs from him was IIRC around XMAS,
though i could contact his parents if needed.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel
an-infrastructure-announce/2008/03/msg3.html
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870
> > as laid out in http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r3/ et al.
>
> It doesn't hurt to ask however. Ubuntu is also rushing a last-minute
> update in hardy to avoid this problem.
I don't see anything which warrants a stable upload here.
Greetings
Martin
--
ult for
not sending a mail to d-i-a, sorry for that.
If we would had got a more timely announcement from the hoster, i would
had surely send a mail to d-i-a.
If you think we (DSA) are doing a bad job, please feel free to attand
DSA BoF on DC9 and lets talk about it there.
Greetings
Martin
--
Marti
Hi,
On Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 15:22:44 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > If you think we (DSA) are doing a bad job, please feel free to attand
> > DSA BoF on DC9 and lets talk about it there.
>
> That implies to me that this is the only way to discuss
operations, and
> not #-devel topic.
we understood that now. EOD, PLEASE! I also already appologized for it.
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc -
Hi,
On Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 13:01:45 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:21PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> > wrote:
> >> I thought that the 2007 key was (based on [1]) supposed to be available
> >> early in January and availa
Hi,
On Sat Jan 20, 2007 at 13:51:49 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stable will be signed by both, online and offline key. Also every point
> > release will be signed by both keys.
> >
> > Greetings
&
Hi,
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
> > > amd64, ther
Hi,
On Thu Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35 +, James Troup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Summary
> ===
>
> I've done some work in dak to improve the binary upload restrictions
> that are currently in place to hopefully reduce some of the collateral
>
Hi,
On Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 07:15:06 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The problem is fixed in sarge-proposed-update with glibc version
> 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 since the end of November.
> I would like to know if the stable release team is planning to do
> something to update the glibc in Sarge.
Yes
Hi,
On Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 11:57:14 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:34:39AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > as Debian gets more and more accounts it is only natural that we have
> > more and more unused accounts. People get MIA, find different interests
> >
Hi,
>
> I request an adopter for the devscripts package. I have had very
> little time over recent months (years, even), and this package really
> demands far more active maintenance than I am able to give it.
I would be willing to addopt that package, but team maintainance would
be very much
Hi,
I am a bit irritated by the following sentence in README.Debian-source:
| It's completely out of date anyway.
Could you please explain?
Greetings
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Hi,
On Sun Apr 01, 2007 at 11:37:06 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andreas Barth:
>
> > For t-p-u, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ah, thanks. Pretty obvious in retrospect.
>
> > For proposed-updates, I fear the mails are only sent upon approval,
> > but I'm not sure (it would be debian-changes@list
Hi,
On Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 17:29:48 -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any news on the merkel.debian.org downtime? This also stalls
> apt-listbugs for a while on every package upgrade attempt. I tried
> searching the list archives for d-d and d-d-a, but saw nothing about
> it.
Yes, m
Hi,
On Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 01:08:32 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> > Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got
> > this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed?
>
> Not really; it's just the continuing
Hi,
as a QA effort the whole archive was rebuilt yesterday to catch
build-failures, whether a package can be build twice in a row (unpack,
build, clean, build). We found about 400 packages not having a sane
clean target.
To cite
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrule
Hi,
On Wed May 16, 2007 at 10:11:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:10:44AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > as a QA effort the whole archive was rebuilt yesterday to catch
> > build-failures, whether a package can be build twice in a row (un
Hi,
On Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 12:59:14 +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
> I'd like to file a wishlist bug on people who file FTBFS bugs.
>
> It would be nice if you checked first whether there's a package
> pending in NEW or incoming and see if that might resolve the issue
> already.
This could be realiz
Hi,
On Sat Jun 02, 2007 at 11:18:00 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11037 March 1977, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> > This could be realized by patching helena[1], eg. to produce a RSS like
> > output, so an automated parsing of PackageName and PackageVersion in NEW
> &g
Hi,
for the current experimental buildd network we have a need of arm
machines. The current machine we have is maintained by Kenshi Muto and
works perfect, but we currently try to set up some redundancy on
machines running for our network.
So if you have a machine which meets the follwing criteri
oes or at least it may.
rsync keyring.debian.org::keyrings/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
can be synced publicly
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.
h static kernels. Would that be a
problem for OpenAFS?
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870
GPG Fingerprin
Hi,
On Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 17:46:56 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> Does this mean anything with regards to how backports will operate? I'm
> just curious, as you probably know from my past posts that I'm quite
> interested in stable release updates beyond simple security updates...
As member of the S
Hi,
On Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 12:54:41 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:34:34AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > (Please CC me on replies; thanks.)
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:58:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >
> > > packages.debian.org was finally u
Hi,
On Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 20:41:51 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
>
> This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
created as RT#171
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 22:41:16 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> since today I noticed the above mail header. Could one enlight me
> what p-bank is? I can't find something similar in the pkg databse.
p-bank means policy bank. that can also be found in the debian package.
en
Hi,
On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 23:09:38 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
> Martin Zobel-Helas told:
>
> [...]
> > p-bank means policy bank. that can also be found in the debian package.
>
> In which one?
amavisd-new.
The fol
Hi,
On Wed Sep 12, 2007 at 14:39:09 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Non-free material is being included in main for the benefit of *precisely
> > zero*
> > users. There's no two ways about this: this is a Social Contract violation.
>
> Oh well, the kernel team just lost its trust, which means
Hi Piotr,
On Tue Sep 25, 2007 at 14:10:58 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> The Debian volatile archive is the place for packages that expires
> before new Debian release. The description perfectly fits for my
> package libdatetime-timezone-perl.
>
> I prepared a few weeks ago new releases for sar
Hi,
On Tue Sep 25, 2007 at 14:55:47 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Ah... Do you mean this mail?
>
> > am I missing something completely here?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/packages$ diff -rNu
> > libdatetime-timezone-perl-0.42-before-dv/ > libdatetime-timezone-perl-0.42
> > | diffstat
>
Hi,
On Tue Sep 25, 2007 at 17:36:03 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> It is simple analogy for tzdata package. You should also ask, why the
> tzdata package has so many changes and why don't simply update only
> one timezone?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% diff -rNu tzdata-2007b tzdata-2007f | diffstat
af
Hi,
On Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 00:20:10 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> You made a subtle mistake. You checked the source package for tzdata
> and the changes are really small. Then you checked the differences for
> libdatetime-timezone-perl package, but this source package is already
> compiled. Yo
Hi,
On Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 14:46:16 +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> 2007/9/26, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Accepted now.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> > For the future: i would have been much easier, if you would have said:
> > be warned,
Hi,
On Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 19:36:49 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
> domain refuses to accept my mail.
>
> : host
> mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
> invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS
Hi,
On Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 01:18:27 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when writing scripts to manage Debian repository, many people
> including me use Python. Is there some "official" way of doing it? It
> seems to me everyone is writing his own parsers. I know about of at
> least 5 differen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martin Zobel-Helas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: isns
Version : 2.1-01
Upstream Author : Nishan Systems, Inc
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxisns
* License : BSD
Programming Lang:
Hi,
i would like to propose that we change /etc/debian_version with
beginning of lenny to also show which revision of a release is
installed.
Rational: We do regular updates to stable releases (called point
releases) from time to time but you can't tell from installed files
which revision (point
ut dig and host are both not essential packages, so this still has
> > > to go to the postinst.
> >
> > Well, this could be solved by a pre-depends on dnsutils |
> > bind9-host. Pre-depends are often frowned upon, what do others think
> > of this for this case?
&
able enough, we can see
if we can roll out it to all buildds.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870
GPG Fingerprint:
mats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)". Have you updated your own
> > > packages already?
> >
> > Why should I?
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#WhyshouldIconvertmypackageto3.0.28quilt.29format.3F
This wiki page still misses a "D
p 2.6.32 kernels, which makes eg. security support much easier.
Greetings
Martin
PS: My personal opinion? I would really like to see octeon support for
Debian Squeeze... ;-)
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Lis
caused that problem, but we will see There will be a further
downtime when the replacement DIMMs arrive.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f8
how any updates at all.
you should read debian-devel-announce an it's follow-ups on this list.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/03/msg00010.html
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Lis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martin Zobel-Helas"
Owner: "Martin Zobel-Helas"
* Package name: libmath-polygon-perl Version : 1.01 Upstream
Author : Mark Overmeer * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-
Polygon/ * License
copied over frequently to
http://git.debian.org/?p=mirror/DMUP.git;a=summary (gitweb frontend).
Cheers,
Martin
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/04/msg00016.html
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer |
+ the Debian project.
2. If the offender does not file for an appeal within the
designated time frame the account is terminated.
3. The offender is prohibited from registering as a Debian
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System
t; Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 0 (new: 0)
> Total number of packages requested help for: 0 (new: 0)
>
> Please refer to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more information.
I disabled that cronjob for now, it misses the bts2ldap part on quantz.
Cheers
Mar
ments) will that key replacement really
happen? Thus CCing keyring maintainers.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64
bian.net/deps/dep8
^
Cheers
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B |
GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
be make this a GSoC2011 project?
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B |
GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
-
x27;s even special as it's a mirror
> that's synced pretty early.
our automatism though check if ftp.d.o is to be shutdown for reboot and
itself points ftp.d.o to another host in the mirror network. So yes,
from time to time ftp.d.o does not point to kassia.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Ma
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
