Re: gpfs packages for a migration to Debian ?

On 07/22/2011 10:19 AM, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, Hi > I hope that this mailing list is the right one for that kind of questions. > > I am investigating the availability of packages for de IBM General > Parallel File System (GPFS) [1] for Debian. It seems that this kind of > distri

Re: Bug#636164: RFP: apt-clone -- ZFS integrated APT package handling utility

On 08/01/2011 09:31 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:38:13AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> * Package name: apt-clone >> Version : 0.7.9nexenta28 >> * URL : see below >> * License : CDDL > > You may want to run this by debian-legal. Last I

Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals

On 08/13/2011 09:59 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Neil McGovern , 2011-08-01, 22:07: >> As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened >> against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a >> conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues where >> ap

Re: forwarding bugs upstream - opt-in, delayed, automated

On 09/13/2011 03:14 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > - enable people to subscribe to bug traffic only if it matches specific > tags (the idea being of forwarding upstream only the traffic for > "confirmed" bugs) > > - add a DELAYED-like mechanism where upstream is notified of a bug only > if

Re: alternative dependency ordering - with respect of packages in main

On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! Hi > Policy is clear on packages in main aren't allowed to depend on > packages outside of main. Now in a fair amount of cases this has been > worked around by having the package outside of main as alternative > dependency and a packag

<    1   2   3   4