"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
I'm not sure your resignation was valid. Most important debian mechanisms
require a signature from a key in the keyring.
It is hard for anybody
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
--
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wait. Ignore my previous post. I had forgotten that the resignation post was
indeed signed. It might howeve
Jérôme Marant said:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jérôme Marant schrieb:
> Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master?
No.
Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :)
Not good. What is missing to get this fixed?
Well There are two mi
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Example: (/etc/apt/sources.list)
deb http://ftp.en.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EM
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:46:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
You have failed to detail any particular difficulty that this causes,
I'm pretty sure I saw him do this already, by noting that it increases the
n
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't complain, I'll just send a friendly assassin to your house :-)
A friendly assasin? Is that the type that comes in, talks with you for a
while, and eventually offers you a poisioned beer?
--
To UNSUBS
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Furthermore, /dev/shm is a mount point with a _very_ specific function.
It's a bad idea to start using it for something else.
Reality check: packages have been using it for a long time and the world
has not fallen yet
"Michael Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Vogt]
> Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing a new upload that adds the 2006
> archive key to the default keyring.
Sounds good. Will this aut
"Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debconf
debconf-english
debconf-i18n
These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
not subject to the circular dependency postinst ordering problems afaik.
Well
"Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much
"Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Chad Walstrom:
I'm trying to package up tex2page and noticed that there is no virtual
package for scheme-interpreter. I would like to specify in the
"Depends:" that some sort of scheme-interpreter is required inst
"Stuart Yeates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the USA copyright can be enforced even on laws:
http://www.constructionweblinks.com/Resources/Industry_Reports__Newsletters/May_17_2004/supreme.html
I'm assuming that the legislation in question included the code
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not know what GR's are currently open (despite mails
on -announce about them), asnd do not know how to simply look it up
on vote.debian.org, the subject matter is irrelevent to you anyway.
Sorry to change the topic, but looking at some of the manpages in the
"manpages" package,
and some of the pages in the "manpages-dev" causes me no notice some pages
that look like they probably should be in a different package.
ld-linux(8)
ld-linux.so(8)
These probably belong in libc6 which ap
"Philip Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have built up a fine-grained mirroring script over time which not only
selects the architecture but also the version (stable, testing etc) to be
mirrored. Unfortunately this script will require ftp/http access
to ..
"Sergio Callegari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have this directory on an Ubuntu system and it seems to be present
on recent Debian systems too...
It is on tmpfs.
Can anybody tell me what is its purpose (as many other distros don't
have it) and when it gets moun
"MJ Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MFT is broken by design. No-one should expect to remote control other
people's mail clients. All one can do is ask and if you want to ask in
the headers, fine, but don't go flaming when it gets lost in the noise.
All of From
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, not for handling packages the stable
release manager denys to take into a stable release.
I've not followed this bug but AIUI SRM has approved the package for the
next point release.
If the bug i
"Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:42:12PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote:
I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.
Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.
Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overlo
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.
"Rene Engelhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enforcing this policy to existing font packages is not in the top
priority of the team.
What is a policy useful for when most packages are not following it? I
think if there's a sane policy people should have to mi
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, will use that nexty time. I don't know if native speaker realise
this, because many non-native speaker seem to have a fluent english, but
there
are times when the right words just don't come, and you are graspin
The upstream folks are planning to split cogito and git into two separate
packages. I requested (and they seemed to agree) that they change the
package name from git to something else before then. Hopefully they'll
see the light and try to play nice with the rest of the world.
Hmm... It look
What is interesting is that this worm will not send to addresses that
contain:
berkeley
bugs
bsd
fsf.
gnu
kernel
linux
mozilla
unix
the.bat
root
sendmail
listserv
So it looks like the worm tries to avoid open source or free software sites.
The worm contains may other no-sends, in categogories l
"Goswin von Brederlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
c
"Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No problem at all. Especially with gmane.org around. I used to
subscribe to dozens of mailing lists, but now I can just browse
all of them as newsgroups.
I agree, I use Gm
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian must decide whether it wants to ship BLOBs with licensing which
> technically does not permit
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depend
"Jeremy Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
Ok, this is a good argument.
I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
Some people think it would be a nice idea, BUT it can be also a problem
because so
"Frans Pop" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote:
I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable,
testing or unstable should be self-contained.
For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as
it
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the late
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> I'm surprised that there would be a
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
a bug.
alsa-utils should de
"Rogério Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
I think that this may be interesting to anybody that has to work with
computers that are not the latest/more recent as most people in richer
countries seem to have.
It seems to be that a good amount of peopl
"Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, version 3.7.2.0 is neither in unstable nor at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Both only have version 3.7.1.0. How comes that the PTS has a newer
version
th
"Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before
the
policy package actually hits the mirrors.
There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the
mirrors are updated when
"Lionel Elie Mamane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get source ${PACKAGE}
cp -R ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
cd ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}
# hack away
cd ..
diff --recursive -u ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} > d
"Matt Taggart and others" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple
different
binary targets on the same system, for
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why?
"Daniel Ruoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed a
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived a
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a "red team attack".
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because t
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/7/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sure. SPI owns many of the machines that Debian owns. If any o
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"):
I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks
like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions
on d-l?
Actually, I thi
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: googleearth-package
Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : (native packag
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I agree that it's ok to trust installer source that they will not
install a backdoor into your system.
However, chances that they will write to directories that should be under
control of package manager, o
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith wrote:
Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
system. Normally the main reason why a d
"Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
In cases where a security bug is being fixed, you usually try to
upload the package as soon as possible. If your sponsor is on
We did
"Petr Vandrovec" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since this seems to have been an intentional behavior change by
upstream to better align with a published standard, I'm uninclined to
fight it, and think our best response is to update our utilities to
include the --wildcards option, with
"Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working
> anymo
"Bastian Venthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Lemmen wrote:
standard method. you will however find out that the size of all diffs
together is already less than the size of the regular packages file.
Yeah, looking at the average filesize of a diff compa
"Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't quite grok how I can make erfit be the default bootloader
> without access to MacOSX command-line to 'bless', I hope I can find
> out as I delve deeper.
You can't. Intel Mac blessing is different to traditio
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 195752 important
thanks
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:43:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
But yeah, I'm not in an official position to say, but if this
isn't considered a "critical" or at least "grave"
"Baruch Even" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor
www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be
reached; and lists.debia
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Allombert writes ("Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5"):
Here the list of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Didn't we already have the conversation where we explained t
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be
considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see you have not fully followed through on reading policy
here:
,[ § 7.2 ]
| In case of circular dependencies, since installation or removal
order
| honoring the dependency order can't be established, dependency loops
|
"Daniel Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I intend to do an update-menu thing that calls 'fburn --gui',
which makes for a somewhat friendly interface from a window manager
menu or icon. Also it doesn't just blast out the image and hope it's
okay; unle
How about if it meets the folowing critieria:
1. it has been in testing for 10 days (been in sid at least 20 days)
2. the version is sid is the same as in testing (the maintainer has not
found problems in the ten days since it entered testing)
3. and has no RC bugs (no rc bugs reported in the te
Dan Jacobson wrote:
One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use
our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links.
Hmmm, does init respect policy-rc.d? If so, it'd be fairly easy to do it
that way...
How many rc.d managers are in Debian anyway?
p
Basically this is a postscript file that is used more or less as a shared
library. It is debians policy to have shared libraies used by more thasn one
debian program to be seperated out into its own package, and linked against.
That is the goal of this. Terry is mainly asking if packaging this as
block 1234 with 1235 1236
--http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2005/08/12?seemore=y#2005-08-12-postdc5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure it will be documented, however it is a new feature and they have
not had time to update the doumentation. In fact they probably wanted to
leave it undocumented temporarally allowing those who knew about it to make
sure it was working before making it publicly known.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
"Bastian Venthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: quake3
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : ID-Software
* URL : http://www.idsoftware.com/
* License
Also you need to have a more reliable upstream. ID is not suitable as they
will not release security updates, fixes, etc in a timely manner.I would
very strongy advise against5 being the upstream yourself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Wait, if a reliable upstream wrt timely security fixes is
a recommendation or requirement, we might have to get of a *fair*
share of the archive... and that's not only the unmaintained
software!
Well i meant both security and other updates. In the case where no better
upstream exists, it is a
"Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you misunderstood me here. The limit is a upper limit, not a
lower limit.
Perhaps i'm wrong but let me pull up the original message. ...
- the release architecture must have N+1 buildds where N is
T free. If it is not free, it has failed.
--
If Debian is not free, it has failed. - Joe Smith
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, i386 does not make the cut according to the vancouver
prospect due to the number of buildds required. So are we left with 0
archs in etch? :) That will certainly speed up the release.
LOL.
Release NOW! Release now, damnit!
I think it will be our fastest and smoothest release ever.
Ok, I know just about nothing about this.
I currently have 2.6 kernel, hotplug, and udev.
If I replace hotplug with coldplug, everything should still work barring
unexpected bugs?
(Once the archive is updated of course, so that udev does not require
hotplug, and coldplug is actually included)
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Human error, or poluted chroot/compilation env is more likely to happen
on the developper machine than in a buildd. Maybe this has already been
discussed once, but I think that binary uploaded packages (except the
b
parse error.
1. Yavor Doganov says something.
2. Wouter Verhelst: Yeah. _We_ know.
3. Yavor Doganov: Is suddenly "sad" that Wouter (seems to) agree(s).
WTF?
I assume that by 'preching to the choir' Wouter meant: the people you are
trying to convince already believe in what you are saying.
Have we updated the GPL in debian with the FSF new address?
As the address is for informational purposes the change is legally a no-op,
and should be performed for convince. (Unless of course somebody objects to
effectively changing a non-normative part of their license.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
- Original Message -
From: "Henning Makholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Bug#328053: configure on install problem: cannot add user
while name_regex don't match username "sympa"
Scripsit
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The same is true for other RPC servers. It's the libc that restricts the
port
numbers (look at glibc-2.3.5/sunrpc/bindrsvprt.c, currently, it seems
it's port = (PID % 424) + 600). And, as I've said,
"Mark Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In an ideal world dynamic services would have a range of ports reserved
for them. We're quite a way away from an ideal world here.
There are ports for that.
All ports above 49151 are designated for local (i.e. client) or
"Thomas Petazzoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The rules in english are understandable. I would suggest the following
changes though:
Use 'capture' instead of take when refering to taking an oppenent's pawn.
Change 'do a take' to 'capture'.
Change 'taken out o
"martin f krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please choose a different name
You should really have suggested something.
I'm not sure, but perhaps 'hibernate-java' migh work.
Sounds like a java port of the current hibernate utility though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
I wonder why nobody did implement that feature before. I imagine
(without knowing much about APT's internals), the pseudocode would look
like that:
- install command gets the list
- if the package does not exist in the cache and the given string is a
file, then:
- read the metadata of this pa
"Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
would it not be simpler to have have apt just ask dpkg what the
dependencies of the passed .deb are and then install the dependencies
(and
their dependecies) and then just pass the deb directly to dpkg?
Hehe, it wa
"Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 21:34, Daniel Burrows wrote:
No, because people like to turn off the installation of
recommendations
Or yes, because it offers more flexibility to people who have a basic idea
of what they ar
"Miles Bader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adept is a package manager for KDE developed by Peter Rockai on top of
the libapt-front library[1]. It supports debtags natively, it's the
first application based on libapt-front,
"Josselin Mouette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The documentation mentions that some compilers might need to be
executed as :
``CC=c89 CFLAGS=-O2 LIBS=-lposix ./configure''
But there is no posix library as far as I can make out in Debian, so
that won't do.
Y
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
Hmm... Doesn't a resignation require a message signed with a key on the
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
And there I thought we'd use whatever we like until wig&pen lands, which
will have native patch support.
What's the status of that? Is my assumption bad?
Not completely, I'm following the discussion closely
"Charles Plessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:35:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
Unless the pdf is exceptionally complicated, it's not all that
difficult to resurect LaTeX that does a similar job; it'd probably be
ideal to do this a
"Sebastian Pipping" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
My understanding is that it is possible to have binary-only packages in
non-free,
although I really don't know an
"David Paleino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:52 -0300
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
As I said, for APT, the order has meaning _always_.
apt-get install foo bar
Is completely different of
apt-get install bar f
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
So you do something like:
apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
[Though it probably should be an easier option, it is possible to do.]
Well, this
"Jonathan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I was not sure if the image for Debian 4.0 downloaded completely. This is
why I feel >obliged to order it. I will be using Debian for GrADS and for
compiling FORTRAN >code. Can I get some recommendations f
"Michael Biebl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess Joss is right here. triggers tell you *if* something has changed
>(in a subdirectory), but not *what*.
Remember, that we have to call
gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/$subdir
for the directory that has c
"Joerg Jaspert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
c.) We can host an own archive for it under control of ftpmaster.
[snip]
So the way to go for us seems to be c.), hosting the archive ourself
(somewhere below data.debian.org probably).
[snip]
A data.d.o would presumably be running on a debian
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Nikita Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080626 11:51]:
To fix #486693, I need to apply a patch that changes #define'd macro in
an
exported library header.
The pattern is:
extern int foo(char *param1, int param2
"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
THANK YOU !
So far I only had FUDs about: 'no this is impossible, 'this is not the
right way'. Thanks for taking the time to answer in detail, this much
more supportive. I finally understood the previous aggressive answers,
I was simply looking at
"Marvin Renich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 20:45]:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I mean the pending-write case is the most obvious. But what about
>> resolver
>> caches, VPNs and the like?
>
> What
"Manoj Srivastava" wrote:
Virt-what is more accurate than Imvirt, version 1.0 can tell the
difference between Xen Dom0 and DomU. The new version (1.1, released
on 23 july 2009) can tell the difference between QEMU and KVM, and can
tell if you are running inside a Xen fullvirt guest.
Th
"Piotr Ożarowski" wrote in message
news:20091203235820.gf6...@piotro.eu...
Right now we're working on updating the Debian Python Policy. Once we'll
be happy with the first set of patches, we'll send them to debian-python
mailing list. I don't see a reason to make it public right now as it's
si
I suspect Patrick might be worried about a scenario like the following.
Lets assume there is a package Foo that depends on and uses ucf. Further the
package is the only one ucing UCF on the system.
At some point the admin decides to remove Foo. Since there are no other
packages that use ucf o
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
