(the one that has been removed from testing).
There are other problems with the 2.2.0 version such as #261892 which
effectively cripples the network stack.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6.7) shows that
the use of the -e switch is still present.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:10:20PM +0200, Tobias Wolter wrote:
> I am sole user of two boxen..
> It's just the question whether users have an average of 10 running
> boxen or not.
I do.
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when the whole world is trying it's be
of 6 billion
(60) some time ago. Unless there was some mass death of ~ 3
billion people since then, I would think it was still significantly
above the 3 billion you reference. Either way it is certainly below 1
trillion.
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when the whole world
gins. As could the /usr/lib/netscape/plugins
directory.
I'm sure that there are many directories that are meaningless to several
users.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
ainer could be the
adoption of one of the WNPP packages (assuming there are any in line
with the applicants skills).
However, the DAM approval process needs serious review. Keeping anyone
in awaiting DAM approval for more than 60 days without any kind of
notice or update is quite frankly rude and
x27;t provide still exists.
Fine so call it task-gnu-preferred.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
it doesn't appear that it supports either the
older H.323 or new SIP standards. This is probably why there is a lack
of interest in it.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
el just can adapt
to, such as system partitions on a firewire device (sbp2 can't be built
into the kernel TMK).
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
the application was
approved by AM and DAM became the holdup. You have still been waiting
longer, but could still have another 290 days to go (before a new
record).
So, who does DAM report to? Who can do something about this extremely
long wait?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a lo
both times. You have amazing
patience if you haven't bitched about this before. Your situation makes
this even more depressing. Here I thought 470 was the current top end,
now I find that I may as well not get worked up about it until I've been
waiting for nearly 2 years. Something h
an be found at:
http://asgardsrealm.net/~jcollins/debs/
Note: jabber-jit is in need of a manpage, but otherwise passes all
Lintian checks.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
ugs" found in our packages? I'm not
saying that all architectures shouldn't be supported equally. I just
don't have access to either of the above architectures to correct
problems found in my packages.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
currently a bug report for Jabber concerning a segfault on the arm
architecture, I can not replicate the problem and thus can not resolve
it.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:52:38PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> >> me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and
&
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:23:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:08:40PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > Yes, I do not have access to them for testing or debugging. I have
> > access to only x86 machines currently. Thus, I can not adequately
&g
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:25:57PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 19:34, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > So, are you volunteering to help those of us without access to
> > either of the above architectures with "bugs" found in our packages?
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:31:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:23:30PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > Now you're assuming that I have access to the Debian machines. TMK,
> > these machines are *not* public access machines, but instead are
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:46:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:45:01AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >...
> > > There are at least two ways how you can get an account on a machine in
> > > such a situation:
> > > - ask the De
d, etc...). It's what I've done with the Jabber bug reports
that only affect the woody release.
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when the whole world is trying it's best night
and day to make you everybody else is to fight the hardest battle any
human being will fight. -- E.E. Cummings
seen as a bad thing. Thus, I
figured I'd ask here for comments and suggestions on how to handle this
type of situation.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
#x27;t notice
(as far as the backend changes). I'd just like to know if anything I'm
planning is frowned upon or can be done better.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:46:43AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > The old DB works fine after the upgrade against it. The questions
> > are. Whether removing the configuration files (/etc/moviemate) is a
> > taboo, even though the c
ting infrastructure for another project. This could in some
ways result in something of a competition for developers between the two
projects, thus resulting in each being something less than they could
have been as one.
--
Jamin W. Collins
s broken.
That's a pretty big *if*, and as I've indicated above the applicants
don't seem to be informed or contacted.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:22:01PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:34:06PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:09:15PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > I disagree; if the applicant knows why they are being delayed, the
lcome,
feedback on your application? I'm not asking whether you would clamor
for updates, but whether receiving them would be a problem for you?
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
be done under the current system doesn't mean that
the current system isn't broken or in need of improvement. Some of us
feel it can be done _better_.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
s "You
> like it therefore you should contribute".
I didn't take it that way, the statement seemed rather clear that it was
a matter of liking the project and wanting to contribute to it, not a
matter of feeling like one should.
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself wh
his matter would be most appreciated.
I've sent a request to debian-admin, but have heard nothing back from
them.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
[1] - http://bugs
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd
> > really like to put the ARM specific bug[1] filed against the Jabber
> &g
e enough. Shouldn't need
to change any config files for the test. Once it's running I'd simply
need an IP that I can connect to port 5222 on to send some tests.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
t have uploaded it as I understand) and doesn't appear to be
listed in the list of NM applicants. So, I'm assuming that there must
be a sponsor for the upload, but is this information kept anywhere?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with
usr/share should be capable of
being made read-only. Any runtime changing data for an application
should be under /var/lib. For more information the following link may
help:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-toc.html
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
> Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:26:14AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins a ?crit :
> >
> > Is this uploaded data recorded anywhere? In the MySQL database
> > perhaps? If so, the file names can be retrieved from there for
en covered to death already. There are a sufficient number
of respondents that see it as non-free. The RM's recent post indicates
that possibly the FSF has even come around to the idea that their
license is less than Free. Can we please move along now?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
es accessing each other (via "include") in another
> directory, without patching the application.
I'll forward Media Mate's packaging over to you.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
e new and the old they need to edit the old entry for an initrd
too.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> So, all mails sent to bugs with release-critical severities, including
> acknowledgements of control messages, will now be copied to a new
> list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice!
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but y
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:57:45PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
>
> Before you object to this rather 'rude' bughandling, please keep in
> mind that version 1.8.4 of snort, which is in stable, has 3 severe
> security exploits,
So, why hasn't a security update been re
rejected, and I tried to have 2.0.x installed in
> Stable, but ofcourse, you can't put a new upstream version in a
> released stable Debian.
Actually that's not true, as an example I refer you to SSH.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string toget
g has only DDs in it. I think people were suggesting
> > > > using the public keyservers. keyring.debian.org isn't a part of the
> > > > public key servers.
> > >
> > > That's the part of the system I was criticizing :)
> >
> > Not
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:16:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:35:17AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > Because there is no need for it to change.
>
> Err, why not,
What is the goal? To indicate that the e-mail signed came from someone
in
eping in mind my point 2) ?
Items 1-3 are already addressed with DD signatures on other individuals
keys on public key servers. Item 4 can be addressed with public key
servers too.
I'm not against Debian having another key ring, I simply don't see a
specific need for one, although Goswin di
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:07:00AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:04:08AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > Actually that's not true, as an example I refer you to SSH.
>
> A stunning example of what a terrible idea it is to do this.
Nev
it just as useful as I do.
Not I. I made a few attempts to use it in the beginning. After that I
decided that any and all installs I did from that point forward would
not run dselect.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
don't see why the two packages couldn't
use the same user. Why not check during installation to see if the user
account exists? If it does, use it. If not create it?
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I've seen
meantion of a few cases of developers maintaining their packages exactly
the way they want regardless of what other have to say.
You've always got the option of packaging a new kernel source package
without the excess.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
27;t consider
most of them to be extremely old, some of them were bought within the
last 6 months. In all cases using the 2.4 kernel on the first woody cd
has worked fine for installation.
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specifi
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Jamin W. Collins wrote [in a different order]:
>
> However, I'd prefer to have a "work in progress" blurb in
> README.Debian, partially to acknowledge that there are still some
> things to be smoothed
.
GET http://people.debian.org/~jcollins/
302 Found
Found
The document has moved http://people.debian.org/~jcollins/";>here.
Apache/1.3.26 Server at gluck.debian.org Port 80
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
d
on my packages have processed fine.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. --Aldous Huxley,
"Proper Studies", 1927
52 matches
Mail list logo
