Hello Rene, hello debian-devel,
Rene Engelhard schrieb am Sat 04. Feb, 10:23 (+0100):
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > # prep-deb-files from module-assistant creates the neccessary debian/
> > files
> > -kdist_config: prep-deb-files
> > +kdist_config: prep-deb-files patch
Hello Peter,
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Goswin von Brederlow]
>> Instead move the things in etc that need writing to other places:
>>
>> 1) link /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and create a dummy /proc/mounts on /
>>for when /proc isn't mounted (works with quota in current kern
Hi,
I've two problems with libslang2. The first is, the package libslang2
includes a patch that changes the behaviour of a function. But jed
expects the function behaviour as given in the original slang2 library.
I've reported this bug #369152, 80 days ago, but the maintainer does not
react. The u
Hello Alastair,
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've two problems with libslang2. The first is, the package libslang2
>> includes a patch that changes the behaviour of a function.
> I apologize for this; I&
Hello Jurij,
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:34:19PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>> /etc/rc0.d/S30urandom
>> /etc/rc0.d/S35networking
>> /etc/rc0.d/S36ifupdown
>> /etc/rc0.d/S37sendsigs (start action for this one is a no-op)
>> /etc/rc0.d/S48cryptdisks
>> /etc/
Hi,
the weekly send reports about release critical bugs to
debian-devel-announce have the Content-Type “unknown-8bit” set. Why this?
What is unknown for the encoding of the reports?
And why is the sender of the reports not a valid address?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jörg Sommer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xindy
Version : 2.2-beta2-1
Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xindy.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Pro
Hello Agustin,
Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:43:12PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
>> % export ACLOCAL=/bin/true AMTAR=/bin/true AUTOCONF=/bin/true \
>> AUTOHEADER=/bin/true AUTOMAKE=/bin/true MAKEINFO=/bin/true
>> % dpkg-buildpackage ...
>>
>> but this l
Hello Frank,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Here comes the usual comment: Please make sure to follow the Debian TeX
>>> Policy Draft in /usr/share/tex-common/.
>>
>> Xindy does not provide any tex, style or class files.
>
> Aren't there an
Hi,
I ever thought development packages classified by $NAME-dev belong to the
Section devel or libdevel, but
% apt-cache search -n .\*-dev\$ | sed 's/ -.*//' | \
xargs apt-cache show | grep \^Section: | sort -u
Section: admin
Section: comm
Section: contrib/libdevel
Section: devel
Section: doc
Hello Wouter,
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On 5/19/06, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why would they have to work with dash?
>
> If the difference in speed is indeed that insane, that's nice.
>
> I
Hello Gabor,
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 01:58:14AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>> Thus, it's bash's start-up which is the slow part, in the terms of
>> actual speed, bash is not that far behind.
>
> It would be interesting to compare something more complex
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>>> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
>>> script?
>>
>> Please go ahead. Anything rely
Hello Eduard,
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
> * Marco d'Itri [Sat, May 27 2006, 11:29:32AM]:
>
>> > > This is not a choice, every package which installs modules must run
>> > > depmod or they will not be available until a reboot.
>> > Yes. But no package (besides maybe module
Hallo Eduard,
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
> * Jörg Sommer [Sat, May 27 2006, 10:59:39PM]:
>
>> > No, they don't. At least my packages call it only if `uname -r` ==
>> > target version. When you drop the depmod run, and someone in
Hi,
should I set in package jed a conflict on a package jed-extra if
jed-extra enhances jed, but jed has changed its API and now jed-extra is
useless, i.e. it must be updated. jed-extra and jed can be installed at
the same time without harm, but jed-extra does not enhance jed anymore,
because it's
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/3/06, Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The package is compiled with kde libraries. Users demand to create one
>> > more binary package - compiled with qt only.
>> > I would like to use 'sim' package name for kde version an
Hallo Eric,
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>slrn
Fixed in experimental. I will soon provide a new version for unstable.
Bye, Jörg.
--
[dpkg] We are the apt. Resistance is futile. You will be packaged.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hello Raphael,
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>jed (U)
This is a SVN snapshot. There's no release of it. I fail to see how to
point to a changelog file in a SVN repository. How should I handle this
situation?
Bye,
Hi Simon,
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since dpkg 1.14.17, dpkg-buildpackage will define the environment
>> variables CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS and FFLAGS. The goal is to
>> be able to easily recompile packages with supplementary compilation flags
>> and to simplify th
Hi,
I've added [1] the CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to debian/rules of my package slrn
to enable hardening of the binaries.
ifeq (,$(findstring nohardening,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
# http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/01/msg6.html
CFLAGS += -fPIC -fPIE -fstack-protector -Wformat=2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jörg Sommer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: etcgit
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jo-guest/etcgit.git
* License :
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise schrieb am Tue 06. May, 18:05 (+0800):
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Package name: etcgit
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Hallo Bernhard,
Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080612 18:04]:
>> after many years of calling our CUPS package "cupsys" it has finally
>> be renamed to the proper upstream name "cups", including init scripts,
>> library packages, etc. This makes us
Hello,
Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:45:49 +0100 Nico Golde wrote:
>
>> Acpid doesn't load modules, it only listens to events and
>> executes programs.
>
> But the init-script does:
>
> # As the name says. If the kernel supports modules, it'll try to load
> # the
Hi Mark,
Mark Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fakechroot is a great idea for reducing the privileges needed for
> pbuilder builds, and thus simplifying developer builds of packages.
>
> So:
> * does anyone else find fakechroot useful and would benefit from the
> heavily-repaired version?
Hello Milan,
Milan P. Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:36:34PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>> > Milan P Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I'd like to discuss problem with regards to bug #372665.
>> > Why the racoon should be started in the rcS when e
Hello Milan,
Milan P. Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:05:53PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Milan P. Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > README says that in the /etc/rcS.d/ should go scripts which are
>> > executed once dur
Hi,
recently, I've installed a new system with a minimal configuration. Then
I've imported my old package selection with dpkg --set-selections and run
apt-get dselect-upgrade. This replaced the mawk package by the gawk
package and installed some X package at the same time.
>From dpkg.log:
2008-0
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:27:10AM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> recently, I've installed a new system with a minimal configuration. Then
>> I've imported my old package selection with dpkg --set-selections
Hello Pierre,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem here is somehow very generic, and that using a
> virtual package like proposed in the bug report (#500176) doesn't scale
> well. Especially for dns daemons. Packaging two of them myself (nsd3
> that is an authoritativ
Hi,
I'm a Debian Maintainer and would like to use the upload of packages via
scp. Is this service available for Debian Maintainers? Where do I have to
place my public ssh‐key?
Bye, Jörg.
--
Treffen sich zwei Funktionen.
Sagt die eine: „Verschwinde oder ich differenzier' dich!“
Erwidert die ander
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:15:35 +0300, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>> >> Many packages FTBFS (silently!) if an environment variable TAPE is
>>> >> set.
>>> Perhaps dpkg-buildpackage should unset TAPE...?
>
>> pbuilder and other tools alr
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> BTW, I also encountered a strange "bug" : sometimes the md5sums file
>> contains MD5 of files that are not shipped. This is printed as a warning
>> in my server. If MD5 will become a release goal, this sh
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a long time, the Debian pam package has been carrying a local patch to
> add support for Linux capabilities in pam_limits. While catching up on bug
> triage work on the package, I've come to the conclusion that this
> functionality is brok
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:45:12PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > For a long time, the Debian pam package has been carrying a local patch to
>> > add su
Hallo Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some tools use randomization to get out of worst case situations or
> general optimization. For example when you look for an optimal
> allocation of register usage you can do a search by picking a random
> register allocation and repe
Hello martin,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2026 +0100]:
>> how about sending mails from master.debian.org with either
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> I couldn't sign those messages.
Give mutt a new sen
Hello,
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 02, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I finally got through the test builds of all the source packages in sid for
>> i386 using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 on a dual core machine. The results as
>> before are at http://people.debia
Hi Petter,
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last few days I have made an effort to fix a few bugs in the boot
> system. The changes need some testing, as I do not have all the
> affected hardware to test on. I've tested the changes in qemu, but
> that do not test some of the
Hallo Petter,
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Kurt Roeckx]
>> Why is it using -18? Please change that to SIGCONT, it depends on the
>> arch what the value should be. See signal(7), which even mentions that
>> that is different for ppc/i386.
>
> Historical reasons and because t
Hi Hamish,
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:43:35AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Do you know how many .desktop files in Debian use the categories
>> Electronics or Engineering? If there are not enough to nicely populate a
>> menu, it may be better to patch
Hi,
I have the bug report #489917 that complains that Jed can't handle
64‐bit kernel structures. In this special case, the stat() return with
EOVERFLOW Value too large to be stored in data type. Jed was compiled for
a 32‐bit kernel and is run with a 64‐bit kernel. The error can be fixed
by compili
Hi Manoj, Hi debian-devel,
Manoj Srivastava hat am Fri 20. Feb, 12:04 (-0600) geschrieben:
> On Fri, Feb 20 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
> > I'm packaging etcgit [1], a system to manage configuration files in /etc
> > with git, similar to etckeeper. Etcgit tracks the
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava hat am Fri 20. Feb, 12:04 (-0600) geschrieben:
>>> On Fri, Feb 20 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm packaging etcgit [1], a system to manage configuration files
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:09:52PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> save_original
>> merge_with_current
>> export UCF_FORCE_CONFFOLD=1
>> ucf.etcgit "$@"
>
> So this will leave the ucf db with a horribly incorrect vie
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>
>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>> shipped with the packages. But that has nothing to do with ucf.
>
> What does "hook into apt-get" mean?
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>> shipped with the packages.
>
> You cannot, since the very purpose of ucf is to give dpkg-conffile-like
> behavior for configuration
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>>>> shipped
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>>>> shipped with the packages.
>>>
&
Hi Enrico,
Enrico Zini wrote:
> * The proposal
>
> At the end of this mail is the list that I propose: it's 138 of them,
> but grouped as they are, they should be quite clear to grasp. I
> consider these groups of tags (debtags calls them facets) to be mature
> and uncontroversial enough to be
Hi Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>>
52 matches
Mail list logo
