Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lat
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Loren Bandiera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.mmgsecurity.com/~lorenb/lat/
* License : GPL
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: millerquest
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Urpo Lankinen
* URL : http://www.beastwithin.org/users/olf/games/millerquest/
* License : GPL
Description
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi!
> The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
> source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
> can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as
> there are heavy dependencies between xen and the kernel
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 at 03:30:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi!
> Bastian Blank, a member of the Debian kernel team, is looking at integrating
> XenoLinux builds into the official linux-2.6 package. I think that's a much
> better option, and would strongly encourage anyone interested in Xen
> p
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> > This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to
> > unstable,
> > and our packages I think are almost ready too!
>
> This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
> the meantim
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
> As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
> dom0 only ?).
Actually I think he meant the hypervisors too... Anyway I also think that if the
kernel team is going to maintain the kernel images there sh
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> Well, if the kernel team answers "left to the kernel team" and you close the
> alioth project, I guess you can always move into the kernel team ;)
>
Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen
h
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> I agree. I just would like to ask that, please, don't disband just because of
> disagreement with the kernel team, but try to cooperate anyway.
>
I don't think we want to! And I hope there is no disagreement (we still don't
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> It is a sort of kernel.
Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the
kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
> Just to say, how connected xen to linux is:
>
> Fo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> > Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems
> > the
> > kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
>
> The dom0 kernel is a Linux kernel built for the Xen hypervisor
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to
> the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in
> stable. We're obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I
>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> The kernel patches for XEN should be maintained inside the kernel team and in
> linux-2.6, they are free to join the kernel team to handle this, but it is
> unacceptable to have some kind of external patch to the kernel floating
>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
>
Then why don't you just join and commit your fixes before anybody tried to
release it?
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:17:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> > I can.
>
> :)
>
> Guido, be warned that Bastian often communicates with a few monosylabes and
> SVN commits :) This doesn't make working with him too problematic usually
> though :)
>
We've been a bit more chatty, for now, b
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> I guess that if people are able to find a kernel source tree outside of
> debian, they are perfectly capable of downloading and applying a patch too.
>
> Just include an URL to wherever such a patch is in the README.Debian of the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnome-keyring-sharp
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Russell Cloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://russell.rucus.net/2005/gnome-keyring-sharp/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: umview
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : View-OS team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/view-os
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-01
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nagios-plugins
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Various (will all be listed in copyright file)
* URL : http://nagiosplug.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:01:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> The distro used on dom0 is pretty uninteresting, given that part of the
> point of having Xen-style virtualization for servers is to a) be able to run
> different OSes in different guests, and b) not to run services in dom0.[1]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ganeti Debian Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ganeti
Version : 1.2~b1
Upstream Author : Ganeti Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
, a quite borderline case, but it indeed exists.
Bye,
Guido
--
Guido Trotter
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ultrt on irc
pgplxJDaw8rdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ere
> requests for a new version, which they were not.
>
The features included in that version (and listed in upstream changelog)
solve the problems reported in the other two report...
Bye,
Guido
--
Guido Trotter
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpPTT07Zybha.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter
* Package name: lxc
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : IBM Corporation
* URL : http://lxc.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Linux containers userspace tools
This
Hi,
I'd be happy to help, if you don't find any better suited candidate
(if you have volunteers who are more expert than me, by all means go
for them!!) I definitely have made it to plenty of debconfs, and sure
hope to continue the trend.
Thanks,
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
Great messaging. Until about 1/2 of the email I was wondering where
this was going to go and finding it plausible.
Thanks for the morning laugh!
Guido
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> A potential issue in the DFSG freeness of the Debian keyrings has been
> brought to
25 matches
Mail list logo
