Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: smbind
Version : 0.4.7
Upstream Author : Ole Myhre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/smbind/
* License : GPL
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: atmail
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : @Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.atmail.org/
* License : Apache License Version 2.0
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: procinfo-ng
Version : 2.0.196
Upstream Author : Thaddeus Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : htt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: arpon
Version : 1.40
Upstream Author : Andrea Di Pasquale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://arpon.sourceforge.n
Guus Sliepen ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
>
>> Description : arp handler inspection
>
> That is not a short description, that is just the expansion of the
> acronym.
Yes, this won't to be package synopsis.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: apf
Version : 9.6-4
Upstream Author : R-fx Networks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.r-fx.org/apf.p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libapache2-mod-spamhaus
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Luca Ercoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.
Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
> Or zen.spamhaus.org (which is actually a BIT more, but the recommended
> list)
Recommended for smtp service, not for web server.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: nmapsi4
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nmapsi4.netsons.org/we
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: dm-raid45
Version : 20081027
Upstream Author : Heinz Mauelshagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.redhat.c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: fspy
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Richard Sammet
* URL : http://mytty.org/fspy/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qmailadmin
Version : 1.2.11
Upstream Author : Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmailadmin/
* License : GPL
Program
Hi,
Il 10/05/2010 22:15, Iker Salmón San Millán ha scritto:
> Hi, i didn't know where or how to report this, but i have readed in a
> forum that an user has tried |chromium-browser from experimental and
> seems that it includes by default those privative codecs. I have tried
> by myself and i agre
severity 580947 important
thanks
Il 11/05/2010 10:44, Reinhard Tartler ha scritto:
> checking [2], reveals that I'm partly wrong. There is an in-source copy
> of ffmpeg, that there is an option 'use_system_ffmpeg=1' passed to the
> buildscript. This indicates that I indeed missed that upstream now
Il 11/05/2010 17:35, Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
> How can you expect this to work? The ABI of the system ffmpeg libraries
> is not going to match the ABI defined by the bundled headers. You must
> patch chromium to work with the system ffmpeg headers.
chromium doesn't link against the ffmpeg lib
Il 12/05/2010 06:38, Reinhard Tartler ha scritto:
> TBH, I'm very skeptical. While I'm not sure why google has decided to
> choose astrange's branch/fork, I fear that there have been too many
> changes to the external public API that this is not going to work out.
> I'm basing this opinion on the G
Il 18/05/2010 19:12, Ryan Oram ha scritto:
> "Chrome Incognito Tracks Visited Sites"
> http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html
I just backported upstream commit that fixes this huge privacy killer
bug...
> This seems to be becoming a theme. As Chromium has much of
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I request assistance with maintaining the chromium-browser package.
In reality, the team mentioned in the Maintainer field currently consists of me.
This package really needs a team to work on it.
Alioth project: https
On 06/30/2010 06:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian
> GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome
> beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux repository. Is this
> intentional?
No, we follow the s
On 07/17/2010 03:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> You should not specify a `Pre-Depends' entry for a package before this
> has been discussed on the `debian-devel' mailing list and a consensus
> about doing that has been reached.
>
> Did you do that?
No I didn't, I'm doing that now.
dkms
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
> nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
> Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
On 08/10/2010 09:25 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Chromium isn't meant to be released with Squeeze. We'll reevaluate for
>> > Squeeze+1.
> Is that still the case?
No, it isn't. Please see #581265 and in particular message #32, #37 and #44
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
22 matches
Mail list logo
