Re: Enabling some -Werror=format* by default?

2024-06-10 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Helmut Grohne [2024-06-10 18:01]: > Ideally, we'd not just do a rebuild with the flags, but also do a > rebuild without and then compare the binary .debs. In the event that we > misguide configure, we expect the .debs to differ and otherwise to equal > due to the work of the reproducible builds

Re: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-10-03 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [2024-10-03 22:03]: > On 2024-09-26 01:35:45 [+0200], Fay Stegerman wrote: > > For example, ZIP files or Android APKs built on a Debian system will have a > > different compressed stream, like the test files you mention. Which will > > likely &

Re: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-09-24 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]: [...] > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound > great (even for trixie), but I guess we can take it slow if you do not > feel confident or have concerns over this. As using an alternative zlib implementation could impact Reproduci

Re: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-09-25 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Guillem Jover [2024-09-25 01:55]: > Hi! > > On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 00:39:10 +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > > * Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]: > > > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound > > > great (even for trixie), but I guess

Re: RFC: "Recommended bloat", and how to possibly fix it

2024-11-06 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues [2024-11-06 02:28]: [...] > Have one package diffoscope and one package diffoscope-full and you could even > have a package diffoscope-minimal and there you have user-selectable > granularity. We already have two diffoscope packages for exactly this reason (I wo

diffoscope dependency granularity [was RFC: "Recommended bloat", and how to possibly fix it]

2024-11-06 Thread Fay Stegerman
[Added diffosc...@lists.reproducible-builds.org to Cc] * Fay Stegerman [2024-11-06 17:43]: > * Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues [2024-11-06 02:28]: > [...] > > Have one package diffoscope and one package diffoscope-full and you could > > even > > have a package diffosco

Re: RFC: "Recommended bloat", and how to possibly fix ito

2024-11-07 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Aaron Rainbolt [2024-11-08 00:21]: [...] > However, this isn't that hard to rectify - rather than specifying the > depth at which apt should stop installing recommends, one can specify > the packages in the dependency tree from which apt should install > recommends from. I.e., to replicate --no-

Re: [Summary]: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-11-23 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Chris Hofstaedtler [2024-11-23 20:56]: > * Fay Stegerman [241123 19:58]: > > I agree that it *should not* be Debian's responsibility to ensure > > compatibility > > with Fedora/Windows/etc., but the reality is that if "you need the same > > tools to &

Re: [Summary]: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-12-16 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Guillem Jover [2024-11-22 12:29]: [...] > * There were concerns (from Fay) about whether given same input the > output changes per arch or hw setup, we'd need to check this; I'd > expect this not to be the case for different arches, but it might > be an issue with number of cores f

Re: [Summary]: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

2024-11-23 Thread Fay Stegerman
* Guillem Jover [2024-11-22 12:29]: [...] > * There were concerns (from Fay) about the output stream changing due > to a potential implementation switch and that affecting external > reproducibility. Personally I think while I can see how this is > annoying for the involved parties,