Re: emacs19 removal? [was: rms@gnu.org: Bug#57636: Security problem with emacs19]

2000-03-11 Thread Ethan Benson
cape is an outdated version. it still needs the 4.7 binaries. -- Ethan Benson

Re: emacs19 removal? [was: rms@gnu.org: Bug#57636: Security problem with emacs19]

2000-03-11 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 03:52:16PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:19:29PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > BTW I was told removing all non-current Netscape Navigator versions > > > will be done RSN (if it wasn't already done, haven't checked t

Re: 5 days till Bug Horizon

2000-03-25 Thread Ethan Benson
onfig? > > What's RH's chkconfig do? its basically equivilent to update-rc.d except it lets you twiddle stuff on and off by runlevel without having to -f remove the whole batch of symlinks and then reinstall them again the way you wanted. i don't know what it has to

Re: stuffit expander?

2000-03-27 Thread Ethan Benson
ip. which unix utilities should not have any problem with. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Re: stuffit expander?

2000-03-27 Thread Ethan Benson
; Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows > > uncompression of Mac .sit (stuffit) archives? > > I think you want the macutils package. nope, that package does not include the stuffit 1.5 utilities, because they are quite old and broken. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Re: WNPP

2000-03-28 Thread Ethan Benson
Developer | http://www.debian.org > Linux Systems Engineer @ Winstar | http://www.winstar.com > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp49fUG5IAmR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ITP: lirc, devfsd

2000-04-03 Thread Ethan Benson
d experimental at that) there are some of us who don't care for devfs and do not wish to use it. [0] read making it exceedingly inconvenient to forgo or disable devfs in 2.4 kernels, for example neglecting to maintain or provide a real (non-devfs) working /dev directory. -- Ethan Benson http:

Re: Learning dpkg/apt

2000-08-19 Thread Ethan Benson
dlocate it solves that problem the Right Way. (unfortunatly it got removed from potato for less then critical bugs) -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpiQMnRN865i.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Learning dpkg/apt

2000-08-19 Thread Ethan Benson
hat can be better achieved by rebuilding a binary database with a cron job as in dlocate. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpMxwPV4b8ir.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Security of Debian SuX0r?

2000-09-02 Thread Ethan Benson
d how to > change them. wrong, ssh only cares if the home directory is *WRITABLE* by other users then the owner, not if its readable. my home directory is mode 710 and ssh works fine, on other systems my home is mode 755 and ssh still works fine (all with RSA auth and StrictModes yes) -

Re: Security of Debian SuX0r?

2000-09-02 Thread Ethan Benson
with my home directory group set to my private group `eb' same deal. perhaps you have a different version of ssh? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp4bkUmaIT9B.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
ould be > pretty convenient. perhaps because in the default configuration there is no display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X. also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the admin to define. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpIC6edoyEDt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote: > >>>>> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no > EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
ough*) there was a bit of discussion on fixing this but i don't know if its being worked on actively or not. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpGe0PalLsBj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
centage of the installed base but it does > exist and is used. except this configuration has nothing to do with the runlevel links. you have to alter the configuration file for xdm or whatever to not manage a local X server, but you still need the daemon started at boot, by yes

Re: OT Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

2000-09-06 Thread Ethan Benson
mails > a year or so ago, I had a thrombosis about it. maybe he was using one of those broken MUAs that don't understand RFC 2015? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpkigoy52ZFa.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: NSA's Secure Linux Distribution

2000-12-23 Thread Ethan Benson
ainst the > possibility of Trusted (AIX|Solaris|PalmOS|whatever closed os) going belly > up. Hi, I'm from the government, I'm here to help you. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp6FbsCU6pA4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-23 Thread Ethan Benson
t from a packaging system. what exactly is missing/wrong with the debian packaging system that makes you feel the need for wheel reinvention? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp6VFfxPZxrY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-24 Thread Ethan Benson
rfect, you can always help the > development of Dpkg, or apt. i think the problem is supporting older machines such as 486s. bzip2 is horridly slow on this hardware. and iirc bzip2 takes more memory (or its slower the less memory you have...) since its been discussed before thats all ill say a

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-24 Thread Ethan Benson
dpkg's code in 3 years. personally the plain text database is one of dpkg's greatest assets. its a royal pain to repair a binary database when it gets fscked. and yes i have already been saved from a total reinstall through the ability to fix dpkg's broken database with a text edit

Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in

2000-12-26 Thread Ethan Benson
just outputs a message saying the file has been replaced, and follows the new one. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpg3TAN5txVY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-03 Thread Ethan Benson
NOT your own. as for including other's in the Mail-Followup-To mutt only does this if those users had used `lists' instead of `subscribe' indicating they WANT to be CCed. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpaK7nUjHzUw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
there is no M-F-To header. mutt then sets the M-F-To header to include you for the benifit of later list-replies. if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been made? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpqtpqwUSa94.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
r big offender of ignorage of M-F-To. (i am not sure if it respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just started adding that.) btw is it Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody ? i have seen both which is correct? (assuming any MUA actually pays any attention to this header anyway)

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
k on this problem and just did away with cached man pages altogether. (no suid or sgid man) -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp1CiH8rxzJQ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:53:37PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > the problem with this is you end up with the catman files owned by > > whatever user reads whatever man page. personally as a sysadmin i > > don't want users gaining write permission t

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about. oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older versions of Gnus ignored M-F-To but the current one does not. go fuck off. -- Ethan Ben

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
t one no longer has this problem like another poster did you had to be insulting and condescending. well i returned the favor. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpBzEHyz3hjA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: our broken man package

2001-01-04 Thread Ethan Benson
please wait... ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp]$ this one is the wrapper's fault, it does a chdir() somewhere and then gzip doesn't find the page (since it gets a relative pathname). -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpkyqZNkMlCj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: What to do about /etc/debian_version

2001-01-06 Thread Ethan Benson
am which modifies it. because /var is not always on the same partition as / -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpCm5HRdFdRO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-22 Thread Ethan Benson
re a particular reason to use /var/secure-bind rather than > say /var/named which seems to be some what of an informal default. > > I'm going to ask on the FHS mailing list about their thoughts on chroot > enviroments and how it might fit in FHS policy. it certainly would

Re: FYI: dh_upx compresses i386 executables

2001-04-22 Thread Ethan Benson
it wouldn't call the compressing code directly, > but through a wrapper). makes sense > Any objections? see above -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp84tJynUGQt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

2001-04-22 Thread Ethan Benson
2.2.19/include/linux: modules Only in /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.2.19/include/linux: modversions.h Only in /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.2.19/include/linux: version.h -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpdltxGcorGG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-22 Thread Ethan Benson
c so your Mail-Followup-To header will be properly setup. > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > > the way i do it is the initscript replaces the binaries in the chroot > > jail before starting them, this way the mainline bind package can > > get upgraded

Re: chroot bind?

2001-04-22 Thread Ethan Benson
[ i do read the list so i don't need a CC ] On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:12:59PM +1200, Nicholas Lee wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 04:54:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > fine, no disagreement here, what im pointing out is that with at least > > bind 8 (some

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

2001-04-23 Thread Ethan Benson
in to change with new kernels. i suppose you could modifiy make-kpkg to save an ls -R or something to a file and compare afterwords but that seems gross and perhaps unreliable. its just not as trivial as it sounds i don't think. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp474GbYTWez.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: updating of /etc/rc?.d

2001-04-24 Thread Ethan Benson
in runlevel 0 or 6 update-rc.d will refuse to add any new links. policy requires the use of update-rc.d so packages can't add any links so long as you leave at least one. if you find a package that does otherwise thats a bug. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpraRgfTyidx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: FYI: dh_upx compresses i386 executables

2001-04-24 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:14:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:00:13AM -0400, Itai Zukerman wrote: > >> you want. The postinst code would call the compression routines, > >> which might not

Re: FYI: dh_upx compresses i386 executables

2001-04-24 Thread Ethan Benson
ion every time the package is upgraded to get a fulltime normal non-upx binary if they don't want this crap. > You seem to want *all* binaries compressed. I'm suggesting that some > binaries are best left uncompressed, and that that would be the > maintainer's decision. a

Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

2001-04-30 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:36:21AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Unless, of course, you can do your filtering on the mail server, as I do. and how many isps allow this? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpnnXUWcAbZ4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: chroot bind?

2001-05-02 Thread Ethan Benson
/var/svr would make more sense IMO. / has enough already. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpzKTBOmogXj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Does BTS clean old bugs?

2001-05-06 Thread Ethan Benson
chived. thats what the `search archived bugs' option in the search page is for. it would be quite a mess if bugs were listed on packages for eternity after they are closed. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpIaPrppsOaj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [FLAME WARNING] Linux Standards Base and Debian

2001-05-09 Thread Ethan Benson
HO, it should be up to the distribution makers to do packaging, not upstream as its usually not thier specialty and thus they often end up making a crappy package. standard or not i think this will always be the case. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpOxtWHvUj1l.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [FLAME WARNING] Linux Standards Base and Debian

2001-05-09 Thread Ethan Benson
l. this choice of using the rpm binary format should be reconsidered IMNSHO. i don't really care whether you use the debian ar+tar+gzip, or just plain .tar.gz, just use something i can extract *anywhere* with the most basic and standard tools, without having to go and compile rpm or some

Re: [FLAME WARNING] Linux Standards Base and Debian

2001-05-09 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 05:47:00PM -0500, Sam TH wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:14:20PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > this choice of using the rpm binary format should be reconsidered > > IMNSHO. i don't really care whether you use the debian ar+tar+gzip, > > or ju

Re: [FLAME WARNING] Linux Standards Base and Debian

2001-05-09 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:32:14PM -0400, Timothy H. Keitt wrote: > Its been a while, but if I remember correctly, RPMs are in cpio format. no there not, they are in a goofed up customized cpio format that cpio no longer recognizes. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erben

Re: [FLAME WARNING] Linux Standards Base and Debian

2001-05-09 Thread Ethan Benson
2cpio. based on cpio is a far cry from BEING a cpio archive. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpKEg8ZiZOog.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: sysctl should disable ECN by default

2001-09-02 Thread Ethan Benson
e the option). > > Or just ask via debconf. no package is permitted to modify /etc/sysctl.conf. its a conffile belonging to procps, anything (except the admin) modifying it should receive a severity serious bug report. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpNGXvwRWTuS.pg

Re: How many people need locales?

2001-09-03 Thread Ethan Benson
o be asked about it very often. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpaj56BYr3S8.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#111158: Kernel 2.4.5+ network timeouts

2001-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
c/network/options just like the current syncookies option. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpdcJlLCjCrr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: reopening ECN bugreport/netbase

2001-09-05 Thread Ethan Benson
to 2.2 you start getting errors at boot again. since aj won't add anything to netbase the admin will simply have to turn off ecn themselves. thats the only option. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgprCsGk5u9zP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: reopening ECN bugreport/netbase

2001-09-05 Thread Ethan Benson
/ask the user about > it when installing a new kernel. and store/implement it where? /etc/sysctl.conf is unacceptable as its a conffile belonging to procps. and personally i don't want /etc/sysctl.conf to become another debconf [mis]managed config file. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alas

Re: unable to stat `./usr/share/man/man3/qcanvas.3qt.gz' (which I was about to install): Value too large for defined data type

2001-09-11 Thread Ethan Benson
ROTECTED]:~ > % df -h /usr/share/man/man3/ > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/hda3 27G 20G 7.6G 72% / > > > "mount" shows: > > /dev/hda3 on / type reiserfs (rw) might i suggest XFS, or even ext2. -- Ethan Bens

Re: root rm: Permission denied (Was: unable to stat `./usr/share/man/man3/qcanvas.3qt.gz')

2001-09-11 Thread Ethan Benson
ermission denied i would suggest the immutable flag, but AFAIK reiserfs has no such thing. thats the only time ive ever seen root denied permission to do such things (other then /proc..). sure someone isn't playing a joke on you and replaced /bin/su with fakeroot ;-) -- Ethan Benson http://

Re: Purposely broken/uninstallable packages in archive

2001-09-19 Thread Ethan Benson
foot, let them. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgp6ddkqrcUEp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Purposely broken/uninstallable packages in archive

2001-09-20 Thread Ethan Benson
til the next release after woody when debian-installer may become viable you have to live with these -bf packages as they currently exist. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpxi2U3XK3cG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)

2001-09-22 Thread Ethan Benson
yes the proper way is usually /etc/default/package which has config variables for the initscript, such as CHROOT=yes -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpMr4lCrK712.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Disappearing task-* packages!

2001-09-26 Thread Ethan Benson
discussed in various places. task- packages are a ugly kludge that have been replaced by a proper implementation: the Task: feild of the control file, the new tasksel uses this now instead of task- packages. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpKbCLNHL3z4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: XFS Kernel image packaging

2001-09-26 Thread Ethan Benson
n. if you were insane enough to get a kernel supporting all of ext2, ext3, xfs, and reiserfs and had all the mkfs utils you would be offered a choice between all 4. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpirMoQI66kv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

2001-09-26 Thread Ethan Benson
hat the mount in question correct, mount --bind is just a shortcut for: mount -t none -o bind /somewhere /some/where/else -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpJ94Db6avqu.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

2001-09-26 Thread Ethan Benson
--bind' but not '-t none' or '-o > bind'?) i don't know that either.. i prefer the latter since its standard usage of mount, it also makes it more clear that something like this in /etc/fstab will (and does) work as expected: /tmp/var/tmpnonebind0