Hello Debian-Devel mailing list =D
imho, an interesting topic. In conjunction with [1] my first notion
was: We should not guide that proprietary software is insecure.
That's not correct, i.e. in the case of non-free-firmware it is nearly
equivalent to say that the usage of proprietary hardware i
Hello Marc,
I am currently new as Debian Maintainer, but I have more experience
from upstream-side.
As I understand your question about a general workflow of translations
in all your email-cases correct, I think the short answer maybe to use
`quilt` to patch the .PO files instead of committing t
Hello Stephan,
On 3/12/25 12:10 PM, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
Hello everyone
The “drivers” for hardware video decoders on Intel GPUs have been split
into free and non-free packages.
https://packages.debian.org/en/sid/intel-media-va-driver
https://packages.debian.org/en/sid/intel-media-va-drive
Hell Stephan =)
On 3/15/25 12:52 PM, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 13.03.2025 um 02:37 +0100 schrieb Dirk Lehmann:
GPU shaders should be clearly respected as software (and not
hardware). Therefore, `intel-media-va-driver-non-free` is rightly in
the Debian archive `non-free
Hey Marc,
On 3/11/25 12:03 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
Basically the same applies for this step than for the POT generation
step, with the additional hardship that the PO files are generated,
being written to by a program AND STILL contain a significant part of
human work. I never know how much work o
5 matches
Mail list logo
