Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML> I wish only know if out there's a .deb for PGP 2.6.3i ... tnx
Read ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/README.pgp.
--
_
/ \ "The cat's been in the box for over
| David Maze | 20 y
Is there any way to get directories that don't have the normal
architecture structure, i.e. project/experimental, to show up in
dselect using the ftp backend? (I at least want the Packages file to
get loaded when I press [U]pdate...)
--
_
/
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SD> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HM> On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 08:59:50AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
LA> The kernel-source-2.0.32 deb has a 130K diff file against the
LA> standard source. Just where do these patches come from and why
LA
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AR> Wht about a package that contains the following commands (yet to be
AR> written):
AR>
AR> xuseradd # Add's the user to the x group
AR> xuserdel # Deletes the user from the x group
AR>
AR> The package would have an config file where it lists all u
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mar 27/05/2003 à 20:42, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>> Description : A LiveJournal client for the GNOME desktop
>>
>> Drivel is a LiveJournal.com client for the GNOME desktop.
>>
>> It supports all livejournal-based servers, and allows you to p
My kernel module packages (lm-sensors and i2c) both build-depend on
kernel-build-2.4.20-1, which provides enough bits to build packages
(as far as I can tell, successfully). Problem is, evidence suggests
that kernel-build-2.4.20-1 is i386-only. I'm looking at moving to
2.4.21, but kernel-build-2.
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How many Debian users are there that will use lm-sensors and i2c
> modules for a prepackaged kernel on a non-i386 architecture?
I've had at least one user ask me about support for powerpc, which is
the big thing that's driving me to ask. If it makes you h
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
>> me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and
>> needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance!
>
> So, are you volunteering to help those of us without a
Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 07:24, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 9.1.1
("Debian should obey the FHS"; I don't claim to be an FHS expert, but
all it seems to say about /etc is "no binaries", which this doesn't
vio
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO we need to make an addition to policy stating that an old lib can
> not be removed from the archive until no other packages still depend on
> it.
So say I maintain foo. The source package produces two binary
packages, foo and libfoo1. Now, there's
Frederik Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I really think aptitude should only show end user packages with
>> decent, readable, localised names ("Apache Web Server", "x Chat (IRC
>> Client)", "Infrared Control for XMMS"). At the moment the user is
>> completely overwhelmed by the list of pac
7; is often quite theraputic for odd problems
like this. Screwing up --append-to-version using kernel-package has
kind of unfortunate side effects for recovering. :-/
> People, stock kernels are very comfortable, but building modules for
> them is not! Please tell me what I did wrong, or mak
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> So, I'm curious why you chose to make it a part of the Debian
>> kernel source, rather than a separate patch (kernel-patch-ipsec or
>> such).
>
> Well the reason for it to be in the default kernel-source is s
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> He said use the kernel-headers package, not
>> kernel-package. Any debian packaged module shall work with something
>> like:
>
>> ./debian/rules KVERS="2.4.21" KSRC="/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4
Henning Moll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b.
> This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But
> that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed.
> This would mean a dependency to a dev
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for someone to take over maintenance of the lm-sensors
hardware monitoring package, along with the corresponding i2c interface
kernel modules. These two packages have the same upstream and they're
pretty closely related, so it'd be nice if they had the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> The discussion about the libc6-dev package and its headers let me to the
> impression that the Debian package structure isn't optimal for
> libraries. If anyone wants to build his own version of a package (i.e.
> libwxgtk2.4) he has to get all the dependent
Dennis Stampfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> timeoutd loggs user out when they reached timeout-restrictions like max.
> login-time, max. idle-time, etc.
>
> Is there any way to querry how long a X-user is idle?
You might look at the xscreensaver driver source; the basic answer is
"yes, about fou
Robert Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Package name: kernel-patch-sensors
> Version : 2.6.5
> Upstream Author : The Lm_sensors Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/
> * License : GPL
> Description : Lm-sensors is a hardwa
The perennial wart on the side of kernel module packages is that it's
a big pain to auto-build modules for the stock kernels. It looks like
the 2.4.20 kernel packages now include a kernel-build package, which
advertises that it contains everything you need to do module builds.
Is there a good way
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:45:30PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
>> (a) Repackaging lm-sensors 2.6.5, which would just have libsensors1
>> 1:2.6.5-1, which in turn would Conflict: with any packages that
>> have compile
"Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Q: is content-disposition handled properly, especially for
> messag/rfc822 type attachments? (Or if not, are message attachments
> displayed inline by default?)
Gnus: yes (since 5.8.0, the first MIME-aware version)
> (Y
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not kick upstream into releasing 2.7.1 with proper soname bump to
> libsensors2 (Make sure they are aware they screwed up...). Then upload
> libsensors2, there are only 8 sources depending on libsensors1 now so
> it wouldn't be a big deal to rebuild t
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kernel module policy:
> -
>
> * Kernel modules must be provided as a "binary source" package.
> * Module source packages should provide a debian/rules file.
> * The debian/rules file must compile the module if KSRC=kernelsourcedir
>
Marc L de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MLdB> What I am trying to build are a couple of packages (let's call one of
MLdB> these mydata.deb) containing just ordinary files, related to a
MLdB> specific application. All these packages Depend on a generic
MLdB> configuration package. This configura
25 matches
Mail list logo
