Re: Bug#381221: ITP: dpkg-view -- View the contents of .deb packages without root access

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.2248 +0100]: >> * Package name: dpkg-view >> Version : 0.0.2 >> Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * URL : http://dpkg-view.alioth.debian.org >> *

Re: I like the new Release

"Greg Conner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It make be fake but is it a bad idea? A release every year and afterr a > good summer of work? Does anybody have a better idea? FWIW: According to the headers, this mail is sent from the same machine as the original fake. -- ilmari -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Frank wrote: >> >> The >> >> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nicely, it's a PostScript >> >> printer. >> > >> > Not on my computer. The CUPS queues (and default postscript for that >> > matter) are broke in latest firefox on my system. "Pap

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 4

Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> (In fact, IMHO nothing should depends from perl-modules at all). > > Correct. I'd prefer that nothing did. Is this documented anywhere? If is really is the case that nothing should de

Re: multiarch status update

"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/16/06, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 02:11:08PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> >> See the system calls link(2) and symlink(2). The (Essential) coreutils >> >> package provides a userspace binary

Re: multiarch status update

"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/16/06, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I don't care about the implementation details, but if it requires >> > kernel support, then yes. >> >> How shoul

Re: UTF-8 encoding of changelog files

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes: > So is this valid utf-8? I don't believe so. If it is I have to go > reread the UTF-8 spec again. :) > > 4b c4 99 73 74 75 74 69 73 (K..stutis) > (I found this one in base-config from sarge since I happened to have > that one open in a hex editor

Re: Request for ideas how to fix #297074

Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: >> 1. use an editor which can auto-detect the file encoding, e.g. vim >> AND >> 2. run poedit on a file which is in encoding A, while your locale is set >> to use encoding B. (where neither

Re: [RFD] optimized versions of openssl

"Vince Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think I can safely speak for everyone on debian-devel as per this: > > 1) The difference in overall speed is small, and rarely publically > reported. The 1% gain is individually considered either vital > must-have, or worthless. You have obviousl

Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++

"Martin v. LÃwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >> So using a 386 as a router and firewall, which it is perfectly capable >> of hardwarewise [snip] > b) Do you then have 10MB or 100MB ethernet in that computer? > Can you even put a 100MB ethernet card into the computer?

Re: Dropping/splitting (proper) i386 support

Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW: do you have any quantative numbers on the i386/i486 performance > issues (e.g. for openssl)? I hacked up a quick script () that compares two 'openssl speed' outputs and gives you the ratio, here's the output for i386 vs i4

Re: dash and hidden bashisms in configure scripts

"Andrej Shadura" writes: > Well, we might make bash non-essential at one point. OTOH development > systems are likely to have it anyway. A compromise could be to make it build-essential instead. - ilmari

Re: generic viewer for md files

Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:36:50AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> is there a virtual package for viewing MD documents > Do you mean Markdown? Are there specialized viewers for it at all? The only one I know is https://metacpan.org/pod/sdview, but that's not packaged

Re: Bug#1016130: ITP: asdf -- multiple language runtime version manager

Ole Streicher writes: > The URL is asdf-vm.com > > Maybe this could be called "asdf-vm" according to the upstream name? > "asdf" also refers to the Advanced Scientific Data Format, > https://github.com/asdf-format/. Also Common Lisp's Another System Definition Facility, https://asdf.common-lisp.