Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: yubihsm-connector
Version : 3.0.4
Upstream Contact: Yubico Open Source Maintainers
* URL : https://developers.yubico.com/yubihsm-connector/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-expandvars
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Contact: Arijit Basu
* URL : https://github.com/sayanarijit/expandvars
* License : MIT
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: yubihsm-shell
Version : 2.5.0
Upstream Contact: Yubico Open Source Maintainers
* URL : https://developers.yubico.com/yubihsm-shell/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-yubihsm
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Contact: Dain Nilsson
* URL : https://github.com/Yubico/python-yubihsm
* License : Apache-2.0
an
> > create a patch specifically for moarchiving.
>
> As reported elsewhere, moarchiving declares a dep on it but doesn't
> actually import it.
> This needs to be fixed upstream to.
I proposed https://github.com/CMA-ES/moarchiving/pull/9 upstream.
--
Colin Watson (he/hi
e context you're using it in (desktop, server, cloud, etc.).
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
e quite happy with a plain
directory as long as it has the right files in it, and it doesn't need a
.git subdirectory. It seems as though you'd just need to have QMK_HOME
fall back to /usr/share/qmk-firmware (or whatever) if it isn't
explicitly set. Am I mis
ut it seems a
big coincidence that the symlink was dropped a few days after this IRC
conversation; and yet it seems nobody bothered to do the most basic due
diligence that I pointed out here, which is kind of sad. (I fixed
wireless-tools after this change caused an RC bug there.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
time trying to debug them from cold, such as
AppArmor profiles and example scripts, and it's just good manners to
give maintainers an explicit heads-up.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:30:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> * for Debian trixie (current testing):
>
>* add dependency-only packages called something like
> openssh-client-gsskex and openssh-server-gsskex, depending on their
> non-gsskex alternatives
>
a non-deprecated way.
(Sometimes that requires other adjustments too, but in this case adding
the build-dependency on its own is enough.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
ng when you first
add something to the unreleased changelog, and "dch -r" will update it
when you're ready to make an upload), but it should be present. Leaving
it empty isn't the usual practice among other developers as far as I've
seen, and it&#x
will be equal to the
values in the packages themselves, but those values are nevertheless
overridden. This means that uploading a new version of a package to
attempt to change its priority or section has no effect; if you need to
change those, you _must_ get ftpmaster to change the override, and
otherw
nvestigate why they're not reaching the
debian-devel-announce readership.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:20:39PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:51:45AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > For people who care about getting sarge out, it's not useful to put out
> > a report listing 726 bugs, only 150 of which matter, in a form that
> > makes i
tements like 'debconf is not a
> >registry'.)
>
> Why is the information given during package installation stored
> persistently in the first place?
As a convenience so that you don't have to waste time answering
questions again and again.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is Section: base. and,
> iiuc, base should be self-contained (that is, packages in base must
> not depend on packages outside it).
I don't believe such a restriction exists. "Section: base" is pretty
much a relic, obsoleted long ago by debootstrap.
--
Colin Watson
when mozilla-firefox is actually ready for testing in its own
right (it's currently missing a sparc build).
> Eric: Should we upload with priority=high to be ready for Sarge ASAP?
britney already considers mozilla-firefox urgency=critical due to:
mozilla-firefox (0.10.1+1.0PR-1) experime
e release management team.
:-( In future, please perform such widespread audits *before* base
system freezes, not *during* them.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the GFDL must be released, for which
the optimists among us may still hope.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bug if necessary.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stops
> > believing us and finds an option that actually works.
>
> I started using Linux (and Debian) a couple months after Woody "came
> out." Was woody due "any day now" for a year like this?
To a large extent, yes.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ort
dependency problems encountered in the configure step, nor exit non-zero
when it encounters them. See bug #55364. It's much more efficient for
users to keep the old .debs around and simply use dpkg -i, which will
exit non-zero on errors and allow you to put the old .deb back.
Seems clear that
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:22:43AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > Given that -source packages do not adequately specify the dependencies
> > to be able to use the output, one must NEVER run "dpkg -i" a giv
virtual package
> than "mp3-encoder".
What would the interface provided by such a virtual package be?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the bug.
Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package,
they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to correctly
support the differing argument conventions. In which case, why not just
depend on the encoders they know ho
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:01:15PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:41AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package,
> > they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to corre
> the mirror push? Somehow can consistent versions of xxx and yyy
> either be made sure to go out this mirror run together, or both wait
> for the next run?
That's the problem that the testing distribution is intended to solve.
--
Colin Watson
t; >
> > Package: texgd (debian/main)
>
> But actually tex4ht has two RC-bugs (both tagged sarge-ignore, but the
> package is being worked on, see [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> What happened to the other RC bug?
They're merged, so it only lists the first.
--
Colin Watson
ebstd, its interface and implementation suck, and I have maintained
it while never really deigning to use it. Now there is a remplacment:
dh_install, which ...
- copies files, doesn't move them. Closes: #75360, #82649
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:59:00PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:54:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >> > Re: Daniel Burrows in <
o have 2GB mbox files?
Consider a spam-bin folder that you don't split by month or whatever and
don't check very often.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:27:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 10:23 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > I have severa
g particularly given the lacking support
for Unicode HYPHEN in many fonts (especially on the console).
(Either way, it should still be configurable, and manual pages should
still be fixed.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ork with the well-founded
expectation that it would be part of sarge. It's not fair to do this
sort of thing at the last minute.
After sarge is a different matter, though.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
y making it an essential part of our
infrastructure?
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is whether it
goes on ftp.d.o or scc.d.o. There's a point of view that says that
committing to release powerpc from scc.d.o means that we're committed to
making sure that we *can* release architectures from scc.d.o, which is a
good thing ...
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
-wise points to http://www.debian.org/ports/)?
I like this idea. SCC was a working codename that I think was originally
intended to be changed as soon as somebody thought of something better,
but nobody ever quite got round to it ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PR
here.
Right. We might need to do either etch-ignore or a lower severity in the
meantime, though; Architecture: would take a little while to implement
properly.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:38:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:10:30PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Colin Watson [Mon, Mar 14 2005, 02:40:56PM]:
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:31:30PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> >
if we could simply use the current support in britney for
declaring that an architecture isn't keeping up to date and that any
problems with it shouldn't block the rest of testing. I'm not sure what
the consequences of that would be for the usability of testing on
non-releasin
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:18:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:36:33AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > There is no transfer needed at all, IOW the capability to do releases
> > from ports.debian.org exists (and is a very good thing, as Colin
>
tax considerations,
most of the things you list don't really seem to be among them.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s on the so-called
> > "mirror split".
>
> I guess so, but I haven't seen any status update about this.
> Are there even people working on it?
Apparently so:
http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2005/11/16#2005-11-16-dak
--
Colin Watson
27;print Email::Valid->rfc822(q([EMAIL PROTECTED]))'
1
I think the description needs to be improved; perhaps it means "dot (.)
immediately before at-mark (@)", which *is* invalid in RFC822.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To U
d, but I think mostly good).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing and checking more and more iterative hash functions that
don't actually add significant collision-resistance when you check them
all together, a generalised checksumming tool as proposed seems an
obviously sensible and desirable thing to have.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:01:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> A lintian-like test to see if the listed bugs match the package before
> uploading seems more useful to me. It would have prevented this
> particular problem.
yaclc provides this.
--
Col
ngs for other languages (see the
changelog entry for debconf 0.3.74).
My impression is that these days maintainer scripts are much better
about not mixing up debconf interaction with normal use of stdout, and
so it's still possible that the fd 3 hack will be removed some day.
--
Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:43:19AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:30:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that the debconf helper scripts provide stdout on &3, so any
> >
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:51:00AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:30:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that the debconf helper scripts provide stdout on &3, so any
> >
>
> Ubuntu's apt package ships only the Ubuntu archive keyring, not the Debian
> archive keyring, so no update is needed when Debian keys change.
That doesn't mean we (Ubuntu) have solved the problem of how to rotate
*our* keys in the event of a key compromise. (To my knowledge, we
g, I agree it's not the best
phrasing and for grammatical reasons should be changed to "synced from
Debian".
Matt has already said he'll ask for this to be changed (it's on Mark's
personal wiki page, so changing it directly would be a bit rude), so
hopefully we can
lude socket support.
Socket support does seem to be there:
$ dpkg -c
/mirror/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-minimal_2.4.2-1ubuntu2_i386.deb
| grep socket
-rw-r--r-- root/root 49608 2006-01-17 12:59:02
./usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload/_socket.so
gt; . symlink paths
hardcoded as specified in policy (11.8.7, "Installation directory
issues") would continue to work as well.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/328498
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. If not, the usual workaround is for
> ndiswrapper to instead declare an Enhances relationship on foo.
Traditionally Suggests have been OK, although one of the main reasons
why Enhances was invented as a reverse-Suggests was to allow all
references to non-free packages to be removed from main&
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:27:48PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:32:46AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It's common for e.g. network card manufacturers to provide their images
> > on a floppy disk. If ndiswrapper were integrated into d-i, then it woul
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:59:02AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-02 05:08]:
> > Joey has been campaigning [1] for a while to get everything in the
> > archive changed to depend on debconf | debconf-2.0 or similar rather
> >
uot;themeable", i.e. the display style is in code in /lib so you
can't customise it locally without having it trashed on upgrade, and so
on. Fixing that would be good.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-traffic enough to be readable anyway.)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not interested in extra merge effort
due to an Ubuntu patch for a spelling error, so I generally just
make these in Debian directly as I notice them and only hurry the
merge to Ubuntu if they're user-visible.
I hope this helps to clarify things a little. It's a hug
kgrounding itself if it's there and if there isn't already an
update-menus process waiting.
It could be an apt DPkg::Post-Invoke hook, but this is no good for
people running 'dpkg -i' directly; really, it's an ideal use case for
the as-yet-unimplemented dpkg trigger mec
ersion 2.0-6 in unstable; look for
log_*_msg.
The main current issue with these functions, IMO, is that the output is
not user-configurable.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
uld resend.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
verity (and, honestly, what's the
point of the release-critical severities otherwise)? We can block
packages from testing, but it's awkward to do that routinely for single
bugs, and I wouldn't want to encourage that situation.
--
Colin Watson [
gt; > it into sid and not worry about the dependency issue, right?
> >
> > i've been using apt .6 on one of my machines, and while i haven't kept
> > a super-close eye on it, i haven't noticed anything that would make
> > me think it an unsuitable candidate
we hope should make this less likely to
happen again.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:21:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > What it means: the Ubuntu maintainer for tla-load-dirs (sorry, don't kno
eems to
> > assume udeb support and Debian is not there yet.
>
> I have no idea what you mean. What does running hpoj as non-root have to do
> with udebs?
s/udeb/udev/g
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
average more along the lines of handling different
archive layouts than insanely voluminous translation changes, I'll feel
less like I'm bloating the d-i repository up with stuff that doesn't
benefit Debian by committing it there.
--
Colin Watson
ly, depending on
how much time we have available to make the code better and more generic
versus just making it work so that we can ship something.
Yes, fixing that situation could be very useful for other derivative
distributions too.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the change as close to the beginning of a release cycle
as possible in order to have as much time as possible to clean up any
resulting problems. This had nothing to do with fictional business
models and everything to do with straightforward practical release
management.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
er?
I think that's pretty unlikely, personally ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:45:59PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On 06/06/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:13:50AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> > > Is it your hope that the debian project will switch to the new software
> > &
at.
>
> That answers my question. Whatever amount of work the porters can do for
> these architectures, they won't be accepted.
That's an incorrect paraphrase of what Steve said.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:44:17AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:45:59PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > ditto, plus, isn't there meant to be a few more good features coming
> &
about needing more buildd maintainers;
he was talking about the task of chasing up issues involved in trying to
get required package uploads built everywhere, which currently ends up
being a very significant time drain on the release team (since that's
the set o
t defined what the
> existing unqualified locale names mean, save in the defaults,
/usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED is a little more than "the defaults", I think.
It's at least standard across systems that use glibc (in that you may
get additional entries, but you won't get differen
Debian could make it the
> default;
I already did:
groff (1.18.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Too many fonts are missing the Unicode HYPHEN character, so I give up.
Render "-" as HYPHEN-MINUS (ASCII 0x2D) by default. (Of course, manual
pages using "-" when they
a correct way, but certainly don't touch
debian/changelog).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e now require manual intervention from the release team?
Yes, for the moment getting that into testing requires release-team
approval (which is unlikely to be withheld - it's just so that the udeb
can be synced at the same time).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:31:06PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2005 15:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, for the moment getting that into testing requires release-team
> > approval (which is unlikely to be withheld - it's just so that the udeb
> > can
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:57:47PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This is an update to the CD and DVD images of Debian 3.1r0.
>
> Colin,
>
> is there any good reason why this announcement was not made to
> debian-a
;t in a freeze any more.
Also, please don't quote the entire long list when replying to it.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Code ported from dpkg.
[...]
-- Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:23:12 -0500
(further fixed in 0.5.11, 10 Sep 2003)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ogress for etch, but not yet finished), so support for
new kernels in sarge starts to look increasingly unlikely after 2.6.11.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ere, along with a good
deal of code.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in languages that aren't just ASCII.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to remove the debconf support for it from the openssh
package recently.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:52:36PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:43:24PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > > Does anyone still use ssh1? It seems quite common for it not to be
> > > supported these day
umentation
directories going missing entirely in some cases. I'll give it another
try soon.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is such a tool, which I mentioned in the changelog:
- ssh and ssh-keyscan now support hashing of known_hosts files for
improved privacy. ssh-keygen has new options for managing known_hosts
files, which understand hashing.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
pound command are not tested,
and are added to the history regardless of the value of
HISTIGNORE.
In any case, I do not see "information exposed over there" as a reason
in itself why information should be exposed over here, especially when
the exposure over
t; this option by default.
Also, this is not true in a world where many desktop users are using GUI
frontends to sftp or the like.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-hashed
names.
-R hostname
Removes all keys belonging to hostname from a known_hosts
file. This option is useful to delete hashed hosts (see
the -H option above).
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PR
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:16:08AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 03, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then I'm afraid you simply haven't read the documentation ...
>
> I did. But I cannot remove entries if I do not know the hostname.
That&#x
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:17:13AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:19:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > (BTW, would you mind fixing #284874? It's six months old and should be
> > trivial...)
>
> Sorry I haven't got round to this
t just fine.
(Of course, people with unusual requirements can always disable
HashKnownHosts, but I'm interested in a sane default.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;
>This declares an absolute dependency. A package will not be
>configured unless all of the packages listed in its `Depends'
>field have been correctly unpacked.
This is incorrect. Depends is as described in policy, with the addition
that dpkg will arb
1 - 100 of 1123 matches
Mail list logo
