Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sten Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have tried downloading them from a different mirror with the same
> > result. Are these packages really bogus, or am I just cursed? I don't
> > rely on these packages, but dselect complains, and that is a
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > It most certainly is not.
> >
> > Hmmm? What's missing then, since we are running a perfectly working
> > 1.2.17 system...
>
> Any sane Amiga installation disks; a non-buggy-pseudo-1.3 base set.
> An
Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are now some packages for m68k that make sense only on a
> specific machine type. Currently we have such packages only for Atari,
> but others can follow easily. The packages are nvram and setsccserial,
> and atari-fdisk is about to be debianized.
>
I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to distinguish
between the two.
The main advantage would be that one could use tar.bz2 for deb
package
Christophe Broult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > BTW: tar can handle bz2 files. you can use --use-compress-program=bzip2.
>
> That option isn't working properly with bzip2 but hopefully bzip2 is
> now supported by tar ie
>
> tar cIf
> tar xIf
> ta
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files
> > > via the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one
> > > could teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm the tar maintainer for Debian, among other things.
>
> : -z filter through gzip, bzip, bzip2 as appropriate
>
> : That would be a nice thing.
>
> But really hard to get right for compression. :-)
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> : fast. Its not agood solution, so thats why I asked here about
> : integrating bzip2 support into gzip.
>
> Points well taken. You're just asking in the wrong place. You should take
> this up with the gzip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erv Walter) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply - catching up.
>
> > IMHO speed is always relevant, and so is memory usage. This is the trap
> > Micro$oft
> > and Apple have fallen into. Just because the hardware is capable of runn
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is there another way to tell programs where to look for pixmaps
> or libraries. Is there a library which handles such problems
> (I want to do the following: at first search the files in "." than
> in the path defined by PIXMAP_PATH, may be
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22 Apr 1998, Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Do you look at ~/ ? Maybe ~/.tedy.xpm should be used if present. :)
> That seems me a little bit oversized. To make it more clear what I want to
> do:
>
> xteddy needs four files:
"Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 5:23 pm +0200 "Andreas Tille"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. This doesn't answer your question, but as an additional feature
> request, how about if no -F is given, use argv[0]. So a hard link to
> xpenguin gets the debian c
Vaclav Hula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all there!
Hi
> P.S. Is something wrong with this:
>
>*.tar.gz|*.tgz|*.tar.Z)
> tar tzvf $1 ;;
>
> *.gz|*.Z|*.z)
> gzip -dc $1 ;;
>
> +*.tar.bz2|*.tbz2)
> +tar tIvf $1 ;;
Tar forks to bzip2
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22 Apr 1998, Brederlow wrote:
>
> > > request, how about if no -F is given, use argv[0]. So a hard link to
> > > xpenguin gets the debian chap, etc...
> >
> > A softlink would do. You can try it with gzip
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > appropriate, though?
>
> By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to use pristine
> upstream source (since the vast majori
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > > appropriate, though?
> > By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to u
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> : Hmm... it's actually probably a good idea to bzip2 the X sources.
> : They're monstrous.
>
> Probably a good idea. However...
>
> The right way to handle this is for someone to broach the subject of usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> No problem here. As I said I *DID* find the answers and got my debian
> installation to talk to my
> ethernet card after making use of available documentation. But it was not
> Debian specfic documentation that
> was most helpfull, but rather general linux networking
"Rev. Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 04:19:42PM +1000, John Boggon wrote:
>
> > Can someone tell me why a new distribution has to be started up just
> > because the current one isn't newbie friendly or easy to install ?
> There isn't really.
Apart f
Here are my thoughts:
"Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 1:57 pm -0400 "Dale Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Keep source in Source Format and use the .deb files for what they were
> > intended, the distribution of "binary" components.
>
> I have little d
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am the E/Imlib/Fnlib maintainer. I would like to help or make
> packages for the other architectures that are able to run them. If you
> have a machine and can give me access please let me know.
>
> BTW is there a list of machines like this somewhere? Mig
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> We have conflicting data here. Mrvn says that the total du
> data is only 76k. Charles says that the data is about 400k (which is
> way more in line with my off the cuff calculations).
If I'm right your calculations where on the basi
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> >>"Brederlow" == Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brederlow> Would that already be a correct Packages file or would dpkg and
> Brederlow> similar scream about wrong entries? Could o
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> Well, now all we have to do is decide how this information
> should be gathered. Does the package maintainer stick it into the deb
> file? Should one upload the file separately (possibly modifying
> dpkg-genchanges to also pgp stamp th
Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are we releasing hamm for any other architectures? I've has a few request
> from new testers. Also who should they contact on architecture specific
> problems?
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
Apart from some missing Packages m68k is running stable.
My A400
Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 02:25:39AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> > >>"Michael" == Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Michael> I think the right place is in the *.deb-file. In the
> > Michael> control-file (like the
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> >>"Brederlow" == Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brederlow> I mean, that when a package is installed, that the
> Brederlow> recorded du tree (which is needed to calculate the size
&
Andreas Degert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Drake> On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 09:48:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What is the benefit of keeping packages in an unconfigured
> > >> state?
> >
> > Drake>It's a reminder
Andreas Degert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > Andreas> I'd like to integrate more of the bookkeeping tasks into the
> > Andreas> debian system, like being able to display a list of
> > Andreas> warnings/errors after installation is finishe
I compiled a lot of packages on my system and often I see that
programms don't use cc as their compiler. Thus they don't use
/etc/alternatives/cc.
Unless somebody tells me a good reason for not using cc I will open
bugs against any Packages that just uses gcc for fun. I know that some
Packages n
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Could those of you who have grabbed, or are intending to grab the cd images
> from www.uk.debian.org, and then offer them for anon access, please mail me,
> so I can add your sites to the list of mirrors.
>
> For more info about how to grab th
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(James A. Treacy) writes:
> Guy Maor wrote:
> First, due to NMU uploads to other architectures, the source version
> may not match the version: in the package you are looking for.
> This means you need to search the archive for the name of the .dsc
> file. There are about 75 ve
Short question inbetween:
Why is the Debian /etc/inittab different from one use on Watchtower?
Mrvn
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I got Debian installed on a clean disk now using the base1.2tgz and the
instfiles.tar, but I run across some problems:
The /etc/inittab from instfiles.tar gave errors and failed to execute
some program (like dselect). Also the inittab it restored after it was
run was taken from watchtower by t
On Fri, 30 May 1997, Mark Baker wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 13:58:00 +0100
> From: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Problems with inittab
>
>
> In article
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> Milan Zamazal:
>
> > One problem with reporting bugs I feel personally is what to do to
> > avoid repeating reports.
>
> I think it is not the job of the person reporting a bug to worry about
> duplicate reports. Especially not if the person is an end-user and not
> a D
I found a bug in the installation procedure on my Amiga, but the same
will probably happen on all systems.
When I try to partition the drive my root.bin is on during installation,
it pops up a requester asking to unmount / before starting fdisk on it.
After quitting fdisk it remounts /, but the in
rtitioning the
> disk that root is running on is problematical, to say the least.
> On the PC installation floppy root would be a RAM disk at this point,
> and this problem would never come up. I wonder if your boot parameters
> are wrong, or if it is a 68k-specific issue.
>
>
I've downloaded the Debian 1.3 Source CD as isoimage and cat'ed all
peaces together. Mounting the file over a loopback device I got an error:
'Invalid Audio Disk Lentgh 0:00:00' from the filesystem.
Now I wonder which chunk has an error in it? Could somebody with the
proper rights create chs
Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > OK, it's unmounted then, but it should remount the drive if its
> > untouched or ask if it should remount it. I'm not repartitioning
> > the drive, but I had to change the types of t
Kai Henningsen wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goswin Brederlow) wrote on 21.06.97 in <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>:
>
> > OK, it's unmounted then, but it should remount the drive if its
> > untouched
> > or ask if it should remount it. I'm not repartition
Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> If it thinks your CD is an audio disk, it would be an error in the "xaa" file.
> The very first blocks on the CD tell what kind of CD it is.
>
> Bruce
> --
> Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-215-3502
> Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
> PGP f
Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > People did complain that we were promoting Debian to the
> > detriment of Linux.
>
> Yes - but remember, some of the people participating in these
> contests were acting pretty infantile. Instead of focusing on solving
> the problem, they want their team to be at the top of
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Hi,
the current use and definition of Build-Depends/Conflicts[-Indep] in
policy 7.6 don't match. Both use and definition also greatly reduce
the usefullness of these fields. This issue has come up again and
again over the last few years and nothing has been
Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we still want to support very old hardware, especially low memory system
> (eg. some old sparc, and maybe old 386, 486 as well) ?
Then you also need a 1.x kernel. 2.0 is wasting mem and 2.2 doesn´t
boot on low mem maschines. I think its safe to assum
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 11:46:36AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > [description removed]
>
> I have made most of the changed required for my redesign of diskless.
> Amazingly, it looks like no changed are required for dpkg. I haven't
> yet tested anythi
Richard Kaszeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Schulze writes ("Re: /usr/etc and /usr/local/etc?"):
> >Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> >> Just a quick inquiry --
> >>
> >> Why is it that we exclude /usr/etc from our distribution? FHS and FSSTND
> >
> >Because configuration belongs to /etc
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:13:38AM -0800, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> > Caution, IANAD. Just tring to help
> >
> > Package: cricket (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 56948 cricket depends on non-existant package
> >
> > Pac
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> > As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> > other bios
> [snip]
>
> I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the
> bios
> that is already
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Not for me...
>
> Life is nice isn't it?
>
>
> (And then stop sending this "Not for me"-answers all the time or
> something bad could happend)
I would guess thats a mial loop, like an away message.
MfG
Go
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>...
> Quite simply: This type of thing can not be handled before unpacking, so
> it isn't. Debconf allows package to ask questions in their postinst,
> this is just *strongly* discouraged. See the realplayer installer for a
> packag
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Right. I just do nt see these invariants being very useful. I
> > would much rather have a mk-realplayer package that helps me create a
> > realplayer-blah.deb; and the invariants are then natural and not
> > artificially i
"Dr. Guenter Bechly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just have some weird problems to make my uploaded inofficial deb-packages
> apt-getable. The referring site is http://www.bechly.de/debian/. I had all
> five Debian packages in a local directory called 'debian' and correctly run
> dpkg-
Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometime ago someone here mentioned the existance of a bootable cd rom
> image that contained only the contents of the boot floppies to allow
> install over the network on a computer with NO os installed. Anyone
> know the URL where I can find this ima
"Christophe Prud'homme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> I am developper on two projects:
> 1- corelinux (LGPL): http://corelinux.sourceforge.net OOA and OOD for Linux
> 2- freefem(GPL): http://kfem.sourceforge.net Finite Element Code and
>
>
> I have created rather involved
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # apt-get source --compile gri
>
> Or have I missed something?
What is still missing is
apt-get --compile dist-upgrade
That should download all sources (in the correct order) build them,
move the debs to its cache and install.
May the Source be
> Where the heck the word 'stable' comes from? I removed my hole
> /var/state/apt/ and I do not know where it comes from. Hardcoded anywhere
> perhaps? Or did I miss something grave?
>
>
> MfG/Regards, Alexander
What revision of slink do you have? slink 2.1R3 doesn't have that
problem.
Try to
"Christophe Prud'homme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am waiting for my debian maintainer application to take place.
> In the mean time, I want to provide my work to the masses
>
> Here is the apt line to add if you want corelinux (OOA and OOD library for
> Linux)
> These packages wer
----
#!/bin/sh -e
# Anon rsync partial mirror of Debian with package pool support.
# Copyright 1999, 2000 by Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GPL'd.
# Add ons by Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# update potato/woody files and Packages.gz or use
> " " == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it will need to:
> 1. Remove all symlinks in /usr/doc that correspond to symlinks
>or directories with the same names in /usr/share/doc
> 2. If there are any directories with the same names in /usr/doc
>and /
>>>>> " " == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> What is the reason for linking /usr/doc to /usr/hare/doc (or
>> share/doc)?
> So that packages that are not policy complient and contain
> fi
> " " == Erik Hollensbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some packages refuse to install, and of course, break apt in
> the process. Right now, I'm *hopefully* going to be able to
> repair a totally hosed server that failed an apt-get because
> MAN AND GROFF failed to install
Hi,
I've been asked about my rsync mirror script, which is an extension
from Joey Hess's one, on irc and here several times.
So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a debconf
interface for configuration, cronjob or ip-up support and whatever else
is needed to keep an uptodate
> " " == Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Russell Coker | My lilo configuration scripts need to be able
> to infer the correct location | for the MBR. I am currently
> using the following algorithm: | take root fs device from
> /etc/fstab and do the followin
Hi,
I want to use start-stop-daemon to start the debian-mirror script if
its not already running. I don't trust the script, so I run it as user
mirror:nogroup.
But then start-stop-daemon can't write a pidfile to /var/run.
Whats the right[tm] way for this?
root:~% start-stop-daemon -S -m -c mirr
>>>>> " " == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to use start-stop-daemon to start the debian-mirror
>> script if its not already running. I don
>>>>> " " == Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I've been asked about my rsync mirror script, which is an
> extension from Joey Hess's one, on irc and here several times.
> So would there be intrest in a deb of the
>>>>> " " == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 02, Goswin Brederlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a
>> debconf interface for configuration,
> " " == zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi, [i'm not sure if this has been resolved, lart me if you
> like.]
> my proposal to resolve big Packages.gz is through package pool
> system.
Whats the problem with a big Packages file?
If you don't want to download it a
> " " == Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>> from time to time people mentions some nifty tools (mostly
>> scripts?)
> to search for info about packages and similar. Eg the citation
> below. Is there some list/collection/etc of such utilities?
> Or f
>>>>> " " == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:10:19AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
>> touch /var/run/debian-mirror.pid chown mirror.nogroup
>> /var/run/debian-mirror.pid
Hi,
it seems that more and more Packages disapear from potato and are
replaced by links into the pools. And thats not new pakages that are
becoming stable, but old once getting moved.
Did I miss something there?
Also a link is placed in /debian/dists/potato/main/source for each
package thats now
Hi,
the Author of tar changed the --bzip option again. This time its even
worse than the last time, since -I is still a valid option but with a
totally different meaning.
This totally changes the behaviour of tar and I would consider that a
critical bug, since backup software does break horribly
>>>>> " " == Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
>> Whats the problem with a big Packages file?
>>
>> If you don't want to download it a
>>>>> " " == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on apt
>> about this.
> Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with
>>>>> " " == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In 05 Jan 2001 19:51:08 +0100 Goswin Brederlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
> scripsit : Hello,
>> I'm currently discussing some changes to the rsync cli
> " " == esoR ocsirF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to set up our local partial mirror to run without
> attendance through multiple releases. If I hard code the
> release candidate name into the mirror script, wont it just
> break when testing goes stable?
The
> " " == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> May 19-20 Berliner Linux Infotage
> http://www.belug.org/infotage/
Intresting. Gotta check my calendar for a vistit to my parents in
Berlin during that time.
> July 5-8 LinuxTag 2001, Stuttgart http://www.linuxtag.org/
> " " == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, would anyone object if I made the diskless package
> depend on devfs support from 2.4.x in future versions?
Please do.
MfG
Goswin (a devfs fan).
>>>>> " " == Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Goswin Brederlow wrote: > the Author of tar changed the --bzip
>> option again. This time its even > worse than the last time,
>> since -I is still a valid option but with
> " " == Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, there is a bug in the mc package, that most likely is
> related to devfs. I can't reproduce it, nor does it seem to be
> common.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=57557&repeatmerged=yes
>
> " " == Thorsten Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Petr Èech wrote:
>> Adam Lazur wrote:
>>> The ability to install more than one version of a package
>>> simultaneously.
>> Hmm. SO you install bash 2.04-1 and bash 2.02-3. Now what will
>> be /bin/bash 2.04
> " " == s Lichtmaier writes:
>> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp>mount -o loop foo 1 > Why dont we just
>> patch mount to use /var/run/mtab? > I dont know about any
>> other program which modifies it.
>>
>> because /var is not always on the same partition as /
> /etc/mt
>>>>> " " == Sam Couter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> PS: Why not change the Solaris version to be compatible with
>> the widely used linux version? I'm sure there are mo
> " " == Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:33:05 -0700 (MST) Jason Gunthorpe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > If that suits your needs, feel free to write a bugreport on
>> apt about this. Yes, I enjoy closing such bug reports with a
>> ter
> " " == Martin Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Joey Hess wrote: > I think /etc/mtab is on its way out. A 2.4.x
>> kernel with devfs has a > /proc/mounts that actually has a
>> proper line for the root filesystem. >
>>>>> " " == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
>> Actually the load should drop, providing the following feature
>> add ons: [...]
> The loa
> " " == zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, [Sorry for the thread broken, my POP3 provider stopped.]
> [Please Cc: me! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Sorry! ;-)]
> 1. RFDiscussion on big Packages.gz
> 1.1. Some statistics
> % grep-dctrl -P
>
-sPackage,Priority,I
>>>>> " " == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:05:27AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:25:43AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann
>> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 03:28:46
>>>>> " " == zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [A quick reply. And thanks for discuss with me! And no need to
> Cc: me anymore, I updated my DB info.]
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:51:26PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
&
Hi,
I tried to contact the apt maintainers about rsync support for
apt-get (a proof of concept was included) but haven't got an answere
back yet.
Is the whole team on vacation? Who is actually on that list?
>From the number of bugs open against apt-get I would think they are
all dead. Please pro
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:12:59AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
>> Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote: > Just as linux-centric as the other way is
>> solaris-centric.
>>
>> Not true. There's the way GNU tar works,
> " " == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 12:07:14 -0500 From: Michael Stone
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I certainly hope that the debian version at least prevents
>> serious silent breakage by either reverting the change to -I
>> and printing
> " " == Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's commonly agreed that compression does prevent rsync from
> profit of older versions of packages when synchronizing Debian
> mirrors. All the discussion about fixing rsync to solve this,
> even trough a deb-plugin is IMHO
> " " == Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian May writes:
> "zhaoway" == zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
zhaoway> 1) It prevent many more packages to come into Debian, for
zhaoway> example, Linux Gazette are now not present newest issues
zhaoway> in Debian. P
> " " == Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello and good evening. Curently I am programing a new
> All-In-One Mail-Client (for Windows- Changers ;-)) ) and I need
> to program a Drag-N-Drop interface.
> Please can anyone point me to the right resources ???
>>>>> " " == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "Goswin" == Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Goswin> Actually the load should drop, providing the following
Goswin> feature add ons:
> How
>>>>> " " == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> I tried to contact the apt maintainers about rsync support for
>> apt-get (a proof of concept was included) but haven't got a
>>>>> " " == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Actually the load should drop, providing the following feature
>> add ons:
>>
>> 1. cached checksums and pull
>>>>> " " == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> I don't need to get a filelisting, apt-get tells me the
>> name. :)
> You have missed the point, the presence of the ab
1 - 100 of 2483 matches
Mail list logo
