Re: github and its workflows (was Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!)

ns and much faster to send and handle them than using the BTS > I think this is really great to lower the barrier for newcomers, to make > them feel accepted and I too dive deeper eventually. +1 Not only newcomers, but also the typical sysadmin with no spare time. -- Bernd Zeimetz

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

On 01/30/2017 05:45 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > I agree, they aren't as good. However, they're very nearly as good, and > it's too common to overstate how good GitHub's workflow is. Nearly as good? Where can I click 'merge' in a web

Re: Git hosting for code that provides Debian services

natives like https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea - which is an actually working and maintained fork of gocs. Definitely more worth a try than gitlab. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

cheers, bernd -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

diff the build output? Did the packages fail with the same error running the same command? Are there other differences in the output? Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fi

Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?

wed. We don't need yet another process, if you want to get rid of a package you can open an RFA bug or orphan it and/or open an rc bug, so it won't be part of the next stable release unless somebody takes care of it. And then ask for removal. -- Bernd Zeimetz

Re: sarge bo rex

hits in your favourite search engine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

PHP Support in Debian

machines and is distributed/signed with a key we trust. Will there be a proper solution for that soon? Thanks, Bernd -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11

Re: PHP Support in Debian

On 2018-10-16 22:35, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: This was recently discussed on the -backports list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2018/10/threads.html#00014 Thanks, I've missed that thread. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bz

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

s. Systemd comes with a steep learning curve, but one you've stated using its features you'll never go back. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Debian built from non-Debian sources

awesome work to ensure we can ship a release. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Whether remotely running software is considered "software" for Debian.

h is implemented by a client. Also nobody stops you from changing the client code to work with a different/similar kind of server you've implemented. So it is free software, please move on. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. This is > http://bugs.debian.org/751121. Did you check if they apply to netatalk 3.1.7? On the first quick look the problem files are gone. -- Be

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/26/2015 08:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 20:27:07) >> >> On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. >&

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

upstream bug report regarding the copyright issue, nor was I able to find an upstream bug report. If you are unwilling to maintain the package, please give at least pointers to the appropriate information. The current state of netatalk in Debian is not acceptable. - -- B

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

port them upstream. if not I guess jonas should be able to upload it asap. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Re: Automatic dbgsym packages built by default as of today!

on from/for other languages/interpreters? Cheers, Bernd - -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

usual architectures which come with various limitations. I know at least one platform where adding an initramfs is something between difficult and impossible. And I'm sure there is a lot of other (embedded) hardware out there which needs a reliable upgrade path. - -- Bernd

Re: Adding SONAME to a shared object in KLEE

might work. There might be better options, though. Cheers, Bernd - -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

<    2   3   4   5   6   7