How to check why a package is in contrib

2009-07-30 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I was trying to check why a package was in contrib (jabref), and I could not find a means to do that automatically. Could we add an automatic mechanism based on package description, for getting the reason, like for instance, why-contrib: reason It will ease the move to main in case of for

Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2009-09-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, According to Paul Wise: >The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the >BSD license. More information about this can be found here: >>http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ >http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/09/msg00039.html The following

Bug#548195: Move cmap and cmap depend package to main

2009-09-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: general Severity: wishlist The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the BSD license. More information about this can be found here: http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/09/msg00039.html This a meta

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2009-09-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le jeudi 24 septembre 2009 11:46:54, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Hi, > > According to Paul Wise: > >The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the > > > >BSD license. More information about this can be found here: > >>http://bonedaddy

Re: Orphaning my packages...

2009-09-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 03:04:25, Kevin B. McCarty a écrit : > Hi all, > > I unfortunately don't have the free time at the moment to do much for > the Debian Project, so I'm orphaning my packages. > > If anyone wants to stake a claim to any of the following, please go > ahead and say so, other

Re: RFC: RelaxNG and XML schema schemes packaged for Debian

2009-11-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 14:18:51, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > > Daniel Leidert, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 17:36:05 +0100, a écrit : > > > A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we > > > (Debian) AFAIK don't have t

Bug#508585: Please provide an easy and official way to get debug symbols for all arch

2008-12-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: general Severity: normal hello, In case of bug on rare arch it is quite difficult for the maintener to get debug trace. A generic stuff like http://debug.debian.net/ will help to solve hard diagnose bug like the #508443 and avoid to create -dbg package like in #508582: apt-cache sear

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Luca wrote: >>2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli : >> >>> I can't really see what I'm doing wrong... >> >>Maybe I have a clue: >> >>++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir) >>++{ >>++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG & dir->d_type)) || >>++ (

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Luca wrote: >>>2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli : >>> >>>> I can't really see what I'm doing wrong... >>> >>>

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Florian Weimer writes: > I would very much like this library to become the *only* WPAD > implementation anywhere. Hopefully eventually with some ability to > define local policies, where the default Debian policy could be very > strict. E.g

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:51:34PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> > Florian Weimer writes: >> >> > I would very much like this library to become th

Help needed for #377468

2008-12-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi! I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular libXt in order to adapt against different libXt version depending of the browser used. The ques

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2008-12-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Thanks for your concerns. I appreciate it. > > Florian Weimer wrote: >> Not enabling WPAD with DNS devolution goes a long way towards dealing >> with this mess. > > Would you be fine if libproxy disabled WPAD by defau

[libmagick9] Help needed defoma

2008-12-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Tags: help Hi, Imagemagick does use a static list of police. This could lead to problem and user have already send bug report. Could be possible to help us implementing a defoma script for imagemagick? Regards Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Bug#509063: ITP: libproxy -- automatic proxy configuration management library

2009-01-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi Florian, and sorry for the long delay. > > Florian Weimer wrote: >> Well, it's not my package, so you don't have to listen to me. I'm >> also not speaking for the security team. > > Oh, should you have said that before, I'd have

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let > us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref another distrib bugzilla. For in

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let &g

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> > >> > I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref >>

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >ll need I suppose cooperation from BTS itself but in a second > time. We need only two user tags by foreign distrib: > bts-link-foreign-xref-$distrib set to the foregin bugzilla entry > bts-link-foreign-status-$distrib magi

Bug#512916: ITP: [auto07p] -- a software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ordinary differential equations

2009-01-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: auto07p Version: 0.6 Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/ License: BSD with some part GPL Description: AUTO is a software for continuati

MIA Ryuichi arafune?

2007-11-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
It seems Ryuichi is MIA. See for instance http://www.webservertalk.com/archive97-2007-1-1765203.html Ryuichi are you reading this? What's your status regarding Debian? Particularly what is your status regarding bug 432185 (gnuplot-mode)? Thank you very much, -- "ROUCARIES Bastien"

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-01-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi, > > According to Paul Wise: > >>The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the >>BSD license. More information about this can be found here: >>>http://bonedaddy.net/pabs

Re: Bug#565675: ITP: pthsem -- pth replacement with semaphore support

2010-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit : >> Samuel Thibault wrote: >> > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit : >> > > * Package name    : pthsem >> > [..] > > The problem is that people know pth, but

Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-03-01 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Remainder: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>>The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the >>>BSD license. More information about this can be found here: >>>>http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-fre

Re: Bug#545782: imagemagick-dbg: missing README.Debian to explain how programs are used

2010-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Any progress on this bug ? On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: >> Repoening, this doesn't address the original bug report titled "missing >> README.Debian to explain how programs are used". Please provide >>

RE : Re: Cmap file are now free: List of package to move to main

2010-03-06 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
the bug report are already made. Le 6 mars 2010 12:06, "Yves-Alexis Perez" a écrit : On lun., 2010-03-01 at 10:19 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > I have send this mail two months a... Maybe you just need to report bugs against concerned packages so the maintainer cha

Re: Suggestions to fix #433462 (add free space info to reportbug)

2010-03-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi all, > in bug #433462 there is a request to add free space information in > reportbug standard info appended to bug report. > > It's a valid request, that I want to fulfill, but there are some > aspects I'd like to discuss. > > First of all

Re: Suggestions to fix #433462 (add free space info to reportbug)

2010-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2010-03-17 at 17:26 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> On the other hand including free space information will be difficult to >> handle properly and possibly expose information the user considers >> private. > > But places wh

Re: Naming policy for Perl modules (mass bug filing)

2010-03-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
2010/3/23 Ansgar Burchardt : > Hi, > > the Debian Perl Policy asks for packages for the Foo::Bar module to be > named libfoo-bar-perl [1].  Some packages do not adhere to this scheme: > >  opalmod               → libopal-perl >  gnuift-perl           → libgnuift-perl >  perl-mapscript        → libm

Re: Libreadline6 is GPLv3: incompatible with GPLv2-only software

2010-04-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:09 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote: >> >> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across one >> example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-only, and is >> linked against GPLv3 libread

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sun, 16 May 2010 18:18:14 -0400, Felipe Sateler > wrote: >> Is there a reason to support non-UPG systems? > Not to force users to use anything that they don't want? > > > btw: While I stopped at some point commenting that issu

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:48:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > >> Will be done in base-files 5.4. > > I think that this change was done prematurely. There is still the > issue of a Debian system running in a non-UPG environment. And so f

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > >> Santiago Vila writes: >> > In either case, if we plan to set default umask in /etc/login.defs or >> >> /etc/login.defs is not read when I login to openssh server and it has >> "UseLogin"

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Reinhard Tartler [100517 08:56]: >> Let's have a look at the source. Note that options->usergroups is set >> iff the option "usergroups" is used. >> >> ,[modules/pam_umask/pam_umask.c] >> | /* Set the process nice, ulimit, and umask fr

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:08:17AM +, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On 2010-05-18, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: >> > Not to speak about, that UPG is anyway a questionable abuse of the >> > user/group concept. >> > >> > Neither to speak abo

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
reopen 315089 thanks On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Aaron Toponce [100517 13:05]: >> On 05/17/2010 10:49 AM, Harald Braumann wrote: >> > from pam_umask's description of the usergroups option: >> > >> > If the user is not root, and the user ID is equal to the group ID,

Re: UPG and the default umask

2010-05-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:40:06PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Harald Braumann wrote: >> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:08:17AM +, Philipp Kern wrote: >> >> On 2010-0

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: > This should probably then move to Debian-Project? > > On 07/21/2010 11:31 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 05:34:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> >> >>> I think that what we need is Debian Blends that include official

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010 à 11:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> Support of debian is excellent but we are less user friendly than >> ubuntu. For isntance the bug sytem could be made simplier for joe >> simple

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIES writes: > >> Support of debian is excellent but we are less user friendly than >> ubuntu. For isntance the bug sytem could be made simplier for joe >> simpler user, using an http interface than repo

Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: >> In Launchpad, for anything in universe, the typical experience is that >> your bug goes into a black hole until a month or two later someone sends >> you some form letter about it. > > That's why I

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("teaching users how to submit good bug reports"): >>    So, point 2: are we *advertising* reportbug enough to our users? >>    In particular, I'm thinking about advertising in "push mode" rather >>    then in "pull mo

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:05:17PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >>    So, point 2: are we *advertising* reportbug enough to our users? >>    In particular, I'm thinking about advertising in "push mode" rather >>    then in "pull mode". >

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-22 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Do, 22 Jul 2010, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> If you are still unable to find and use reportbug, then I doubt that you >> are able to identify a bug and much less provide the information >> required to actually fix it. > > Agreed upon that. Typ

Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Brian May wrote: >> On 23 July 2010 00:05, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> > 1) I've been teaching him how to use reportbug [...] >> >> Recently I have found reportbug and other bts tools rather annoying >> because of their

RE : Re: teaching users how to submit good bug reports

2010-07-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Using libproxy could help here. (Sorry for top post android) Bastien Le 25 juil. 2010 14:11, "Don Armstrong" a écrit : On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Marc Haber wrote: > From where does reportbug obtain that information? How does it cope > with corporate installations... Let's not make perfect the enem

Re: why are there /bin and /usr/bin...

2010-08-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
> A better test might be to do this without /usr mounted. > > MfG >        Goswin Could we do automated testing using: - creating a new mount namespace - a bind mount of /usr on a empty directory ? A second option will be to modify fakeroot in order to avoid the /usr/binding and run some test lik

QEMU HPPA image

2010-08-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, In order to chase a bug (#592712) on hppa, i try to run qemu on hppa. I begin to try to download a qemu image on http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu but i could not found a qemu image. Do you know where to download such an image ? I will be handy to add to usual place. I will try tomorro

Re: QEMU HPPA image

2010-08-13 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:55:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> >> > QEMU doesn't emulate HPPA, that's why you can't find such an image. >> >> Looks like there is/was work in progress

Re: libexplain: need access to debian alpha machine

2010-08-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Peter Miller > wrote: > >> I'm trying to get my libexplain project [1] to build on Debian alpha. >> I don't actually have access to an alpha machine, so my feedback loop is >> via the Debian build farm [2]... on

Re: Atlas proposal

2010-08-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
> I agree on this.  What we still don't agree on is whether you can build > an optimized package at all, since Atlas will optimize it for the > machine where it got built, and the optimizations it does will > potentially make performance worse on another machine... > > Samuel > How does atlas cope

Re: conflicting with a package that has a binary with the same name ?

2010-08-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On 21/08/2010 15:00, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:23:19 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> But nodejs is getting more popular, and renaming its binary to nodejs >>> will probably upset many users. Is it legitimate to keep /us

Re: ITP: yade -- Platform for discrete element modeling.

2011-01-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Anton Gladky > > > * Package name    : yade >  Version         : 0.60 >  Upstream Author : Yade developers > * URL             : https://launchpad.net/yade > * License         : GPL >  Programming L

Re: Safe File Update (atomic)

2011-01-06 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:57:07AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> Ted Ts'o writes ("Re: Safe File Update (atomic)"): >>> > Then I invite you to implement it, and start discovering all of

Qt3 removal rational

2011-02-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit. In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of uptream lack ressource to port to qt4. At my workplace (university) we are using a lot this kind of so

Need jquery.fancybox

2011-02-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
tags 611125 + help thanks Hi, As a developper of imagemagick, i am correcting bug #611125, and i need to package jquery.fancybox However I have no experience in javascript and I need some help. Please package jquery.fancybox Thanks Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.

Bug#613525: ITP: [PACKAGE] -- metakit

2011-02-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: metakit Version: 2.4.9.7 Upstream Author: Jean-Claude Wippler j...@equi4.com URL: http://equi4.com/metakit/index.html License: MIT Description: Metakit is an efficient embedded database library with a sma

Adopt a removed package: how to ?

2011-02-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I plan to adopt a removed from archive package (see #183373). How can I do ? I have marked myself as ITA of 183373. It is the right way ? I plan to download previous debian package, the new source and to do some adaptation. Should I use the process of a new package or an adopted package

Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
hi, More and more packages depend on avahi aka zeroconf. I have found some information on http://wiki.debian.org/ZeroConf Because I work in a untrusted work place and home network (public networks, wifi...) I whish to purge zeroconf functionnality. however a lot of package depends (or recomme

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 23:09 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: >> Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> > Because I work in a untrusted work place and home network (public >> > networks, wifi

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Am Mi den  2. Mär 2011 um 18:25 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: >> More and more packages depend on avahi aka zeroconf. I have found some >> information on http://

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 02 mars 2011 à 18:25 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> And more specifically from an administrator point of view does avahi >> could library could be made purgeable and no more than suggest >> dependen

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > Am Do den  3. Mär 2011 um  3:35 schrieb Chow Loong Jin: >> > A system has not to listen for any unused and unneeded services ever. A >> > firewall is to control services you _need_.

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Klaus Ethgen > > Hi, > > | The thoughts of that makes me shiver! Trusting untreatable sources on a > | network for configuring local stuff is worse ever. > > Then just don't use it?  Nobody is forcing you to. > > | > I think those two fu

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On to, 2011-03-03 at 11:54 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> Am Do den  3. Mär 2011 um 11:25 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: >> > Then just don't use it?  Nobody is forcing you to. >> [...] >> > | And even if you not care about, then that functionality

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Sujit Karatparambil wrote: >> However, could we please end the FUDfest? This thread seems to be quite >> unconstructive, with unspecific claims of security problems, unwarranted >> slurs on users based on their operating system, and accusations on >> Debian develop

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> On to, 2011-03-03 at 12:47 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> some package announce their existance to the world without any admin >>> decision!

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Olaf van der Spek >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> >> On to

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIES writes: > >> some package announce their existance to the world without any admin >> decision > > It should be a site policy. And set to no by default or a least well documented >>

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le vendredi 4 mars 2011 10:31:30, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:02:47AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > Hi, > > And even worse, debian is often used on server platforms where you never > > ever want to have any such magically configured services. > > Since avahi isn't a de

Re: Disable ZeroConf: how to ?

2011-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le vendredi 4 mars 2011 13:23:32, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 08:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > ]] Ben Hutchings > > > > Hi, > > > > | On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:20:37PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > | > To the extent this is a bug, it's a bug in the resolver that it

Bug#617339: ITP: [PACKAGE] -- xfstests torture test for xfs and other filesystem

2011-03-08 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: xfstests Version: git20110223 Upstream Author: Alex Elder x...@oss.sgi.com URL: GPL Description: xfstests is a torture test suite for filesystem bugs. It is useful in order to debug problem on linux files

-Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefined fail with undefined reference to `_dl_argv@GLIBC_PRIVATE'

2011-03-09 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Trying to paackage cernlib I get on amd64 gfortran -shared .libs/aintgb.o .libs/alosb.o .libs/andb.o .libs/andntb.o .libs/binvec.o .libs/cntob.o .libs/cntzb.o .libs/copyb.o .libs/cprsb.o .libs/dalosb.o .libs/dcopyb.o .libs/ddotb.o .libs/dgthrb.o .libs/dmod3b.o \ .libs/dotb.o .libs/drangb.o .li

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-03 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> I've got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really >> useful to anybody? >> >> Thoughts? See #508585 and http://debug.debian.net/ It will be really nice to have this stuff gener

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): > >> symbols.  If there's a will to get that done in Debian now, I will >> definitely be happy to ditch the samba-dbg package for one. > > > I support my co-maintainer on that..:-) > > One should

Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?

2009-03-04 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:25:06PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > >> > I'm looking at my local mirror (slowly) update at the moment, and I've >> > got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really useful >> > to anybody? I can't ima

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 18, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. > Other people told me that they believe that nowadays all modern > thinkpads use a kernel driver. > > This is the complete list of groups which I'd

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 18, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. > Other people told me that they believe that nowadays all modern > thinkpads use a kernel driver. > > This is the complete list of groups which I'd

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> On Mar 18, Steve Langasek wrote: >> >>> A peek at the source says it uses /proc/acpi/ibm/light. >> Other people told me that they believe that n

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: >>> On Mar 18, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> >>>> A peek at the source says

Re: User and groups justification (was Re: group nvram)

2009-03-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:16:05 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >>> BTW instead of arguing about group and something like this coul

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 19, Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> Once was thrown the idea to prefix all system groups with ???Debian-???. > One of the most stupid ideas which have ever been inflicted on the > project. > >> This solves this specific problem in a much

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 19, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> It is the same probleme with floppy, tty and disk group. > No, it's not. > >> They should add this group to their ldap database. At least it should > Th

Re: group nvram

2009-03-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Henning Glawe wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> This is the complete list of groups which I'd rather stop using: >>     rdma (infiniband devices) > > is there any alternative way to restrict access to infiniband > without thi

Re: User and groups justification (was Re: group nvram)

2009-03-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:34:44AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Luca Capello wrote: >> > I would prefer any new information to be added there instead, since the >> > files abo

Re: Architecture usertags

2009-03-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi > >> I thought I'd sent out this mail, but apparently I did that when I had >> just reinstalled my laptop and the mailsetup wasn't working yet. Sorry >> about that. >> >> Now almost a month ago, I asked Don Ar

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by > prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone > /usr is too much work and no other distribution worth mentioning does it > (not Ubuntu, not Fedor

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 05, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> - NFS > This is not detailed. /usr NFS shared. Scientific grid use this stuff and it is real world. But may be it is too big for debian ;) >> - for my wifi box (ie a 386 SX

Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories

2014-08-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Guido Günther wrote: >> The gbp manual has a recommended branch layout: >> >> >> http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.BRANCH.NAMING >> >> which could serve as a ba

Re: Possible abuse of dpkg-deb -z9 for xz compressed binary packages

2014-09-01 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le 1 sept. 2014 14:21, "Guillem Jover" a écrit : > > Hi! > > I had noticed this a while ago while reading changelogs, but didn't > realize at the time this poses actual problems, besides being possibly > just a dubious practice. > > There seems to be some packages overriding the default compressio

Re: Can a leaf package require SSE2 on i386?

2014-09-14 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Hi, > > As the maintainer of julia (a technical computing language built on top > of LLVM), I am wondering whether I should continue supporting the i386 > architecture. > > The bottom line is that julia needs SSE2 (and porting it to the

Re: Doxygen and embedded jquery problem, how to solve?

2014-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 17:44:11 Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Scott Kitterman (2014-10-29): >> > Would another option be to use "built-using" the doxygen version in >> > question. Since effectively this is embedded code from the doxyg

Pre-Depends: init-system-helpers

2014-11-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, In order to solve #769551 I need to Pre-Depends: init-system-helpers Indeed preinst script need it: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 27: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: deb-systemd-helper: not found Thus I am asking to add a pre-depends to init-system-helpers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: Pre-Depends: init-system-helpers

2014-11-15 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le 15 nov. 2014 19:18, "Bastian Blank" a écrit : > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > In order to solve #769551 I need to Pre-Depends: init-system-helpers > > Indeed preinst script need it: > > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst

Re: Packages using old dpkg tools paths

2014-11-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le 18 nov. 2014 17:29, "Guillem Jover" a écrit : > > Hi! > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:23:37 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I'm planning on starting to file bug reports for the source packages > > below (BCCed). > > Here's the current status. I've filed bugs now with patches, or just > uploaded fo

Re: Pre-Depends: init-system-helpers

2014-11-20 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le 19 nov. 2014 21:33, "Russ Allbery" a écrit : > > Jonas Smedegaard writes: > > > Which implies, I believe, that any other way of starting daemons should > > also respect policy-rc.d if it can lead to automated triggering. > > > Example: if a logrotate snippet uses "update-rc.d force-restart ...

Re: why do people introduce stup^Wstrange changes to quilt 3.0 format

2012-05-16 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:17:17PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: >> No, I hereby start saying good by to 3.0 > > I'm hoping we can revisit 3.0 (git) post-squeeze, myself. But I have also > found myself to be incompatible iwth 3.0 (quilt) and

RE : Re: why do people introduce stup^Wstrange changes to quilt 3.0 format

2012-05-21 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
gitpkg with quilt hook is very nice. Have a branch with debian change, one for patch queue, one for upstream Use git cherry pick for porting patch I use it for imagemagick Will post my workflow tomorrow I post from my phone, sorry for top post and brievety Bastien Le 21 mai 2012 02:56, "Marco

Re: gitpkg with a quilt export hook

2012-05-23 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Brian May wrote: > On 16 May 2012 19:45, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> You could use gitpkg with a quilt export hook. i use it regularly with >> imagemagick and it work perfectly (it is gitpkg over git over svn). > > Out of curiosity, how do

  1   2   3   4   >