Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Russo
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: keepassxc-proxy-client
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Contact: Henrik Böving
* URL : https://github.com/hargoniX/keepassxc-proxy-client
* License : ISC
Hello,
I discovered a new pet peeve today: if you search for a command in a manual
page,
say -e in man 1 zgrep, it's a crapshot whether just searching for '-e' will find
the command or not. The reason is that "-" may been accidentally encoded as ‐
instead of -.
Now, depending on your email clie
esent less
package-specific
issues.
Best,
Antonio Russo
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d a snippet into the configure script. That modification
could have been flagged using this kind of process.
While this would be a lot of work, I believe doing so would require a
much larger amount of additional complexity in orchestrating attacks
against Debian in the future.
On 2024-03-29 22:41, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 18:21:27 -0600, Antonio Russo wrote:
>> This is a vector I've been somewhat paranoid about myself, and I
>> typically check the difference between git archive $TAG and the downloaded
>>
There are many important and useful things here, but I want to address
this one point:
On 2024-03-30 00:29, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Antonio Russo writes:
>
>> If that's the case, could make those files at packaging time, analogous
>> to the DFSG-exclude stripping process?
On 1/11/21 9:52 PM, Xavier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> bug is fixed with libx11-6 2:1.7.0-2 (I don't know why)
>
> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
Can you check your apt logs if libx11-xcb1 got out of sync? I ran into
massive problems with almost everything X-related when libx11-xcb got
ahead of libx11-6.
Antonio
Hello,
I'm watching dovecot's progress through unstable [1] and it's blocked by
dovecot-antispam [2]. If I understand correctly, it's because
dovecot-antispam depends on dovecot-abi-2.3.abiv11, which is not provided
by the new version of dovecot-core (which instead provides a new abi
virtual pack
On 1/27/21 12:58 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> For step 2 someone needs to request a binNMU
>
> reportbug release.debian.org -> binNMU
>
> See also https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
>
> Best
>
Thank you (for the info, and processing the binNMU)!
Antonio
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Desc
Hello,
I'm trying to build a Debian bullseye kernel (with KASAN enabled, but that's
irrelevant).
I'm following [1], and the critical command
$ fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_i386_none_real
does not suggest using -j8 (or -jnumber_of_cores).
1. Is it safe to add -j8 ?
2. Will this
On 7/1/21 7:38 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-07-02 01:24:09 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
>>
>> For sophisticated users it isn't very hard to verify that packages
>> don't do anything malicious as root. `apt install --download-only`,
>> `dpkg-deb --raw-extract`, read the maintainer scripts
Hello,
I have a question that I originally posed in debian-vote, but was directed
here instead:
"Can one advertise non-free services in a Debian package?
Is doing so a violation of some Debian policy?
Again, if this is the wrong venue, I'm sorry.
The details are filed against firefox[-es
On 8/15/21 9:06 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:22 AM Antonio Russo wrote:
>
>>"Can one advertise non-free services in a Debian package?
>> Is doing so a violation of some Debian policy?
>
> There is no specific rule against this, but I
Hello,
I'm trying to perform a task during debian/package.config which
requires another package to be installed. I initially thought
pre-depends would be strong enough, because [1] describes it by:
This field is like Depends, except that it also forces dpkg to
complete installation of th
On 3/18/23 09:19, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Antonio Russo writes:
>
>> Indeed, trying to install a package with a pre-depends on certbot that
>> has a debconf debian/config file does not have certbot installed by the
>> time the debconf script starts. This is on testing.
&
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nextcloud-server
Version : 0.1.7
Upstream Author : Antonio Russo
* URL : https://gitlab.com/aerusso/nextcloud-server-deb
* License : AGPL
* Vcs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: inkscape-ext-textext
Version : 0.12.0~git36-gbbb55e6-1
Upstream Author : Jan Winkler
* URL : https://textext.github.io/textext
* License : AGPL
* Vcs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: zfs-linux-git
Version: 0.8~
Upstream Author: Brian Behlendorf
URL: http://www.zfsonlinux.org/
License: CDDL
Description:
ZFS is
On 12/2/24 18:15, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Unfortunately, I think that many contributor’s experiences with Debian are
closer to what I experienced with Guix than what I experienced with Debian.
If we can change that, I think we would see an influx of contributions to the
project.
As a contributor
On 11/21/24 15:19, Iustin Pop wrote:
I'm not happy with the heavyness that one gets via gpg just for
verifying signatures, so I'd be all for a lighter-weight solution.
gpgv is lighter weight than gpgv-sq. Surprisingly, it's not just
the rustc-static-links-everything problem, since gpgv-static
lent piece of my
infrastructure that has always "just worked." Is there an article
about this, what is going wrong, and/or what needs to be done?
Thanks,
Antonio Russo
21 matches
Mail list logo
