Andrew Donnellan wrote:
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every*
copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU
utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one copyright holder: FSF)
or OpenSolaris needs to rel
The following is based on premises that portability is good and
that POSIX is a standard. A proposal.
Over the last couple months we've built about gazillion Ubuntu/Dapper
packages. The process is heavily automated ([1], [2], [3]).
And so, to lookup the result of the XYZ build (where XYZ is a so
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:15:44PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:34:35AM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
The following is based on premises that portability is good and that
POSIX is a standard. A proposal.
I didn't see a con
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:34:35AM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
The following is based on premises that portability is good and that
POSIX is a standard. A proposal.
I didn't see a concrete proposal in your email, only information about
where to find gnusolaris build
Nexenta OS: Debian based GNU/Solaris
==
This is to announce Nexenta: the first-ever distribution that combines GNU and
OpenSolaris. As you might know, Sun Microsystems just opened Solaris kernel
under
CDDL license, which allows one to build custom Operating Systems. Which
Matthew Palmer wrote:
I'm not discounting that it's new and exciting (I wouldn't say "totally", but
that's a matter of opinion), and I'm in fact quite interested in what the
technical benefits of running Debian on a Solaris kernel might be for my
needs. However, Alex did specifically claim tha
Michael Banck wrote:
Do you plan to use debian-installer for installation?
Yes.
Do you plan to submit your port as an official port to Debian once it
stabilizes?
Yes.
If so, do you plan to use Debian's mailing lists and bug
tracking system for development?
No. We have ours: svn, Trac
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't want to debate on legality of GPL vs. CDDL. But if you in doubt,
you could try to ask Sun lawers on why exactly this is possible:
http://www.sun.com/gnome as well as other LGPG and GPL software which is
shipped with Sol
Alex Ross wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't want to debate on legality of GPL vs. CDDL. But if you in doubt,
you could try to ask Sun lawers on why exactly this is possible:
http://www.sun.com/gnome as well as other LGPG and GPL sof
http://www.gnusolaris.org is now open.
We got an overwhelming response! We simply could not process all requests for
the Pilot membership in a timely fashion. We do hope that people waiting for the
login user/password will see this message.
The rest information is on the website. We'll keep it c
John Hasler wrote:
David Schmitt writes:
I have downloaded the elatte_live_prealpha1_x86.iso.gz[1] from your website
and found a dpkg binary on it.
Much to my dismay I was not able to locate the source for this binary,
despite it being obviously under the GPL[2].
Was the requisite written
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the time of writing, I assumed "GNU/Solaris" implied they'd use the
GNU libc (so I didn't even ask them about it).
Having downloaded their preview ISO:
The system is using Solaris's C library, but contains a great deal of
GPL
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Andy Teijelo Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
El Martes, 8 de Noviembre de 2005 1:11, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
"Erast Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I understand your concern. We will release ISO image with CDDL/GPL
sources very soon. Majority of them alr
13 matches
Mail list logo
